Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T20:33:14.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Poste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

O. Skutsch
Affiliation:
University of Manchester.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 105 note 1 Amph. 1035 (a word has dropped out); Rud. 1105 (read sur[ru]pta); Stick. 699 (read provincial, with quasi-diaeresis); True. 810 (read pol pertinet); 897 (read si[e]s. (ec)quid). One or two examples are found in a canticum (Pseud. 140?; Rud. 283?), and, finally, in Capt. 285 and 633 the monstrous name Thensaurocrysonicochrysides makes diaeresis impossible.

page 106 note 2 Having harboured it for many years, I will not entirely suppress the suspicion that, like the e fo poste, the original final e of huce, etc., might create a quasi-caesura or quasi-diaeresis in at least some of them. As far as the senarii are inter might well belong to a category different from ad and apud. Of the septenarii Cist. 669 would fall in, and extra and praeter would line up the inter. but Mil. 995 and Trin. 333 (less decidedly Cist. 87) seem to bar this way.