Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-28T00:19:26.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unveiling Koro’s diverse conceptualizations across cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

D. Seabra*
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal
I. Lopes
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal
J. Moura
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal
J. Leal
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal
T. Rocha
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal
J. Cunha
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal
S. Torres
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal
D. Santos
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal
G. Santos
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal
N. Ramalho
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Koro, also known in Cantonese as Shook Yang, which literally translates to “shrinking penis”, has its roots in a cultural belief that a mythological figure would steal the penis of his victims. Predominantly reported in Southeast Asia, it involves an acute fear of genital retraction, often accompanied by the belief that this retraction may lead to death. Over the last two centuries, Koro has undergone several attempts to establish its definition and classification, without a true consensus having been reached.

Objectives

This study aims to explore the cultural nuances surrounding Koro and reflect on the various conceptualizations that modulated its definition and nosological classification, from Ancient China until the present.

Methods

A non-systematic literature review with the keywords “koro” and “culture” was conducted.

Results

Koro was only introduced to the Western world during colonial expansion, drawing the attention of several psychiatrists who, in Asian territory, reported numerous cases in natives, making the very first attempts at a nosological classification, whether as an anxiety neurosis, or as an obsessive-compulsive disorder. The literature reveals significant cultural variations in the manifestation of Koro, challenging the traditional psychiatric understanding rooted in Western diagnostic categories. Cultural factors, including societal beliefs, religious practices, and regional variations, emerged as influential contributors to the prevalence and presentation of Koro. Additionally, the study identified instances of Koro evolving in response to cultural shifts and globalization, emphasizing the dynamic nature of this syndrome.

Conclusions

This review underscores the need for a comprehensive understanding of Koro that acknowledges its diverse conceptualizations across cultures. Its occurrence, not only in multiple parts of the world, but also in close relation with various comorbidities, has contributed to the dissolution of its primary identity as a culture-bound syndrome, turning Koro into a moving target.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.