Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T12:15:19.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Birth of the Free Church Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

James Fulton Maclear
James Fulton Maclear
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota—Duluth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The free church form which much of British and American Protestantism has assumed stems primarily from the shaping of Nonconformity in seventeenth-century England. Yet the uniqueness and significance of this origin have not always been appreciated. These English and American churches have a basis distinct from that of the free churches which arose on the Continent in the nineteenth century. For unlike the latter, the free churches of Nonconformity developed within the fabric of Christian state and society and not out of any fundamental ideological conflict with secularized authority. Again, in England and America the free church form was molded in the unique environment of religious multiplicity which Puritan divisions produced. Consequently, it was as difficult for any religious group to respond to this environment in the classical sectarian pattern as for churchly institutions to maintain pretensions to uniformity—a fact which even church historians, impressed by Troeltsch's church-sect dichotomy, have been slow to recognize. And lastly, in both England and America the free church would seem to have been shaped by certain axioms of Puritan thought and piety. Indeed, this essay seeks to show that Puritanism both produced the problem and suggested the alternatives out of which the final free church concepts emerged.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 1957 , pp. 99 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Note: Research for this essay was aided by a grant from the university of Minnesota Graduate School.

Charles Gore, cited in Johnson, Humphrey J. T., Anglicanism in Transition (London, 1938), p. 195.Google Scholar There is a small and inadequate literature on denominationalism in America. The only satisfactory account of the concept in England is Hudson, Winthrop S., “Denominationalism as a basis for ecumenicity: a seventeenth century conception,” Church History, Vol. XXIV, No. 1 (03, 1955), pp. 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Pearson, A. F. Scott, Church and state (Cambridge, 1928), especially pp. 9–40, 106.Google Scholar

3. Miller, Perry, Orthodoxy in Massachusetts (Cambridge, 1933) p. 265,Google Scholar quoting Shepard, Thomas and Allin, John, A defence of the answer (London, 1648), p. 16.Google Scholar

4. Pearson, p. 116. Troeltsch, Ernst, Social Teachings of the Christian Churches (London, 1931), II, 656 ff.Google Scholar

5. Knappen, M. M., Tudor Puritanism (Chicago, 1939), pp. 253–255Google Scholar; Baxter, Richard, Reliquiae Baxterianae (London, 1696)Google Scholar, Part I, p. 83. The group to which Lilburne attached himself is described in Kiffin, William, Remarkable passages in the life of William Kiffin (1823), p. 10.Google Scholar

6. This inner conflict is lucidly displayed in Burton, Henry, The protestation protested (1641), especially pp. 11–20.Google Scholar

7. Pearson, pp. 9–10, 15, 23.

8. Marshall, Stephen, A sermon preached before the honourable house of commons now assembled in parliament, at their publike fast, November 17, 1640 (London, 1641), p. 40;Google ScholarHobbes, Thomas, Behemoth (1680), p. 28.Google Scholar

9. An apologeticall narration (London, 1643), p. 15Google Scholar; Dexter, Henry Martyn, Congregationalism of the last three hundred years (New York, 1880), p. 651Google Scholar, quoting Baxter, Richard, True history of councils, p. 90.Google Scholar

10. Walker, Williston, Creeds and platforms of Congregationalism (New York, 1893), p. 78;Google ScholarBusher, Leonard, Religions peace (1646), p. 56.Google Scholar

11. Burrage, Champlin, The church covenant idea (Philadelphia, 1904), pp. 46–47.Google Scholar

12. Whitley, William T. (ed.) The works of John Smyth (Cambridge, 1915), II, 755–756.Google Scholar For early Baptist history, see Whitley, W. P., A history of British Baptists (London, 1923)Google Scholar and Underwood, A. C., A history of English Baptists (London, 1947).Google Scholar

13. Works of John Smyth, I, 267.Google Scholar

14. Ibid., I, 166.

15. Walker, p. 71; Knappen, p. 307.

16. Jordan, W. K., The development of religious toleration in England (London, 1932–1940)Google Scholar; Lyon, P., Theory of religious liberty in England 1603–39 (Cambridge, 1937).Google Scholar

17. Lyon, p. 122. Italics mine.

18. Works of John Smyth, II, 748Google Scholar; Lyon, pp. 119–133.

19. Lyon, p. 113.

20. John, Bruce (ed.), Notes of the tceaty carried on at Ripon (“Camden Society Publications,” C [Westminster, 1859]), p. 77.Google Scholar

21. There is almost nothing on Episcopal Puritanism. On Congregationalism the standard histories, Dexter's volume mentioned above and Dale, R. W., History of English Congregationalism (London, 1907)Google Scholar, are still useful. On the trend toward Presbyterianism, see the suggestive article by Hudson, Winthrop, “The Scottish effort to Presbyterianize the Church of England during the early months of the Long Parliament,” Church History, VIII (1939), 255–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22. David, Laing (ed.) The letters and journals of Robert Baillie (Edinburgh, 1841), II, 195.Google Scholar

23. Reliquiac Baxterianae, Part II, p. 150; Bosher, Robert S., The making of the Restoration settlement (Westminster, 1951), p. 35.Google Scholar

24. Bosher, p. 39.

25. Rushworth, John, Historical collections (1721–1722), IV, 174Google Scholar; Overton, Richard, The arraignment of Mr. Persecution (London, 1645).Google Scholar

26. Edwards, Thomas, Reasons against the Independent government (1641)Google Scholar “Epistle dedicatory,” unpaged.

27. Jordan. III, 322–323.

28. Ibid., pp. 316–346.

29. Apologeticall Narration, p. 15 ff.

30. Nuttall, Geoffrey F., The Holy Spirit in Puritan faith and experience (Oxford, 1947).Google Scholar For an account of this same tension in American Congregationalism, see my “‘The heart of New England rent’: The mystical element in early Puritan history,” Mississippi Valley Historical Review, Vol. XLII, No. 4, (03, 1956). pp. 621–652.Google Scholar

31. Works of John Robinson (Boston, 1851), I, xlivGoogle Scholar; Burrage, p. 79; Apologeticall Narration, pp. 10–11.

32. Cook, John, What the Independents would have (1647).Google Scholar [Owen], John, The Works of John Owen (ed. Goold, William H.) (London, 1851), VIII, 401–426Google Scholar for an example. For a typical utterance (to the Little Parliament), see Abbott, Wilbur Cortoz (ed.), The writings and speeches of Oliver Cromwell (Cambridge, 1937–1945), III, 62:Google Scholar “Have a care of the whole flock! Love the sheep, love the lambs… And if the poorest Christian, the most mistaken Christian shall desire but to lead a life of godliness and honesty, let him be protected.” Nuttall, p. 97.

33. Burroughes, Jeremiah, Irenicum to the lovers of truth and peace (London, 1646), p. 26.Google Scholar

34. Woodhousc, A. S. P. (ed.) Puritanism and liberty (Chicago, 1951), pp. 143, 153–154;Google ScholarOwen, , Works, VIII, 386Google Scholar; Walker, pp. 393–394. A good statement of Owen's conservatism is found in Owen, John, Unto the questions sent me last night (London, 1659).Google Scholar

35. The Ancient bounds, or liberty of conscience (London, 1645), pp. 10–11.Google Scholar

36. Osmund, Airy (ed.), Burnet's history of my own time (Oxford, 1897), I, 114.Google Scholar

37. Abbott, III, 459.

38. Carl, Stephenson and Marcham, Frederick George (eds.), Sources of English constitutiorul history (New York, 1937), p. 528.Google Scholar

39. Stoughton, John, History of Religion in England (New York. 1882), II, 89.Google Scholar

40. Dale, pp. 320 ff.

41. Quoted in Bosher, pp. 7–8.

42. Abbott, III, 834. Compare the decision of a Congregational council in London 1659: “Though we greatly prize our christian liberties, yet we profess our utter dislike and abhorrence of a Universal Toleration.” Browne, John, History of Congregationalism and memorials of the churches in Norfolk and Suffolk (London, 1877), p. 225.Google Scholar

43. Underwood, pp. 80–81; Reliquiae Baxterianae, Part I, p. 72.

44. Stoughton, II, 228, 200–204. Some Congregational clergymen gathered churches out of the parishes which they served as ministers of the Establishment.

45. Rogers, E. (ed.), Some account of the life and opinions of a Fifth-Monarchy man (London, 1867), p. 214.Google Scholar

46. Abbott, IV, 495–496. See Ibid., III, 459 for another characteristic expression in 1654: “Is not Liberty of Conscience in religion a fundamental! So long as there is liberty of conscience for the supreme magistrate to exercise hi conscience in erecting what form of church-government he is satisfied he should set up, why should not he give it to others! Liberty of conscience is a natural right; and he that would have it ought to give it, having liberty to settle what he likes for the public.”

47. See Nuttall, passim, but especially pp. 96–97, 113 ff. Underhill, E. B., Confessions of faith (London, 1854), p. 59.Google Scholar

48. Rogers, p. 215; A declaration of the army of England upon their march into Scotland (1650), pp. 9–10.Google Scholar

49. Brown, Louise Fargo, The political activitites of the Baptists and Fifth- Monarchy Men (Washington, 1912), pp. 137–139.Google Scholar

50. See the discussion in Whitley, pp. 70–71, and Underwood, pp. 80–81.

51. On Tombs, see Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, 1917), Vol. XIX.Google ScholarVedder, H. C., A short history of the Baptists (Philadelphia, 1907), p. 61,Google Scholar quoting A declaration of several of the people called Anabaptists in and about the city of London (1659): “Whereas we are further charged with endeavoring an universal toleration of all miscarriage, both in things religious and civil, under pretence of liberty of conscience it is, in both respects, notoriously false … Nor do we desire in matters of religion, that Popery should be tolerated… nor any persons tolerated that worship a false god; nor any that speak contemptuously and reproach. fully of our Lord Jesus Christ; nor any that deny the Holy Scriptures… to be the word of God. And yet we are not against tolerating of Episcopacy, Presbyters, or any stinted form, provided they do not compel others to a compliance therewith.”

52. Rogers, p. 127; Underwood, pp. 80–81.

53. Reliquiae Baxterianae, Part I, p. 53.

54. Schenk, Wilhelm, The concern for social justice in the Puritan Revolution (London, 1948)Google Scholar, throughout, but especially pp. 132–141.

55. A declaration of several of the churches of Christ (London, 1654), p. 56.Google Scholar

56. Woodhouse, p. 245.

57. Underhill, pp. 333–334, Rogers, pp. 51, 54–55, 67, 205, 206.

58. Woodhouse, “Introduction,” Puritanism and liberty.

59. Woodhouse, p. 161.

60. Goodwin, John, Thirty queries (London, 1653), p. 3.Google Scholar For use of Acts 18:14, see Sions groans for her distressed (1661) in Tracts on liberty of conscience (London, 1846), p. 360.Google Scholar

61. Underhill, pp. 324–325. Note also Ibid., p. 329: “Though the saints, as such, are not to expect an interest and share in the government of the world, until the good day aforesaid [that day in which the Lord Jesus shall visibly descend from heaven in power and great glory] yet in the capacity of honest and faithful men, they ought, when called thereunto, to yield their best assistance in and about the management of the civil government and kingdoms or commonweals.”

62. Schenk, pp. 74. 139.

63. Abbott, III, 64.

64. Richardson, Samuel, Plain dealing (London, 1656), p. 5.Google Scholar

65. Maclear, J. F., “Quakerism and the end of the Interregnum; a chapter in the domestication of radical Puritanism,” Church History, Vol. XIX, No. 4 (12, 1950).Google Scholar

66. Brauer, J. C., “Puritan mysticism and the development of liberalism,” Church History, Vol. XIX, No. 3 (09, 1950).Google Scholar

67. Bosher, pp. 57–58.

68. Jones, I. Deane, The English Revolution (London, 1931), p. 125.Google Scholar

69. Quoted in Drysdale, A. H., A History of the Presbyterians in England (London, 1889), pp. 420–422.Google Scholar

70. An early instance of the mingling of the two concepts can be seen in Baxter's statement, quoted Jordan, III, 173. “I think that land most happy whose rulers use their authority for Christ, as well as for the civil peace; yet in comparison of the rest of the world, I shall think that land that hath but bare liberty to be as good as they are willing to be; and if countenance and maintenance be but added to liberty, and tollerated errors and sects be but forced to keep the peace … I shall not hereafter much fear such toleration nor despair that truth will bear down adversaries.”

71. Clark, H. W., History of English Nonconformity from Wiclif to the close of the nineteenth century (London, 1911–1913), II, 414–415.Google Scholar

72. I expect to publish an essay on this subject, “‘The true American union’ of church and state” in the near future.