Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-9klrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T21:13:14.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Proposed Restoration, with a New Interpretation, of Aeschylus, Prometheus, 790–792

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. E. Harry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 24 , Issue 6 , September 1910 , pp. 174 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1910

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 174 note 1 In his review of my Problems in Prometheus in Berliner Phil. Wochenschrift, 29, 1268.

page 175 note 1 The phrase may be used even if the direction is north-east: (Hdt. 7, 58).

page 175 note 2 Even the map of Ptolemy, nearly seven centuries later, connected Africa and Asia by land south of Aethiopia; and it is very probable that Aeschylus conceived the Nile as rising far to the east in Asia. Thus Io would arrive at the source by crossing the Caspian. Even Marco Polo's narrative was utterly opposed to what the geographers of his time believed.