Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T10:45:03.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Asymptotic estimate for the counting problems corresponding to the dynamical system on some decorated graphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2017

V. L. CHERNYSHEV
Affiliation:
National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE), Myasnitskaya Street, 20, Moscow, 101000, Russia email vchern@mech.math.msu.su
A. A. TOLCHENNIKOV
Affiliation:
A. Ishlinsky Institute for Problems in Mechanics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Vernadskogo, 101-1, Moscow, 119526, Russia

Abstract

We study a topological space obtained from a graph via replacing vertices with smooth Riemannian manifolds, that is, a decorated graph. We consider the following dynamical system on decorated graphs. Suppose that, at the initial time, we have a narrow wave packet on a one-dimensional edge. It can be thought of as a point moving along the edge. When a packet arrives at the point of gluing, the expanding wavefront begins to spread on the Riemannian manifold. At the same time, there is a partial reflection of the wave packet. When the wavefront that propagates on the surface comes to another point of gluing, it generates a reflected wavefront and a wave packet on an edge. We study the number of Gaussian packets, that is, moving points on one-dimensional edges as time goes to infinity. We prove the asymptotic estimations for this number for the following decorated graphs: a cylinder with an interval, a two-dimensional torus with an interval and a three-dimensional torus with an interval. Also we prove a general theorem about a manifold with an interval and apply it to the case of a uniformly secure manifold.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, M.. A Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry. Springer, Berlin, 2003, p. 824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brüning, J. and Geyler, V. A.. Scattering on compact manifolds with infinitely thin horns. J. Math. Phys. 44(2) (2003), 371405.Google Scholar
Burns, K. and Gutkin, E.. Growth of the number of geodesics between points and insecurity for Riemannian manifolds. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 21(2) (2008), 403413.Google Scholar
Burns, K. and Paternain, G.. On the growth of the number of geodesics joining two points. International Conference on Dynamical Systems (Montevideo, 1995) (Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, 362) . Longman, Harlow, 1996, pp. 720.Google Scholar
Burns, K. and Paternain, G.. Counting geodesics on a Riemannian manifold and topological entropy of geodesic flows. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 17 (1997), 10431059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramanujan, S. and Hardy, G. H.. Une formule asymptotique pour le nombre des partitions de n. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 164 (1917), 3538.Google Scholar
Chernyshev, V. L.. Time-dependent Schrödinger equation: statistics of the distribution of Gaussian packets on a metric graph. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 270 (2010), 246262.Google Scholar
Chernyshev, V. L. and Shafarevich, A. I.. Semiclassical asymptotics and statistical properties of Gaussian packets for the nonstationary Schrödinger equation on a geometric graph. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 15(1) (2008), 2534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernyshev, V. L. and Shafarevich, A. I.. Statistics of Gaussian packets on metric and decorated graphs. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 372(2007) (2014), 20130145.Google ScholarPubMed
Faddeev, L. D. and Pavlov, B. S.. Free electron model and scattering theory. Theor. Math. Phys. 55(2) (1983), 257268.Google Scholar
Knopfmacher, J.. Abstract Analytic Number Theory, 2nd edn. Dover Publishing, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Kuchment, P. and Berkolaiko, G.. Introduction to Quantum Graphs (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 186) . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2014.Google Scholar
Lebedeva, N. D.. Spaces without conjugate points and with fundamental group of polynomial growth. Algebra i Analiz 16(2) (2004), 6981.Google Scholar
Mañé, R.. On the topological entropy of geodesic flows. J. Differential Geom. 45(1) (1997), 7493.Google Scholar
Pollicott, M.. A symbolic proof of a theorem of Margulis on geodesic arcs on negatively curved manifolds. Amer. J. Math. 117 (1995), 289305.Google Scholar
Pollicott, M. and Sharp, R.. Correlations for pairs of closed geodesics. Invent. Math. 163(1–24) (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paternain, G. P.. Geodesic Flows. Birkhauser, Boston, MA, 1999.Google Scholar
Marklof, J.. On multiplicities in length spectra of arithmetic hyperbolic three-orbifolds. Nonlinearity 9(2) (1996), 517.Google Scholar
Maslov, V. P.. The Complex WKB Method for Nonlinear Equations 1: Linear Theory. Springer, Basel, 1994, p. 300.Google Scholar
Maslov, V. P. and Fedorjuk, M. V.. Semi-classical approximation in quantum mechanics. Springer, Dordrecht, 2002, p. 316.Google Scholar
Nazaikinskii, V. E.. On the entropy of the Bose–Maslov gas. Dokl. Akad. Nauk 448(3) (2013), 266268 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Pavlov, B. S.. Model of the zero-range potential with internal structure. Theor. Math. Phys. 59(3) (1984), 345353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krätzel, E.. Lattice Points. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht; VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1988.Google Scholar
Chernyshev, V. L. and Tolchennikov, A. A.. How the permutation of edges of a metric graph affects the number of points moving along the edges. Preprint, 2014 arXiv:1410.5015.Google Scholar