Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Burden of acute gastrointestinal illness in Denmark 2009: a population-based telephone survey

  • L. MÜLLER (a1), H. KORSGAARD (a2) and S. ETHELBERG (a1) (a3)

Summary

A cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted in Denmark throughout 2009 to determine the incidence of acute gastrointestinal illness (AGI). Using the Danish population register, a random population sample stratified by gender and age groups was selected and mobile or landline phone numbers found. Representative numbers of interviews were performed by gender, age group and month. A recently proposed international case definition of AGI, including cases with diarrhoea and/or vomiting in a 4-week recall period, was used. A total of 1853 individuals were included and 206 (11·1%) fulfilled the case definition; 78% reported diarrhoea. This corresponds to an overall standardized incidence rate of 1·4 (95% CI 1·2–1·6) episodes of AGI per person-year. The incidence rate was generally higher in the younger age groups; only being 2·3, 1·9 and 0·80 per person-year in the 0–9, 10–39 and ⩾40 years age groups, respectively. The incidence rate estimates were considerably higher when calculated from shorter recall periods.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Burden of acute gastrointestinal illness in Denmark 2009: a population-based telephone survey
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Burden of acute gastrointestinal illness in Denmark 2009: a population-based telephone survey
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Burden of acute gastrointestinal illness in Denmark 2009: a population-based telephone survey
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Author for correspondence: Dr S. Ethelberg, Department of Epidemiology, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, DK-2300 Copenhagen S., Denmark. (Email: set@ssi.dk)

References

Hide All
1.Scallan, E, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States – unspecified agents. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2011; 17: 1622.
2.Scallan, E, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States – major pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2011; 17: 7–15.
3.Cantwell, LB, et al. The effect of different recall periods on estimates of acute gastroenteritis in the United States, FoodNet Population Survey 2006–2007. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2010; 7: 12251228.
4.Hall, GV, et al. Frequency of infectious gastrointestinal illness in Australia, 2002: regional, seasonal and demographic variation. Epidemiology and Infection 2006; 134: 111118.
5.Herikstad, H, et al. A population-based estimate of the burden of diarrhoeal illness in the United States: FoodNet, 1996–7. Epidemiology and Infection 2002; 129: 9–17.
6.Ho, SC, et al. Acute gastroenteritis in Hong Kong: a population-based telephone survey. Epidemiology and Infection 2010; 138: 982991.
7.Imhoff, B, et al. Burden of self-reported acute diarrheal illness in FoodNet surveillance areas, 1998–1999. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2004; 38 (Suppl 3): S219S226.
8.Kuusi, M, et al. Incidence of gastroenteritis in Norway – a population-based survey. Epidemiology and Infection 2003; 131: 591597.
9.Majowicz, SE, et al. Magnitude and distribution of acute, self-reported gastrointestinal illness in a Canadian community. Epidemiology and Infection 2004; 132: 607617.
10.Sargeant, JM, Majowicz, SE, Snelgrove, J. The burden of acute gastrointestinal illness in Ontario, Canada, 2005–2006. Epidemiology and Infection 2008; 136: 451460.
11.Scallan, E, et al. Acute gastroenteritis in northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland: a telephone survey. Communicable Disease and Public Health 2004; 7: 6167.
12.Jones, TF, et al. A population-based estimate of the substantial burden of diarrhoeal disease in the United States; FoodNet, 1996–2003. Epidemiology and Infection 2007; 135: 293301.
13.Gauci, C, et al. The magnitude and distribution of infectious intestinal disease in Malta: a population-based study. Epidemiology and Infection 2007; 135: 12821289.
14.Flint, JA, et al. Estimating the burden of acute gastroenteritis, foodborne disease, and pathogens commonly transmitted by food: an international review. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2005; 41: 698704.
15.Majowicz, SE, et al. A common, symptom-based case definition for gastroenteritis. Epidemiology and Infection 2008; 136: 886894.
16.Belcher, T, Newell, DG. Crossing the boundaries. Veterinary Records 2005; 157: 682684.
17.Statistics Denmark. Statbank Denmark (www.statistikbanken.dk), 2003.
18.Pedersen, CB, et al. The Danish Civil Registration System. A cohort of eight million persons. Danish Medical Bulletin 2006; 53: 441449.
19.Mangen, MJ, et al. Integrated approaches for the public health prioritization of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens. Risk Analysis 2010; 30: 782797.
20.O'Brien, SJ, et al. Methods for determining disease burden and calibrating national surveillance data in the United Kingdom: the second study of infectious intestinal disease in the community (IID2 study). BMC Medical Research Methodology 2010; 10: 39.
21.Ethelberg, S, et al. Spatial distribution and registry-based case-control analysis of Campylobacter infections in Denmark, 1991–2001. American Journal of Epidemiology 2005; 162: 10081015.
22.de Wit, MA, et al. Sensor, a population-based cohort study on gastroenteritis in the Netherlands: incidence and etiology. American Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 154: 666674.
23.Wheeler, JG, et al. Study of infectious intestinal disease in England: rates in the community, presenting to general practice, and reported to national surveillance. The Infectious Intestinal Disease Study Executive. British Medical Journal 1999; 318: 10461050.
24.Hall, G, et al. Respiratory symptoms and the case definition of gastroenteritis: an international analysis of the potential impact on burden estimates. Epidemiology and Infection 2010; 138: 117–1124.
25.Ethelberg, S, et al. The significance of the number of submitted samples and patient-related factors for faecal bacterial diagnostics. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2007; 13: 10951099.
26.Helms, M, Simonsen, J, Molbak, K. Foodborne bacterial infection and hospitalization: a registry-based study. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2006; 42: 498506.
27.Korsgaard, H, et al. The effects, costs and benefits of Salmonella control in the Danish table-egg sector. Epidemiology and Infection 2009; 137: 828836.
28.Simonsen, J, et al. Usefulness of seroconversion rates for comparing infection pressures between countries. Epidemiology and Infection 2011; 139: 636643.

Keywords

Burden of acute gastrointestinal illness in Denmark 2009: a population-based telephone survey

  • L. MÜLLER (a1), H. KORSGAARD (a2) and S. ETHELBERG (a1) (a3)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed