Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T10:43:44.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biological sensitivity to context as a dyadic construct: An investigation of child–parent RSA synchrony among low-SES youth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Assaf Oshri*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Program, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
Sihong Liu
Affiliation:
Stress Neurobiology and Prevention Lab, Center for Translational Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Cynthia M. Suveg
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
Margaret O’Brien Caughy
Affiliation:
Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
Landry Goodgame Huffman
Affiliation:
Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Program, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
*
Author for Correspondence: Assaf Oshri, Youth Development Institute, Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, 208 Family Science Center A, 403 Sanford Dr., Athens, GA, 30602; E-mail: oshri@uga.edu

Abstract

Parenting behaviors are significantly linked to youths’ behavioral adjustment, an association that is moderated by youths’ and parents’ self-regulation. The biological sensitivity to context theory suggests that respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) indexes youths’ varying susceptibility to rearing contexts. However, self-regulation in the family context is increasingly viewed as a process of “coregulation” that is biologically embedded and involves dynamic Parent×Child interactions. No research thus far has examined physiological synchrony as a dyadic biological context that may moderate associations between parenting behaviors and preadolescent adjustment. Using a two-wave sample of 101 low-socioeconomic status (SES) families (children and caretakers; mean age 10.28 years), we employed multilevel modeling to examine dyadic coregulation during a conflict task, indicated by RSA synchrony, as a moderator of the linkages between observed parenting behaviors and preadolescents’ internalizing and externalizing problems. Results showed that high dyadic RSA synchrony resulted in a multiplicative association between parenting and youth adjustment. High dyadic synchrony intensified the relations between parenting behaviors and youth behavior problems, such that in the context of high dyadic synchrony, positive and negative parenting behaviors were associated with decreased and increased behavioral problems, respectively. Parent–child dyadic RSA synchrony is discussed as a potential biomarker of biological sensitivity in youth.

Type
Regular Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper is dedicated to my mentor and friend Fred A. Rogosch, who introduced me to biological sensitivity to context theory.

References

Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18. YSR, and TRF profiles. Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. (1991). Child behavior checklist. Burlington (Vt), 7, 371392.Google Scholar
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Tempe, AZ: Sage.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Bell, K. L., & O'Connor, T. G. (1994). Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem. Child Development, 65, 179194. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00743.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appelhans, B. M., & Luecken, L. J. (2006). Heart rate variability as an index of regulated emotional responding. Review of General Psychology, 10, 229240. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.3.229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to rearing environment depending on dopamine-related genes: New evidence and a meta-analysis. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 3952. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000635CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885. doi:10.1037/a0017376CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berntson, G. G., Quigley, K. S., Jang, J. F., & Boysen, S. T. (1990). An approach to artifact identification: Application to heart period data. Psychophysiology, 27, 586598. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb01982.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bocknek, E. L., Richardson, P. A., McGoron, L., Raveau, H., & Iruka, I. U. (2020). Adaptive parenting Among Low-income black mothers and toddlers’ regulation of distress. Child Development, 91, 21782191. doi:10.1111/cdev.13461CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary–developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 271301. doi:10.1017/S0954579405050145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branje, S. (2018). Development of parent–adolescent relationships: Conflict interactions as a mechanism of change. Child Development Perspectives, 12, 171176. doi:10.1111/cdep.12278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Bubier, J. L., Drabick, D. A., & Breiner, T. (2009). Autonomic functioning moderates the relations between contextual factors and externalizing behaviors among inner-city children. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 500. doi:10.1037/a0015555CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, J. D., Pardini, D. A., & Loeber, R. (2008). Reciprocal relationships between parenting behavior and disruptive psychopathology from childhood through adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 679692. doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9219-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calkins, S. D., Propper, C., & Mills-Koonce, W. R. (2013). A biopsychosocial perspective on parenting and developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 13991414. doi:10.1017/S0954579413000680CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caughy, M. O. B., Mills, B., Owen, M. T., Dyer, N., & Oshri, A. (2017). Ethnic differences in mothering qualities and relations to academic achievement. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 855. doi:10.1037/fam0000334CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, E. C., Wilkinson, K., & Stroud, L. R. (2018). The role of stress response in the association between autonomy and adjustment in adolescents. Physiology & Behavior, 189, 4049. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creavy, K. L., Gatzke-Kopp, L. M., Zhang, X., Fishbein, D., & Kiser, L. J. (2020). When you go low, I go high: Negative coordination of physiological synchrony among parents and children. Developmental Psychobiology, 62, 310323. doi:10.1002/dev.21905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, L., Morris, A. S., Harrist, A. W., Larzelere, R. E., & Criss, M. M. (2015). Dynamic changes in parent affect and adolescent cardiac vagal regulation: A real-time analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, M., West, K., Bilms, J., Morelen, D., & Suveg, C. (2018). A systematic review of parent-child synchrony: It is more than skin deep. Developmental Psychobiology, 60, 674691. doi:10.1002/dev.21743CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 119. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deane, C., Vijayakumar, N., Allen, N. B., Schwartz, O., Simmons, J. G., Bousman, C. A., … Whittle, S. (2020). Parenting× brain development interactions as predictors of adolescent depressive symptoms and well-being: Differential susceptibility or diathesis-stress? Development and Psychopathology, 32, 139150. doi:10.1017/S0954579418001475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Giudice, M. (2017). Statistical tests of differential susceptibility: Performance, limitations, and improvements. Development and Psychopathology, 29, 12671278. doi:10.1017/S0954579416001292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, L. M., Fagundes, C. P., & Cribbet, M. R. (2012). Individual differences in adolescents’ sympathetic and parasympathetic functioning moderate associations between family environment and psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 48, 918. doi:10.1037/a0026901CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrlich, K. B., Dykas, M. J., & Cassidy, J. (2012). Tipping points in adolescent adjustment: Predicting social functioning from adolescents’ conflict with parents and friends. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 776. doi:10.1037/a0029868CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Sheikh, M., & Flanagan, E. (2001). Parental problem drinking and children's adjustment: Family conflict and parental depression as mediators and moderators of risk. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 417432. doi:10.1023/A:1010447503252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Sheikh, M., Harger, J., & Whitson, S. M. (2001). Exposure to interparental conflict and children's adjustment and physical health: The moderating role of vagal tone. Child Development, 72, 16171636. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00369CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Sheikh, M., Kouros, C. D., Erath, S., Cummings, E. M., Keller, P., & Staton, L. (2009). Marital conflict and children's externalizing behavior: Pathways involving interactions between parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system activity. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 74, vii. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2009.00501.xGoogle Scholar
El-Sheikh, M., & Whitson, S. A. (2006). Longitudinal relations between marital conflict and child adjustment: Vagal regulation as a protective factor. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 30. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.1.30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 728. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Essex, M. J., & Boyce, W. T. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: II. Empirical explorations of an evolutionary–developmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 303328. doi:10.1017/S0954579405050157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. J., Shirtcliff, E. A., Boyce, W. T., Deardorff, J., & Essex, M. J. (2011). Quality of early family relationships and the timing and tempo of puberty: Effects depend on biological sensitivity to context. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 85. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000660CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ernst, J. M., Litvack, D. A., Lozano, D. L., Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). Impedance pneumography: Noise as signal in impedance cardiography. Psychophysiology, 36, 333338. doi:10.1017/S0048577299981003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. (2003). Infant–mother and infant–father synchrony: The coregulation of positive arousal. Infant Mental Health Journal: Official Publication of The World Association for Infant Mental Health, 24, 123. doi:10.1002/imhj.10041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. (2007). Parent–infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 329354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. (2010). The relational basis of adolescent adjustment: Trajectories of mother–child interactive behaviors from infancy to adolescence shape adolescents' adaptation. Attachment & Human Development, 12, 173192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. (2012). Bio-behavioral synchrony: A model for integrating biological and microsocial behavioral processes in the study of parenting. Parenting-Science and Practice, 12, 154164. doi:10.1080/15295192.2012.683342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R., Singer, M., & Zagoory, O. (2010). Touch attenuates infants’ physiological reactivity to stress. Developmental Science, 13, 271278. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00890.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gates, K. M., Gatzke-Kopp, L. M., Sandsten, M., & Blandon, A. Y. (2015). Estimating time-varying RSA to examine psychophysiological linkage of marital dyads. Psychophysiology, 52, 10591065. doi:10.1111/psyp.12428CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giuliano, R. J., Skowron, E. A., & Berkman, E. T. (2015). Growth models of dyadic synchrony and mother–child vagal tone in the context of parenting at-risk. Biological Psychology, 105, 2936. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueron-Sela, N., Wagner, N. J., Propper, C. B., Mills-Koonce, W. R., Moore, G. A., & Cox, M. J. (2017). The interaction between child respiratory sinus arrhythmia and early sensitive parenting in the prediction of children's executive functions. Infancy, 22, 171189. doi:10.1111/infa.12152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hankin, B., Nederhof, E., Oppenheimer, C., Jenness, J., Young, J., Abela, J., … Oldehinkel, A. (2011). Differential susceptibility in youth: Evidence that 5-HTTLPR x positive parenting is associated with positive affect “for better and worse’. Translational Psychiatry, 1, e44. doi:10.1038/tp.2011.44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helm, J. L., Miller, J. G., Kahle, S., Troxel, N. R., & Hastings, P. D. (2018). On measuring and modeling physiological synchrony in dyads. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 521543. doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1459292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbers, J. E., Cutuli, J., Supkoff, L. M., Narayan, A. J., & Masten, A. S. (2014). Parenting and coregulation: Adaptive systems for competence in children experiencing homelessness. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84, 420. doi:10.1037/h0099843CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holzman, J. B., & Bridgett, D. J. (2017). Heart rate variability indices as bio-markers of top-down self-regulatory mechanisms: A meta-analytic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 74, 233255. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.032CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hox, J. J., Maas, C. J. M., & Brinkhuis, M. J. S. (2010). The effect of estimation method and sample size in multilevel structural equation modeling. Statistica Neerlandica, 64, 157170. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00445.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, L. G., Oshri, A., & Caughy, M. (2020). An autonomic nervous system context of harsh parenting and youth aggression versus delinquency. Biological Psychology, 156, 107966. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107966CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobak, R., Abbott, C., Zisk, A., & Bounoua, N. (2017). Adapting to the changing needs of adolescents: Parenting practices and challenges to sensitive attunement. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 137142. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobak, R. R., Cole, H. E., Ferenz-Gillies, R., Fleming, W. S., & Gamble, W. (1993). Attachment and emotion regulation during mother-teen problem solving: A control theory analysis. Child Development, 64, 231245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (1994). Interpersonal conflict during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 197. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (2009). Parent–child relationships during adolescence. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, 2, doi:10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Sturge-Apple, M. L., Liu, S., & Davies, P. T. (2020). Parent-adolescent physiological synchrony: Moderating effects of adolescent emotional insecurity. Psychophysiology, 57, e13596. doi:10.1111/psyp.13596CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, S., Oshri, A., Kogan, S. M., Wickrama, K. A. S., & Sweet, L. (2021). Amygdalar activation as a neurobiological marker of differential sensitivity in the effects of family rearing experiences on socioemotional adjustment in youths. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.04.017Google ScholarPubMed
Lunkenheimer, E., Busuito, A., Brown, K. M., Panlilio, C., & Skowron, E. A. (2019). The interpersonal neurobiology of child maltreatment: Parasympathetic substrates of interactive repair in maltreating and nonmaltreating mother–child dyads. Child Maltreatment, 24, 353363. doi:10.1177/1077559518824058CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lunkenheimer, E. S., Olson, S. L., Hollenstein, T., Sameroff, A. J., & Winter, C. (2011). Dyadic flexibility and positive affect in parent–child coregulation and the development of child behavior problems. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 577. doi:10.1017/S095457941100006XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lunkenheimer, E., Tiberio, S. S., Buss, K. A., Lucas-Thompson, R. G., Boker, S. M., & Timpe, Z. C. (2015). Coregulation of respiratory sinus arrhythmia between parents and preschoolers: Differences by children's externalizing problems. Developmental Psychobiology, 57, 9941003. doi:10.1002/dev.21323CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lunkenheimer, E., Tiberio, S. S., Skoranski, A. M., Buss, K. A., & Cole, P. M. (2018). Parent-child coregulation of parasympathetic processes varies by social context and risk for psychopathology. Psychophysiology, 55, e12985. doi:10.1111/psyp.12985CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupien, S. J., McEwen, B. S., Gunnar, M. R., & Heim, C. (2009). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 434. doi:10.1038/nrn2639CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In Cicchetti, D., & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 739795). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Martin, A., Owen, M. T., Hetzner, N. P., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2008). Early Head Start 5th Grade Follow-Up Study Videotaped Parent-Child Interaction Instructions for Coding Child and Parent Scales.Google Scholar
McKillop, H. N., & Connell, A. M. (2018). Physiological linkage and affective dynamics in dyadic interactions between adolescents and their mothers. Developmental Psychobiology, 60, 582594. doi:10.1002/dev.21630CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, A. S., Cui, L., Criss, M. M., & Simmons, W. K.. (2018). Emotion regulation dynamics during parent–child interactions: Implications for research and practice. In Emotion Regulation (pp. 7090). Oxford, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, A. S., Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., Myers, S. S., & Robinson, L. R. (2007). The role of the family context in the development of emotion regulation. Social Development, 16, 361388. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00389.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthén, L. K., & Muthen, B. (2017). Mplus user's guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables, user's guide. Los Angeles, California: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Obradović, J., & Boyce, W. T. (2012). Developmental psychophysiology of emotion processes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 77, 120128. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2011.00670.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obradović, J., Bush, N. R., & Boyce, W. T. (2011). The interactive effect of marital conflict and stress reactivity on externalizing and internalizing symptoms: The role of laboratory stressors. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 101114. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000672CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obradović, J., Bush, N. R., Stamperdahl, J., Adler, N. E., & Boyce, W. T. (2010). Biological sensitivity to context: The interactive effects of stress reactivity and family adversity on socioemotional behavior and school readiness. Child Development, 81, 270289. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01394.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oshri, A., Duprey, E. B., Liu, S., & Ehrlich, K. B. (2020). Harsh parenting and youth systemic inflammation: Modulation by the autonomic nervous system. Health Psychology, 39, 482496. doi:10.1037/hea0000852CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oshri, A., Liu, S., Huffman, L. G., & Koss, K. J. (2021). Firm parenting and youth adjustment: Stress reactivity and dyadic synchrony of respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Developmental Psychobiology, 63(3), 470480. doi:10.1002/dev.22019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oshri, A., Rogosch, F. A., Burnette, M. L., & Cicchetti, D. (2011). Developmental pathways to adolescent Cannabis abuse and dependence: Child maltreatment, emerging personality, and internalizing versus externalizing psychopathology. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 634644. doi:10.1037/a0023151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oshri, A., Rogosch, F. A., & Cicchetti, D. (2013). Child maltreatment and mediating influences of childhood personality types on the development of adolescent psychopathology. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42, 287301. doi:10.1080/15374416.2012.715366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluess, M. (2015). Individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 138143. doi:10.1111/cdep.12120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2010). Children's differential susceptibility to effects of parenting. Family Science, 1, 1425. doi:10.1080/19424620903388554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2013). Vantage sensitivity: Individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 901. doi:10.1037/a0030196CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation (Norton series on interpersonal neurobiology). New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, J. A., Drabick, D. A. G., Reynolds, M. D., Clark, D. B., & Olino, T. M. (2016). Child temperamental flexibility moderates the relation between positive parenting and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 43, 4353. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2015.12.006vCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roisman, G. I., Newman, D. A., Fraley, R. C., Haltigan, J. D., Groh, A. M., & Haydon, K. C. (2012). Distinguishing differential susceptibility from diathesis–stress: Recommendations for evaluating interaction effects. Development Psychopathology, 24, 389409. doi:10.1017/S0954579412000065CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, D. B., & Little, R. J. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken, NJ: J Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rudd, K. L., Alkon, A., & Yates, T. M. (2017). Prospective relations between intrusive parenting and child behavior problems: Differential moderation by parasympathetic nervous system regulation and child sex. Physiology & Behavior, 180, 120130. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.08.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneiderman, I., Kanat-Maymon, Y., Zagoory-Sharon, O., & Feldman, R. (2014). Mutual influences between partners’ hormones shape conflict dialog and relationship duration at the initiation of romantic love. Social Neuroscience, 9, 337351. doi:10.1080/17470919.2014.903712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serbin, L. A., Kingdon, D., Ruttle, P. L., & Stack, D. M. (2015). The impact of children's internalizing and externalizing problems on parenting: Transactional processes and reciprocal change over time. Development and Psychopathology, 27, 969986. doi:10.1017/S0954579415000632CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shader, T. M., Gatzke-Kopp, L. M., Crowell, S. E., Reid, M. J., Thayer, J. F., Vasey, M. W., … Beauchaine, T. P. (2018). Quantifying respiratory sinus arrhythmia: Effects of misspecifying breathing frequencies across development. Development and Psychopathology, 30, 351366. doi:10.1017/S0954579417000669CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shakiba, N., Ellis, B. J., Bush, N. R., & Boyce, W. T. (2019). Biological sensitivity to context: A test of the hypothesized U-shaped relation between early adversity and stress responsivity. Development and Psychopathology, 32(2), 641660. doi:10.1017/S0954579419000518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sijtsema, J. J., Nederhof, E., Veenstra, R., Ormel, J., Oldehinkel, A. J., & Ellis, B. J. (2013). Effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity on aggressive/rule-breaking behavior and prosocial behavior in adolescence: The tracking adolescents’ individual lives survey study. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 699712. doi:10.1017/S0954579413000114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skibo, M. A., Sturge-Apple, M. L., & Suor, J. H. (2020). Early experiences of insensitive caregiving and children's self-regulation: Vagal tone as a differential susceptibility factor. Development and Psychopathology, 32(4), 14601472. doi:10.1017/S0954579419001408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skoranski, A. M., Lunkenheimer, E., & Lucas-Thompson, R. G. (2017). The effects of maternal respiratory sinus arrhythmia and behavioral engagement on mother-child physiological coregulation. Developmental Psychobiology, 59, 888898. doi:10.1002/dev.21543CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skowron, E. A., Cipriano-Essel, E., Gatzke-Kopp, L. M., Teti, D. M., & Ammerman, R. T. (2014). Early adversity, RSA, and inhibitory control: Evidence of children's neurobiological sensitivity to social context. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 964978. doi:10.1002/dev.21175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slagt, M., Dubas, J. S., Deković, M., & van Aken, M. A. (2016). Differences in sensitivity to parenting depending on child temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1068. doi:10.1037/bul0000061CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slagt, M., Dubas, J. S., Ellis, B. J., Van Aken, M. A., & Deković, M. (2019). Linking emotional reactivity “for better and for worse” to differential susceptibility to parenting among kindergartners. Development and Psychopathology, 31, 741758. doi:10.1017/S0954579418000445CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith-Bynum, M., & Brody, G. (2005). Coping behaviors, parenting, and perceptions of children's internalizing and externalizing problems in rural African American mothers. Family Relations, 54, 5871. doi:10.1111/j.0197-6664.2005.00006.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suveg, C., Braunstein West, K., Davis, M., Caughy, M., Smith, E. P., & Oshri, A. (2019). Symptoms and synchrony: Mother and child internalizing problems moderate respiratory sinus arrhythmia concordance in mother–preadolescent dyads. Developmental Psychology, 55, 366. doi:10.1037/dev0000648CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, R. D., Lopez, E. I., Budescu, M., & McGill, R. K. (2012). Parenting practices and adolescent internalizing and externalizing problems: Moderating effects of socially demanding kin relations. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21, 474485. doi:10.1007/s10826-011-9501-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2007). Behavioral outcomes of parent-child interaction therapy and triple P—positive parenting program: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 475495. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9104-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, C. A., Xue, Y., Moiduddin, E. M., Carlson, B. L., & Kisker, E. E. (n.d.). Early Head Start children in grade 5: long-term follow-up of the Early Head Start research and evaluation project study sample. Mathematica Policy Research Reports 4e81525b2ed848808383ce904, Mathematica Policy Research.Google Scholar
Weller, J. A., & Fisher, P. A. (2013). Decision-making deficits among maltreated children. Child Maltreatment, 18, 184194. doi:10.1177/1077559512467846CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witherington, D. C., & Lickliter, R. (2016). Integrating development and evolution in psychological science: Evolutionary developmental psychology, developmental systems, and explanatory pluralism. Human Development, 59, 200234. doi:10.1159/000450715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woltering, S., Lishak, V., Elliott, B., Ferraro, L., & Granic, I. (2015). Dyadic attunement and physiological synchrony during mother-child interactions: An exploratory study in children with and without externalizing behavior problems. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37, 624633. doi:10.1007/s10862-015-9480-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woody, M. L., Feurer, C., Sosoo, E. E., Hastings, P. D., & Gibb, B. E. (2016). Synchrony of physiological activity during mother–child interaction: Moderation by maternal history of major depressive disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 843850. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12562CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 165200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Y., Pasalich, D. S., Oberth, C., McMahon, R. J., & Pinderhughes, E. E. (2017). Capturing parenting as a multidimensional and dynamic construct with a person-oriented approach. Prevention Science, 18, 281291. doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0665-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed