Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T23:21:47.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P-466 - Audit to Compare Patient Factors in People With Refractory Depression in a Bedfordshire Community Mental Health Team Being Augmented With Mirtazepine, Atypical Antipsychotics or Both

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

C. Holt
Affiliation:
Foundation Programme East Anglian Deanery, East Anglian Deanery, UK
S. Butler
Affiliation:
Foundation Programme East Anglian Deanery, UK
M. Agius
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK Psychiatry, South Essex Partnership University Foundation NHS Trust, Bedford, UK
R. Zaman
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK Psychiatry, South Essex Partnership University Foundation NHS Trust, Bedford, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Strategies for the treatment of refractory depression include “switching” and “augmentation”. in recent years, there has been particular interest in the use of augmentation.

Aim:

The purpose of this audit was to define patient factors among people receiving augmentation therapy with either mirtazepine or atypical antipsychotics.

Subjects and methods:

We searched an anonymised database of patients and identified those receiving augmentation with mirtazepine (group A), atypical antipsychotics (group B) or both (group C). for each of the three groups we recorded the following factors: (1) age, (2) sex, (3) suicidal ideation, (4) alcohol problems, (5) drug problems, (6) domestic problems (e.g. debts, child abuse & domestic violence) (7) psychotic symptoms and (8) co-existing physical diagnoses.

Results:

Group B spanned a wider range of ages than either of the other two groups. Group A contained the highest proportion of patients with suicidal ideation than either. Alcohol problems were most common in group A, drug problems most common in group B and domestic problems most common in group C. Perhaps unsurprisingly psychotic symptoms were present in a relatively high percentage of patients in group B. there was little difference in physical co-morbidities between the three groups.

Discussion:

The audit reveals some interesting differences in patient factors between the three groups. Knowledge about such differences is useful in practical terms because it allows doctors in the BCMHT to target therapy for different patients towards their specific needs.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.