Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

GAME THEORY: A PRACTITIONER'S APPROACH

  • Thomas C. Schelling (a1)

Abstract

To a practitioner in the social sciences, game theory primarily helps to identify situations in which interdependent decisions are somehow problematic; solutions often require venturing into the social sciences. Game theory is usually about anticipating each other's choices; it can also cope with influencing other's choices. To a social scientist the great contribution of game theory is probably the payoff matrix, an accounting device comparable to the equals sign in algebra.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Allison, G. T. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd edn, with Philip Zelikow, 1999. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
Camerer, C. F. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation, Princeton University Press.
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H. 1957. Games and Decisions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Myerson, R. B. 1991. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schelling, T. C. 1958. The strategy of conflict: prospectus for a reorientation of game theory. Journal of Conflict Resolution II, No. 3.
Schelling, T. C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schelling, T. C. 1984. Choice and Consequence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

GAME THEORY: A PRACTITIONER'S APPROACH

  • Thomas C. Schelling (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed