Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T21:12:02.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘ph’ of English orthography; a digraph or a sequence of separate phonemes?

Responding to Alan S. Kaye

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2017

Blasius Achiri-Taboh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The aim of this short article is to offer a belated defense of L. M. Boyd (author of a daily, nationally syndicated column ‘Trivia’ in numerous newspapers throughout the USA) against a critique published in English Today over a decade ago by Alan S. Kaye (2006), and present arguments in support of Boyd's beleaguered claim. Kaye (2006: 54) writes:

I do not mean to be picking on Mr. Boyd, but considering his track record, perhaps the time has come for his quitting pontificating on matters of English grammar, pronunciation, and the history of the language.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 47 - 49
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kaye, A. S. 2006. ‘Linguistic note on English orthography and current usage.’ English Today, 22(1), 54–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607840600109X.Google Scholar
Korhenen, M. 2015. ‘Spelling the extra letter? The case of Australian English: Surveying spelling variation across generations in Australian English.’ English Today, 31(1), 5–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078414000492.Google Scholar