Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Randomized Rumour Spreading: The Effect of the Network Topology

  • KONSTANTINOS PANAGIOTOU (a1), XAVIER PÉREZ-GIMÉNEZ (a2), THOMAS SAUERWALD (a3) and HE SUN (a4)

Abstract

We consider the popular and well-studied push model, which is used to spread information in a given network with n vertices. Initially, some vertex owns a rumour and passes it to one of its neighbours, which is chosen randomly. In each of the succeeding rounds, every vertex that knows the rumour informs a random neighbour. It has been shown on various network topologies that this algorithm succeeds in spreading the rumour within O(log n) rounds. However, many studies are quite coarse and involve huge constants that do not allow for a direct comparison between different network topologies. In this paper, we analyse the push model on several important families of graphs, and obtain tight runtime estimates. We first show that, for any almost-regular graph on n vertices with small spectral expansion, rumour spreading completes after log2n + log n+o(log n) rounds with high probability. This is the first result that exhibits a general graph class for which rumour spreading is essentially as fast as on complete graphs. Moreover, for the random graph G(n,p) with p=c log n/n, where c > 1, we determine the runtime of rumour spreading to be log2n + γ (c)log n with high probability, where γ(c) = clog(c/(c−1)). In particular, this shows that the assumption of almost regularity in our first result is necessary. Finally, for a hypercube on n=2d vertices, the runtime is with high probability at least (1+β) ⋅ (log2n + log n), where β > 0. This reveals that the push model on hypercubes is slower than on complete graphs, and thus shows that the assumption of small spectral expansion in our first result is also necessary. In addition, our results combined with the upper bound of O(log n) for the hypercube (see [11]) imply that the push model is faster on hypercubes than on a random graph G(n, clog n/n), where c is sufficiently close to 1.

Copyright

References

Hide All
[1]Alon, N. and Chung, F. R. K. (1988) Explicit construction of linear sized tolerant networks. Discrete Math. 72 1519.
[2]Alon, N. and Spencer, J. (2008) The Probabilistic Method, third edition, Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization, Wiley.
[3]Boyd, S., Ghosh, A., Prabhakar, B. and Shah, D. (2006) Randomized gossip algorithms. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52 25082530.
[4]Broder, A. Z., Frieze, A. M., Suen, S. and Upfal, E. (1998) Optimal construction of edge-disjoint paths in random graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 28 541573.
[5]Chierichetti, F., Lattanzi, S. and Panconesi, A. (2010) Almost tight bounds for rumour spreading with conductance. In 42nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing: STOC'10, pp. 399–408.
[6]Cooper, C. and Frieze, A. M. (2007) The cover time of sparse random graphs. Random Struct. Alg. 30 116.
[7]Doerr, B., Friedrich, T. and Sauerwald, T. (2008) Quasirandom rumor spreading. In 19th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms: SODA'08, pp. 773–781. arXiv.1012.5351
[8]Dubhashi, D. and Panconesi, A. (2009) Concentration of Measure for the Analysis of Randomized Algorithms, Cambridge University Press.
[9]Elsässer, R. and Sauerwald, T. (2009) On the runtime and robustness of randomized broadcasting. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 410 34143427.
[10]Elsässer, R. and Sauerwald, T. (2009) Cover time and broadcast time. In 26th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science: STACS'09, pp. 373–384.
[11]Feige, U., Peleg, D., Raghavan, P. and Upfal, E. (1990) Randomized broadcast in networks. Random Struct. Alg. 1 447460.
[12]Fountoulakis, N. and Panagiotou, K. (2010) Rumor spreading on random regular graphs and expanders. In 14th International Workshop on Randomization and Computation: RANDOM'10, pp. 560–573.
[13]Fountoulakis, N., Huber, A. and Panagiotou, K. (2010) Reliable broadcasting in random networks and the effect of density. In 29th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications: INFOCOM'10, pp. 2552–2560.
[14]Friedrich, T., Gairing, M. and Sauerwald, T. (2012) Quasirandom load balancing. SIAM J. Comput. 41 747771.
[15]Frieze, A. and Grimmett, G. (1985) The shortest-path problem for graphs with random arc-lengths. Discrete Appl. Math. 10 5777.
[16]Füredi, Z. and Kómlos, J. (1981) The eigenvalues of random symmetric matrices. Combinatorica 3 233241.
[17]Giakkoupis, G. (2011) Tight upper bounds for rumor spreading in graphs of a given conductance. In 28th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science: STACS'11, pp. 57–68.
[18]Giakkoupis, G. and Sauerwald, T. (2012) Rumor spreading and vertex expansion. In 23rd Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms: SODA'12,, pp. 1623–1641.
[19]Hoory, S., Linial, N. and Wigderson, A. (2006) Expander graphs and their applications. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 43 439561.
[20]Janson, S., Łuczak, T. and Ruciński, A. (2000) Random Graphs, Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization, Wiley.
[21]Karp, R., Schindelhauer, C., Shenker, S. and Vöcking, B. (2000) Randomized rumor spreading. In 41st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science: FOCS'00, pp. 565–574.
[22]Krivelevich, M. and Sudakov, B. (2006) Pseudo-random graphs. In More Sets, Graphs and Numbers, Vol. 15 of Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies, Springer, pp. 199262.
[23]McDiarmid, C. (1989) On the method of bounded differences. In Surveys in Combinatorics, Vol. 141 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, Cambridge University Press, pp. 148188.
[24]Meyer, C. D. (2000) Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, SIAM. http://www.matrixanalysis.com/DownloadChapters.html
[25]Mitzenmacher, M. and Upfal, E. (2005) Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis, Cambridge University Press.
[26]Mosk-Aoyama, D. and Shah, D. (2008) Fast distributed algorithms for computing separable functions. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 54 29973007.
[27]Vu, V. H. (2007) Spectral norm of random matrices. Combinatorica 27 721736.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Randomized Rumour Spreading: The Effect of the Network Topology

  • KONSTANTINOS PANAGIOTOU (a1), XAVIER PÉREZ-GIMÉNEZ (a2), THOMAS SAUERWALD (a3) and HE SUN (a4)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.