Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T22:04:12.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

English in the linguistic landscape of Suzhou

Creative, fluid and transgressive English practices in a Chinese city

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2015

Songqing Li
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The concept of linguistic landscape (LL) covers all of the linguistic objects that mark the public space, i.e. any written sign one observes from road signs to advertising billboards, to the names of shops, streets or schools (Landry & Bourhis, 1997). Because it both shapes and is shaped by social and cultural associations (Ben-Rafael, 2009; Jaworski & Thurlow, 2010: 6–23), the LL has proved an important area for investigating the dynamics of major aspects of social life (e.g. Backhaus, 2006; Huebner, 2006; Curtin, 2009; Lado, 2011; Papen, 2012). One strand of this research is particularly concerned with the role of LL in relation to ethnolinguistic vitality that ‘makes a group likely to behave as a distinctive and active collective entity in intergroup relations’ (Giles, Bourhis & Taylor, 1977: 308). The higher the vitality an ethnolinguistic group enjoys, the more it will be able to use language so as to survive and thrive as a collective entity.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 27 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Backhaus, P. 2006. ‘Multilingualism in Tokyo: A look into the linguistic landscape.’ In Gorter, D. (ed.), Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Rafael, E. 2009. ‘A sociological approach to the study of linguistic landscapes.’ In Shohamy, E. & Gorter, D. (eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 40–54.Google Scholar
Chinadaily.com.cn. 2012. ‘Jiangsu Suzhu chengwei quanguo dier da yiming chengshi (lit. Suzhou in Jiangsu province becomes the 2nd biggest city of China to migrants).’ Online at <http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hqgj/jryw/2012-03-14/content_5412113.html> (Accessed May 8, 2014).+(Accessed+May+8,+2014).>Google Scholar
Curtin, M. L. 2009. ‘Languages on display: Indexical signs, identities and the linguistic landscape of Taipei.’ In Shohamy, E. & Gorter, D. (eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 221–37.Google Scholar
Franco-Rodriguez, J. M. 2009. ‘Interpreting the linguistic traits of linguistic landscape as ethnolinguistic vitality: Methodological approach.’ Revista Electronica de Linguistica Aplicada, 8, 1–15.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y. & Taylor, D. 1977. ‘Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations.’ In Giles, H. (ed.), Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press, pp. 307–48.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hill, A. A. 1985. ‘Puns: Their reality and their uses.’ International Journal of American Linguistics, 51(4), 449–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huebner, T. 2006. ‘Bangkok's linguistic landscapes: Environmental print, codemixing and language change.’ In Gorter, D. (ed.), Linguistic Landscape: A new approach to multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual, pp. 31–51.Google Scholar
Jaworski, A. & Thurlow, C. 2010. ‘Introducing semiotic landscapes.’ In Jaworski, A. & Thurlow, C. (eds.), Semiotic Landscapes: Language, image, space. London: Continuum, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
Lado, B. (2011) ‘Linguistic landscape as a reflection of the linguistic and ideological conflict in the Valencian Community.’ International Journal of Multilingualism, 8(2), 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landry, R. & Bourhis, R. Y. 1997. ‘Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study.’ Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49.Google Scholar
Makoni, S. & Pennycook, A. 2005. ‘Disinventing and reconstituting languages.’ Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 2(2), 137–56.Google Scholar
Nash, W. 2013. The Language of Humor. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Papen, U. 2012. ‘Commercial discourses, gentrification and citizens' protest: The linguistic landscape of Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin.’ Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(1), 56–80.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. 2007. Global Englishes and Transcultural Flow. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. 2009. ‘Linguistic landscapes and the transgressive semiotics of graffiti.’ In Shohamy, E. & Gorter, D. (eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 302–12.Google Scholar
Subaonet.com. 2014. ‘2013 nian Suzhou GDP paiming quanguo diliu renjun 12.2 wan (lit. In 2013 Suzhou's GDP ranked the 6th in China, 12,2000RMB per person).’ Online at <http://news.subaonet.com/2014/0304/1294730.shtml> (Accessed April 25, 2014). (Accessed April 25, 2014).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Subaonet.com.+2014.+‘2013+nian+Suzhou+GDP+paiming+quanguo+diliu+renjun+12.2+wan+(lit.+In+2013+Suzhou's+GDP+ranked+the+6th+in+China,+12,2000RMB+per+person).’+Online+at++(Accessed+April+25,+2014).>Google Scholar
Sun, C. 2006. Chinese: A Linguistic Introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xinhuanet.com. 2007. ‘Interview by the Xinhua News Agency with CPC Secretary of Suzhou.’ Online at <http://www.xinhuanet.com/lhft/20070304b> (Accessed July 26, 2011).+(Accessed+July+26,+2011).>Google Scholar