Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T19:24:25.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ei of εἰ δ' ἄγε

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1895

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For apparent repetitions of the same element where really the element has become differentiated in one of its uses, cp. λλ in the same sentence as ῔λλοι, and igitur in the same sentence as agitur, &c.: on the other hand, there are many repetitions where one element may really reinforce and repeat the other—thus cp. possibly the Homeric μν κεν, as opposed to be δ κεν or δ῔ν, &c. The two classes cannot be always distinguished, e.g. in a use like εἴ περ γρ τε…κα…λλ τε κα (Il. 1, 81) it is dangerous to decide absolutely how far each τε and κα still retains its early force.

2 There is no need to call this use always Jussive or Optative in origin : both Moods (Subj. and Opt.) as well as the Fut. Ind. are capable of a neutral use which may be called Concessive. On the other hand there is no need to altogether exclude the ‘Hortative’ and ‘Wishing’ use as origins.