Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A Critical Investigation of English Language Teaching in Bangladesh: Unfulfilled expectations after two decades of Communicative Language Teaching

  • Mohammad Mosiur Rahman and Ambigapathy Pandian

Extract

The 2016 World Bank report on worldwide per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) identified Bangladesh as a lower middle-income country based on its consistent GDP growth throughout last decade (World Bank, 2016). To maintain this growth rate and meet the radical demand for human resources in increasingly globalised world markets, the country needs to communicate more effectively with the outside world. Inevitably, this means improving the quality of English teaching and learning. The significance of English, as the global lingua franca, to Bangladeshi learners is at its zenith. In this developing country, however, economic constraints mean that funds allocated to education are limited compared to many other Southeast Asian countries (Habib & Adhikary, 2016). Even given the generally low level of educational standards in Bangladesh (Islam, 2015), the standard of English language teaching and learning has decreased alarmingly in recent years (Hamid, 2011). English language education in Bangladesh has always been problematic, despite various attempts to initiate curriculum reform. As Hamid & Baldauf (2008) point out, the first of these major shifts in the ELT curriculum took place in the mid-1990s, when the traditional Grammar-Translation Method (GTM) was replaced with a curriculum based on a Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) model. The principal objective of this article is to review the major problems associated with ELT in Bangladesh that have hindered the implementation of the new CLT curriculum from the perspective of teachers, and eventually to make recommendations for more effective ELT curriculum reform.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A Critical Investigation of English Language Teaching in Bangladesh
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A Critical Investigation of English Language Teaching in Bangladesh
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A Critical Investigation of English Language Teaching in Bangladesh
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Abedin, M. M. 2012. ‘The present mode of teaching in the ELT classes at the Higher Secondary level in Bangladesh: Is it the practice of CLT or disguised GTM?Stamford Journal of English, 7, 115.
Abedin, M., Mojlis, K. & Akter, S. 2009. ‘Listening skills in tertiary level: A reflection’. The Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics, 2(3), 6990.
Ali, M. M. 2010. ‘Revisiting the English Language Teaching (ELT) curriculum design: How appropriate is Bangladesh higher secondary level national ELT curriculum as a learner-centred one?IIUC Studies, 7(1), 283–96.
Ali, M. & Walker, A. L. 2014. ‘“Bogged down” ELT in Bangladesh: Problems and policy.’ English Today, 30(2), 3338.
Banu, R. & Sussex, R. 2001. ‘English in Bangladesh after independence: Dynamics of policy and practice.’ In Moore, B. (ed.), Who's Centric Now? The Present State of Post-Colonial Englishes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 122147.
Canagarajah, A. S. 2005. Reclaiming the Local in Language Policy and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carter, R. & Nunan, D. 2001. The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chowdhury, R. & Ha, P. L. 2008. ‘Reflecting on Western TESOL training and communicative language teaching: Bangladeshi teachers’ voices.’ Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(3), 305316.
Chowdhury, R. & Kabir, A. H. 2014. ‘Language wars: English education policy and practice in Bangladesh.’ Multilingual Education, 4(1), 116.
Das, S., Shaheen, R., Shrestha, P., Rahman, A. & Khan, R. 2014. ‘Policy versus ground reality: Secondary English language assessment system in Bangladesh.’ Curriculum Journal, 25(3), 326343.
EIA (English in Action). 2010. ‘Baseline study 3: An observation of English lessons in primary and secondary schools in Bangladesh.’ Online at <http://www.eiabd.com/eia/index.php/publications/baseline-studies> (Accessed June 30, 2010).
Ellis, R. 2010. ‘Second language acquisition, teacher education and language pedagogy.’ Language Teaching, 43, 182201. doi:10.1017/S0261444809990139.
Fullan, M. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change, 4th edn. London & New York: Routledge.
Habib, W. & Adhikary, T. 2016. ‘Too inadequate to raise quality.’ The Daily Star, May 31, 2.
Hamid, M. O. 2010. ‘Globalisation, English for everyone and English teacher capacity: Language policy discourse and realities in Bangladesh.’ Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(4), 289310.
Hamid, M. O. 2011. ‘Planning for failure: English and language policy and planning in Bangladesh.’ In Fishman, J. A. and Garcia, O. (eds.), Handbook of Language and Ethnic identity. Volume 2, The Success-Failure Continuum in Language and Ethnic Identity Efforts, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 192203.
Hamid, M. O. & Baldauf, R. B. 2008. ‘Will CLT bail out the bogged down ELT in Bangladesh?English Today, 24(3), 1624.
Hamid, M. O. & Honan, E. 2012. ‘Communicative English in the primary classroom: Implications for English-in-education policy and practice in Bangladesh.’ Language, Culture and Curriculum, 25(2), 139156.
Hamid, M. O., Jahan, I. & Islam, M. M. 2013. ‘Medium of instruction policies and language practices, ideologies and institutional divides: Voices of teachers and students in a private university in Bangladesh.’ Current Issues in Language Planning 2013, 14(1), 144163. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2013.771417.
Hoque, K. E., Alam, G. M. & Abdullah, A. G. K. 2011. ‘Impact of teachers’ professional development on school improvement – An analysis at Bangladesh standpoint.’ Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(3), 337348.
Humphries, S. & Burns, A. 2015. ‘In reality it's almost impossible: CLT-oriented curriculum change.’ ELT Journal, 69(3), 239248.
Islam, S. M. A. 2015. ‘Language policy and practice in secondary school contexts in Bangladesh; Challenges to the Implementation of Language-in-Education Policy.’ Ph.D. thesis. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
Karim, H. B. B. A. 2004. A study of teachers’ perceptions of factors affecting curriculum change.’ Ed.D. dissertation. Penang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Khan, R. 2010. ‘English language assessment in Bangladesh: Developments and challenges.’ In Moon, Y. & Spolsky, B. (eds.). Language Assessment in Asia: Local, Regional or Global? Seoul: Asia TEFL, pp. 121157.
Kirkwood, A. T. & Rae, J. 2011. ‘A framework for evaluating qualitative changes in learners’ experience and engagement: Developing communicative English teaching and learning in Bangladesh.’ Evaluation & Research in Education, 24(3), 203216.
Kumaravadivelu, B. 2001. ‘Toward a post-method pedagogy.’ TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537557.
Littlewood, W. 2007. ‘Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms.’ Language Teaching, 40, 243249.
Marsh, C. J. & Willis, G. 2007. Curriculum: Alternative Approaches, Ongoing Issues, 4th edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
McArthur, D. 1996. Comment: Towards Designer English. ELT Journal, 50(4), 344346.
Ministry of Education. 2010. National Education Policy 2010. Dhaka: Ministry of Education.
NCTB (2001). ‘National Curriculum and Textbook Board (NCTB).’ Online at <http://www.nctb.gov.bd/> (Accessed November 14, 2016).
Nunan, D. 2003. ‘The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region.’ TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589613.
Rahman, M. S. 2015. ‘Implementing CLT at higher secondary level in Bangladesh: A review of change management.’ Journal of Education and Practice, 6(2), 93102.
Rahman, T. 2010. ‘A Multilingual language in education policy for indigenous minorities in Bangladesh: Challenges and possibilities.’ Current Issues in Language Planning 11(4), 341359.
Rahman, M. M. & Pandian, A. 2016. ‘The Gap between research and practice in the field of SLA: The rationale behind it and bridging the gap.’ Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(3), 162172.
Rahman, M. M., Hamzah, M. I. M., Meerah, T. S. M. & Rahman, M. 2010. ‘Historical development of secondary education in Bangladesh: Colonial period to 21st century.’ International Education Studies, 3(1), 114125.
Rahman, A., Kobir, M. M. & Afroze, R. 2006. Effect of BRACK-PACE Training on English Language Learning of Teachers in Rural Non-Government Secondary Schools. Dhaka: BRAC Centre.
Richards, J. C. 2008. ‘Second language teacher education today.’ RELC journal, 39(2), 158177.
Seargeant, P. & Erling, E. J. 2011. ‘The discourse of “English as a language for international development”: Policy assumptions and practical challenges.’ In Coleman, H. (ed.), Dreams and Realities: Developing Countries and the English Language. London: British Council.
Selim, A. & Mahboob, T. S. 2001. ‘ELT and English Language Teachers of Bangladesh: A profile.’ In Alam, F., Zaman, N. & Ahmed, T. (eds.), Revisioning English in Bangladesh. Dhaka: The University Press Limited, pp. 141151.
Siddique, R. 2004. ‘CLT: Another assumed ideal from the West.’ The Dhaka University Studies, Journal of the Faculty of Arts, 61(1), 1528.
Stockwell, R. 2015. ‘An exploratory study investigating the factors which explain Abu Dhabi Education Council's (Adec) English curriculum choice in grade 10/11 public high schools and the challenges its implementation poses for teachers.’ PhD thesis. Exeter: University of Exeter.
Sultana, D. & Nahar, S. A. 2008. ‘English Language Learning of Students at Primary Level in Bangladesh.’ Teacher's World: Journal of Education and Research, 32, 113123.
Wang, H. & Cheng, L. 2008. ‘The impact of curriculum innovation on the cultures of teaching.’ The Chinese English Foreign Language Journal, 1(1), 530.
World Bank. 2016. ‘GDP growth (annual %).’ Online at <http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?page=1> (Accessed May 31, 2016).
Yasmin, F. 2009. ‘Attitude of Bangladeshi students towards Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and their English textbook.’ Teacher's World: Journal of Education and Research, 34, 4959.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

A Critical Investigation of English Language Teaching in Bangladesh: Unfulfilled expectations after two decades of Communicative Language Teaching

  • Mohammad Mosiur Rahman and Ambigapathy Pandian

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.