Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Regulation of “Religion” and the “Religious”: The Politics of Judicialization and Bureaucratization in India and Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2014

Yüksel Sezgin
Affiliation:
Syracuse University
Mirjam Künkler
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

This article compares the strategies through which Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Indonesia have regulated religion and addressed questions of what constitutes “the religious” in the post-independence period. We show that the dominant approach pursued by the Indian state has been one of judicialization—the delegation of religious questions to the high courts—while in Indonesia it has predominantly been one of bureaucratization—the regulation of religious issues by the Ministry of Religious Affairs. Contrary to the expectation that judicialization devitalizes normative conflicts while bureaucratization, more frequently associated with authoritarian politics, “locks” these conflicts “in,” we show that these expectations have not materialized, and at times, the effects have been reverse. Engaging the literatures on judicialization and on bureaucratization, we argue that what determines the consequences of the policy toward religion is less the choice of the implementing institution (i.e., the judiciary or bureaucracy) than the mode of delegation (vertical versus horizontal) which shapes the relationship between the policy-maker and the institution implementing it. Bureaucrats, judges, and elected politicians in multicultural societies around the world encounter questions of religious nature very similar to those that authorities in India and Indonesia have faced. How they address the challenge of religious heterogeneity has a profound impact on prospects of nation-building and democratization. It is therefore imperative that the consequences of the policy toward religion, and even more so the consequences of political delegation, be studied more systematically.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Abalahin, A. J. 2005. A Sixth Religion? Confucianism and the Negotiation of Indonesian Chinese Identity under the Pancasila State. In Willford, A. C. and George, K. M., eds., Spirited Politics: Religion and Public Life in Contemporary Southeast Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 119–42.Google Scholar
Agnes, F. 2007. The Supreme Court, the Media, and the Uniform Civil Code Debate in India. In Needham, A. D. and Rajan, R. Sunder, eds., The Crisis of Secularism in India. Durham: Duke University Press, 294315.Google Scholar
Aragon, L. V. 2000. Fields of the Lord: Animism, Christian Minorities, and State Development in Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. 1987. Religions in Dialogue: The Construction of an Indonesian Minority Religion. In Kipp, R. S. and Rodgers, S., eds., Indonesian Religions in Transition. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 171–86.Google Scholar
Benda, H. J. 1958. The Crescent and the Rising Sun; Indonesian Islam under the Japanese Occupation, 1942–1945. The Hague: W. van Hoeve. Distributed by the Institute of Pacific Relations.Google Scholar
Bhargava, R. 2002. What Is Indian Secularism and What Is It For? Indian Review 1, 1: 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, J. 2013. Contours of Shari'a in Indonesia. In Künkler, M. and Stepan, A. C., eds., Democratization and Islam in Indonesia. New York: Columbia University Press, 149–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, S. 2008. Polygamy and Mixed Marriage in Indonesia: Islam and Marriage Law in the Courts. In Lindsey, T., ed., Indonesia: Law and Society. Singapore: ISEAS, 266–87.Google Scholar
Butt, S. 2010. Islam, the State and the Constitutional Court in Indonesia. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 19, 2: 279301.Google Scholar
Cammack, M., Young, L. A., and Heaton, T.. 2008. Indonesia's Marriage Law. In Lindsey, T., ed., Indonesia: Law and Society. Singapore: ISEAS, 288312.Google Scholar
Casanova, J. 2006. Rethinking Secularism: A Global Comparative Perspective. Hedgehog Review, 8, 1–2: 722.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, B. 2008. Indian Politics and Society since Independence: Events, Processes and Ideology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chalmers, I. 2006. Indonesia: An Introduction to Contemporary Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, B., Mukherjee, A., and Mukherjee, M.. 1999. India after Independence. New Delhi and London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Cossman, B. and Kapur, R.. 2001. Secularism's Last Sigh?: Hindutva and the (Mis)rule of Law. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, M. A. 2012. Law and Religion in Indonesia: The Constitutional Court and the Blasphemy Law. Asian Journal of Comparative Law 7, 1: 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, G. 2000. The Supreme Court: An Overview. In Kirpal, B. N., Desai, A. H., and Subramanium, G., eds., Supreme but Not Infallible: Essays in Honour of the Supreme Court of India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1647.Google Scholar
De Bary, W. T., Gluck, C., Tiedemann, A. E., Boot, W. J. J., and Bodiford, W. M.. 2006. Sources of Japanese Tradition, Part II (1868–2000). 2d ed.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Derrett, J. D. M. 1999. Religion, Law and the State in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dhavan, R. 2001. The Road to Xanadu: India's Quest for Secularism. In Larson, G. J., ed., Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: A Call to Judgment. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 301–29.Google Scholar
Dhavan, R. 2007. Governance by Judiciary: Into the Next Millennium. In Dua, B. D., Singh, M. P., and Saxena, R., eds., Indian Judiciary and Politics. New Delhi: Manohar, 73106.Google Scholar
Dhavan, R. and Nariman, F. S.. 2000. The Supreme Court and Group Life: Religious Freedom, Minority Groups, and Disadvantaged Communities. In Kirpal, B. N., Desai, A. H., and Subramanium, G., eds., Supreme but Not Infallible: Essays in Honour of the Supreme Court of India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 256–87.Google Scholar
Eisgruber, C. L. and Sager, L. G.. 2007. Religious Freedom and the Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmerson, D. K. 1978. The Bureaucracy in Political Context: Weakness in Strength. In Jackson, K. D. and Pye, L. W., eds., Political Power and Communications in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 82136.Google Scholar
Federspiel, H. M. 1998. Islamic Values, Law, and Expectations in Contemporary Indonesia. Islamic Law and Society 5, 1: 90117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. 2006. World Separation of Religion and State into the Twenty First Century. Comparative Political Studies 39, 5: 537–69.Google Scholar
Freston, P. 2001. Evangelicals and Politics in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, M. 1989. Law and Society in Modern India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1960. The Religion of Java. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. and Moustafa, T.. 2008. Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginting, J. T. 2004. The Position of Hinduism in Karo Society (North Sumatra). In Ramstedt, M., ed., Hinduism in Modern Indonesia: A Minority Religion between Local, National, and Global Interests. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 226–41.Google Scholar
Handberg, R. 1999. Judicialization across Societies: The Spread of Judicial Power and Societal Change. International Journal of Public Administration 22, 8: 1269–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, T. B. 1999. The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hardacre, H. 1989. Shinto and the State, 1868–1988. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Z. 1994. Minority Identity, State Policy and the Political Process. In Hasan, Z., ed., Forging Identities: Gender, Communities and the State. New Delhi: Kali for Women, 5973.Google Scholar
Hefner, R. W. 2004. Hindu Reform in an Islamizing Java: Pluralism and Peril. In Ramstedt, M., ed., Hinduism in Modern Indonesia: A Minority Religion between Local, National, and Global Interests. New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 93108.Google Scholar
Heriyanto Yang, Y. 2005. The History and Legal Position of Confucianism in Postindependence Indonesia. Marburg Journal of Religion 10, 1: 18.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R. 2008. The Theocratic Challenge to Constitution Drafting in Post-Conflict States. William and Mary Law Review 49, 4: 1179–211.Google Scholar
Howell, J. D. 1982. Indonesia: Searching for Consensus. In Caldarola, C., ed., Religions and Societies, Asia and the Middle East. New York: Mouton, 497548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intan, B. F. 2006. “Public Religion” and the Pancasila-Based State of Indonesia: An Ethical and Sociological Analysis. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Irianto, S. 2005. Race and Gender Discrimination in a Socio-Legal Perspective: The Experience of Chinese Indonesian Women in Indonesia. In Lindholt, L. and Schaumburg-Müller, S., eds., Human Rights in Development Yearbook: Human Rights and Local/Living Law. Oslo: Martinus Nijhoff, 235–63.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, G. J. 2003. The Wheel of Law: India's Secularism in Comparative Constitutional Context. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, S. 2013. Indonesian Government Approaches to Radical Islam since 1998. In Künkler, M. and Stepan, A. C., eds., Democratization and Islam in Indonesia. New York: Columbia University Press, 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipp, R. S. 1993. Dissociated Identities: Ethnicity, Religion, and Class in an Indonesian Society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipp, R. S. and Rodgers, S.. 1987. Indonesian Religions in Transition. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Kopf, D. 1979. The Brahmo Samaj and the Shaping of the Modern Indian Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kusuma, A. B. and Elson, R. E.. 2011. A Note on the Sources for the 1945 Constitutional Debates in Indonesia. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 167, 2/3: 196209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev, D. S. 1972. Islamic Courts in Indonesia: A Study in the Political Bases of Legal Institutions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lev, D. S. 2000. Legal Evolution and Political Authority in Indonesia: Selected Essays. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Lukito, R. 2003. Law and Politics in Post-Independence Indonesia: A Case Study of Religious and Adat Courts. In Salim, A. and Azra, A., eds., Shari‘a and Politics in Modern Indonesia. Singapore: ISEAS, 1732.Google Scholar
Mahajan, G. 2002. Secularism as Religious Non-Discrimination: The Universal and the Particular in the Indian Context. Indian Review 1, 1: 3351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, S. T. 1995. Uniform Civil Code: Fictions and Facts. New Delhi: India and Islam Research Council.Google Scholar
Mawardi, A. I. 1998. Socio-Political Background of the Enactment of Kompilasi Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. MA thesis, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
McDaniel, J. 2010. Agama Hindu Dharma Indonesia as a New Religious Movement: Hinduism Recreated in the Image of Islam. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions 14, 1: 93111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menski, W. 2003. Hindu Law: Beyond Tradition and Modernity. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Minor, R. N. 1982. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan on the Nature of “Hindu” Tolerance. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 50, 2: 275–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minor, R. N. 1999. The Religious, the Spiritual, and the Secular: Auroville and Secular India. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mitra, S. K. and Fischer, A.. 2002. Sacred Laws and the Secular State: An Analytical Narrative of the Controversy over Personal Laws in India. Indian Review 1, 3: 99130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moog, R. S. 1998. Elite-Court Relations in India: An Unsatisfactory Arrangement. Asian Survey 38, 4: 410–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, N. 1978. Mysticism and Everyday Life in Contemporary Java: Cultural Persistence and Change. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Nehru, J. 1989. Jawaharlal Nehru on Minorities and Secularism. Trivandrum: Institute of Management in Government.Google Scholar
Nurlaelawati, E. 2010. Modernization, Tradition and Identity: The Kompilasi Hukum Islam and Legal Practice in the Indonesian Religious Courts. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.Google Scholar
O'Shaughnessy, K. 2009. Gender, State and Social Power in Contemporary Indonesia: Divorce and Marriage Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pantham, T. 1997. Indian Secularism and Its Critics: Some Reflections. Review of Politics 59, 3: 523–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, N. and Mietzner, M.. 2009. Sharia by-Laws in Indonesia. A Legal and Political Analysis. Australian Journal of Asian Law 11, 12: 190217.Google Scholar
Pausacker, H. 2012. Playboy, the Islamic Defenders’ Front and the Law: Enforcing Islamic Norms in Post-Soeharto Indonesia? Australian Journal of Asian Law 13, 1: 120.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. K. 2005. Was Hinduism Invented? Britons, Indians, and Colonial Construction of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramstedt, M. 2004a. The Hinduization of Local Traditions in South Sulawesi. In Ramstedt, M., ed., Hinduism in Modern Indonesia: A Minority Religion between Local, National, and Global Interests. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 184225.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, M. 2004b. Introduction: Negotiating Identities—Indonesian ‘Hindus’ between Local, National, and Global Interests. In Ramstedt, M., ed., Hinduism in Modern Indonesia: A Minority Religion between Local, National, and Global Interests. New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 134.Google Scholar
Rana, M. S. 2006. India Votes: Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha Elections 2001–2005. New Delhi: Sarup and Sons.Google Scholar
Rao, A. and Rao, B. G.. 1974. Six Thousand Days: Jawaharlal Nehru, Prime Minister. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.Google Scholar
Rao, B. 2004. Religion, Law, and Minorities in India: Problems with Judicial Regulation. In Richardson, J. T., ed., Regulating Religion: Case Studies from around the Globe. New York: Kluwer, 381413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocher, R. 2010. The Creation of Anglo-Hindu Law. In Lubin, T., Davis, D. R., and Krishnan, J., eds., Hinduism and Law: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 7888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachar, R. 2006. Social, Economic and Educational Status of the Muslim Community of India. New Delhi: Prime Minister's High Level Committee.Google Scholar
Salim, A. 2008. Challenging the Secular State: The Islamization of Law in Modern Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sathe, S. P. 2003. Judicial Activism in India. 2d ed.Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, S. A. 2004. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. 2d ed.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, A. 1996. An “Old” Religion in “New Order” Indonesia: Notes on Ethnicity and Religious Affiliation. Sociology of Religion 57, 4: 409–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrauwers, A. 2000. Colonial ‘Reformation’ in the Highlands of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, 1892–1995. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, R. 2010. Articles of Faith: Religion, Secularism, and the Indian Supreme Court. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sezgin, Y. 2013. Human Rights under State-Enforced Religious Family Laws in Israel, Egypt and India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. E. 1963. India as a Secular State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. Z. 1998. Religion, Religions, Religious. In Taylor, M. C., ed., Critical Terms for Religious Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 269–84.Google Scholar
Stump, R. W. 2000. Boundaries of Faith: Geographical Perspectives on Religious Fundamentalism. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Surbakti, R. A. 1991. Interrelation between Religious and Political Power under New Order Indonesia. PhD diss., Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.Google Scholar
Sweet, A. S. 2003. Constitutional Courts and Parliamentary Democracy. In Thatcher, M. and Sweet, A. Stone, eds., The Politics of Delegation. London: Frank Cass, 6989.Google Scholar
Tallberg, J. 2003. Delegation to Supranational Institutions: Why, How, and with What Consequences? In Thatcher, M. and Sweet, A. Stone, eds., The Politics of Delegation. London: Frank Cass, 2346.Google Scholar
Tate, C. N. 1993. Courts and Crisis Regimes: A Theory Sketch with Asian Case Studies. Political Research Quarterly 46, 2: 311–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, C. N. 1995. Why the Expansion of Judicial Power. In Tate, C. N. and Vallinder, T., eds., The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press, 2737.Google Scholar
Thatcher, M. and Sweet, A. S.. 2003. Theory and Practice of Delegation to Non-Majoritarian Institutions. In Thatcher, M. and Sweet, A. Stone, eds., The Politics of Delegation. London: Frank Cass, 122.Google Scholar
Williams, R. V. 2006. Postcolonial Politics and Personal Laws: Colonial Legal Legacies and the Indian State. New Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavos, J. 2002. The Emergence of Hindu Nationalism in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 43
Total number of PDF views: 360 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-tmbpq Total loading time: 0.362 Render date: 2021-01-21T21:11:54.748Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Regulation of “Religion” and the “Religious”: The Politics of Judicialization and Bureaucratization in India and Indonesia
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Regulation of “Religion” and the “Religious”: The Politics of Judicialization and Bureaucratization in India and Indonesia
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Regulation of “Religion” and the “Religious”: The Politics of Judicialization and Bureaucratization in India and Indonesia
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *