Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T22:37:37.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Successful Control of the Floating Weed Salvinia molesta in Papua New Guinea: A Useful Biological Invasion Neutralizes a Disastrous One

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Peter M. Room
Affiliation:
Senior Principal Research Scientist, CSIRO Division of Entomology, P.B. No. 3, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia.

Extract

Salvinia molesta, an aquatic weed native of Brazil, entered the floodplain of the Sepik River in Papua New Guinea in the early 1970s. It caused great distress to the local people by increasing exponentially to form thick mats covering many lakes and channels. A beetle from Brazil, Cyrtobagous salviniae, was established in one lagoon in 1982 and over the next 2 years 900,000 adults were redistributed manually among another 130 lagoons and lakes. Rates of beetle population increase (r) were close to 0.042 adult per adult per day in most lagoons. Local dispersal occurred when population densities reached 15 adults per kg of the Salvinia, damaging between 70% and 90% of Salvinia buds. Feeding by adults and larvae of the beetle caused entire mats of Salvinia to turn brown, die, and sink, but no deleterious changes in water quality were observed.

The time taken for beetles to spread throughout a lagoon and for the weed to be controlled was generally 12–18 months, depending on the area of the Salvinia mat, its thickness, and its mobility when blown by the wind. Herbicide was used to aid establishment of the beetle at one site by thinning a thick mat which had been colonized by sudd vegetation. An equilibrium appeared to be reached with the Salvinia present at < 1% of its former populationdensity.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boland, N.P. & Room, P.M. (1983). Estimating population density of a Cyrtobagous sp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on the floating weed Salvinia using Berlese funnels. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 22, pp. 353–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, D., Osborne, P.L. & Redding-Coates, T.A. (1983). The Hydrology and Limnology of the Lower Sepik River, Roundwaters and Floodplain. PNG Fisheries Research Report No. 83/17, 36 pp. (mimeogr.)Google Scholar
Farrell, T.P. (1979). Control of Salvinia molesta and Hydrilla verticillata in Lake Moondarra, North-west Queensland. Australian Water Resources Council Seminar on Management of Aquatic Weeds, 15–16 02 1979, Canberra, pp. 5771.Google Scholar
Forno, I.W. & Harley, K.L.S. (1979). The occurrence of Salvinia molesta in Brazil. Aquatic Botany, 6, pp. 185–7, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forno, I.W., Sands, D.P.A. & Sexton, W. (1983). Distribution, biology and host specificity of Cytrobagous singularis Hustache (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for the biological control of Salvinia molesta. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 73, pp. 8595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gewertz, D.B. (1983). Sepik River Societies. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA: 263 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Holm, L.G., Plucknett, D.L., Pancho, J.V. & Herberger, J.P. (1977). The World's Worst Weeds. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: ii + 609 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Juuen, M.H. & Bourne, A.S. (in press). Compensatory branching and changes in nitrogen content in the aquatic weed Salvinia molesta in response to disbudding. Oecologia.Google Scholar
Loyal, D.S. & Grewal, R.L. (1966). Cytological study on sterility in Salvinia auriculata Aublet with a bearing on its reproductive mechanism. Cytologia, 31, pp. 330–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, D.S. (1969). Autecological Studies of Salvinia auriculata Aubl. PhD thesis, University of London, London, England, UK: 669 pp., illustr. (typescr.).Google Scholar
Mitchell, D.S. (1979). The Incidence and Management of Salvinia molesta in Papua New Guinea. FAO Report to the Office of Environment and Conservation, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea: 51 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Mitchell, D.S., Petr, T. & Viner, A.B. (1980). The water fern Salvinia molesta in the Sepik River, Papua New Guinea. Environmental Conservation, 7(2), pp. 115–22, 4 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E.P. (1971). Fundamentals of Ecology, 3rd edn.W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: xiv + 574 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Room, P.M. (1983). ‘Falling apart’ as a lifestyle: the rhizome architecture and population growth of Salvinia molesta. Journal of Ecology, 71, pp. 349–65, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Room, P.M. (1986). Equations relating growth and uptake of nitrogen by Salvinia molesta to temperature and the availability of nitrogen. Aquatic Botany, 23, pp. 127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Room, P.M. (in press). Salvinia molesta—a floating weed and its biological control. The Ecology of Exotic Animals and Plants in Australia (Ed. R.L. Kitching).Google Scholar
Room, P.M. & Thomas, P.A. (1985). Nitrogen and establishment of a beetle for biological control of the floating weed Salvinia in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Applied Ecology, 22, pp. 139156, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Room, P.M. & Thomas, P.A. (1986). Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in Salvinia molesta in the field: effects of weather, insect damage, fertilizers and age. Aquatic Botany, 24, pp. 213–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Room, P.M. & Thomas, P.A. (in press). Population growth of the floating weed Salvinia molesta: field observations and a global model based on temperature and nitrogen. Journal of Applied Ecology, 23 (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Room, P.M., Forno, I.W. & Taylor, M.F.J. (1984). Establishment in Australia of two insects for biological control of the floating weed Salvinia molesta. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 74, pp. 505–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Room, P.M., Harley, K.L.S., Forno, I.W. & Sands, D.P.A. (1981). Successful biological control of the floating weed salvinia. Nature [London], 294, pp. 7880, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, D.P.A., Schotz, M. & Bourne, A.S. (1983). The feeding characteristics and development of larvae of a Salvinia weevil Cyrtobagous sp. Entomologia Experimentalis el Applicata, 34, pp. 291–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P.A. (1979). Proposals for the Management of Salvinia molesta in Papua New Guinea. FAO Report to the Department of Primary Industry, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea: 60 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Thomas, P.A. (1985). The management of Salvinia molesta in Papua New Guinea. FOA Plant Protection Bulletin, 32, pp. 50–6, illustr.Google Scholar
Thomas, P.A. & Room, P.M. (1985). Towards biological control of Salvinia in Papua New Guinea. Pp. 567–74 in Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds (Ed. Dalfosse, E.S.). (Vancouver, 1984.) Canada Department of Agriculture [not available for checking].Google Scholar