Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T08:00:00.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXVIII.—The Arrangement of Fibre Follicles in some Mammals, with special reference tothe Ovidæ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

J. E. Duerden
J. E. Duerden
Affiliation:
Emeritus Professor ofRhodes University, Grahamstown
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At the time of his death Dr Duerden was contemplating the preparation of a paper of this nature, and it is felt by Mrs Duerden that had he been able to express his wishes in this connection he would appreciate a record of the conclusions made by him. No one realised more than Dr Duerden himself the gaps which are still present in our knowledge and interpretation of the grouping of follicles and fibres in the mammalia, and this work is certainly not meant to be taken as representing Dr Duerden's final view or those of his colleagues at the Wool Industries Research Association. In view of the unique value of much of the material the present notes are intended, therefore, to form a basis and reference, firstly, for workers engaged in the general development of any mammalian coat from a morphogenic and phylogenetic point of view, and secondly, for those interested particularly in factors concerned in the formation of different types of fleeces in sheep. The conception of the follicle bundle as a discrete and basic genetic unit largely determining the initial form of the wool staple is of the highest importance in studies on the inheritance and developmentof fleece characters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , 1939 , pp. 763 - 771
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Bütschli, O., 1910, 1912, 1921. Vorlesungen über vergleichende Anatomie Lief. 1, 2, 3, Springer 1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerden, J. E., and Ritchie, M. I. F., 1924. “Development of the Merino Wool Fibre,” S. Afr. Journ. Sci., vol. xxi, pp. 480–497.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W., 1935. N.Z. Journ. Agric., vol. li, no. 4, pp. 229–237.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W., 1936. Roy. Agric. Soc. N.Z., Gaz. 14, May.Google Scholar
Galpin, N., 1935. “Pre-Natal Development of the Coat of the New Zealand Romney Lamb,” Journ. Agric. Sci., vol. xxv, pt. iii, pp. 344–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Helena F., 1938. “A study of the Development of the Skin and Hair of the Australian Opossum, Trichosurus vulpecula,” Proc. Zool. Soc. London, ser. B, vol. cviii, pt. iii.Google Scholar
Hosang, , 1894. “Unterschied in der Haarstellung zwischen Schaf und Zeigenhaut,” Dtsch. Tierärztl. Wschr, vol. ii, 333–334.Google Scholar
De Meijere, J. C. H., 1894. “Über die Haare der Saügetiere besonders über ihre Anordnung,” Morphol. Jb., vol. xxi, Hft. iii, pp. 312–415.Google Scholar
Tänzer, E., 1926. Haut und Haar beim Karakul im rassenanalytischen Vergleich, p. 77.Google Scholar
Toldt, K. 1935. Aufbau und natürliche Farbung des Haarkleides der Wildsäugetiere, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kleintier- und Pelztierzucht, G.m.b.H. & Co., Leipzig, 1935.Google Scholar
Wildman, A. B., 1932. “Coat and Fibre Development in some British Sheep,” Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pt. ii, pp. 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. A., 1928. Chemistry of Leather Manufacture, vol. i, pp. 19–75, Chemical Catalog Co., N.Y.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. A., 1937. Wool Industries Research Assoc. Bulletin, January.Google Scholar