Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-55tpx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-13T21:02:01.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hem, Em, and Ehem - G. Luck: Über einige Interjektionen der lateinischen Umgangssprache. Pp. 88. Heidelberg: Winter, 1964. Paper, DM. 16.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

John G. Griffith
Affiliation:
Jesus College, Oxford

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 304 note 1 Especially in regard to sim at end of 712 the rule for final monosyllables (Lindsay, E.L.V., p. 340) holds for Terence.

page 304 note 2 If ainsi could be certified as derived from em sic (pp. 48, 58, 83) a case for ‘submerged’ persistence might be made out.

page 304 note 3 I owe this information to Mr. C. T. d'Alessandro, a gifted and sensitive linguist, whose mother tongue is Italian. He tells me that a nasalized uhm? occurs occasionally, but serves more as a non-committal stopgap.

page 305 note 1 Luck puts one example of hem … perii (Pers. 741) in his Group 5 (p. 26), the rest where they belong in Group 6.