Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T20:52:42.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PW01-135 - Usefulness Of Likert Format In Assessment Of Referential Thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

M.C. Senín-Calderón
Affiliation:
Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
J.F. Rodríguez-Testal
Affiliation:
Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
E. Fernández-Jiménez
Affiliation:
Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
M.M. Benítez-Hernández
Affiliation:
Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
S. Fuentes-Márquez
Affiliation:
Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
M. Valdés-Díaz
Affiliation:
Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Antecedents

We created an experimental adaptation of the REF scale (Lenzenweger et al., 1997), in a Likert format for discriminate between frequency and intensity of referential thinking (Rodríguez-Testal et al., 2008).

Objectives and hypotheses

We try to verify if the Likert format of the REF discriminates between controls and patients, and also in patients with different diagnoses. We predict that there will be differences in frequency and intensity between patients and controls.

Methods

Participants: 108 subjects, 40 patients from a private center of clinical psychology, 55% women, mean age = 35.70 (SD = 12.42) and 68 controls selected from the normal population, 50% women, mean age = 36.35 (SD = 12.99).

It was applied a cross design for a correlation method of comparison between groups. All the analysis were accepted at p< .05.

Results

No differences in referential thinking between patients and controls with Likert format in frequency (t = 1.496, P = 1.14), although there were differences in intensity (t = 2.30, p =.023). No significant differences in referential thinking between types of diagnoses with the Likert format (X2 = 6.63, p =. 249).

Conclusions

The Likert format of the REF scale adequately discriminates between patients and controls in intensity but not in frequency. This format doesn't discriminate between different diagnoses. The Likert format induces and overestimates the response.

Type
Methodology / Assessment methods / Rating scales
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2009
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.