Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T11:46:23.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anti-Intellectualism in the puritan Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Leo F. Solt
Leo F. Solt
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The preachers of the New Model Army during the 1640's and 1650's engaged in a three-pronged attack upon the educated people of Puritan England, i.e., upon the clergy, the university teachers, and the lawyers. Both the Levellers and the Diggers gave strong support to this anti-professional or anti-intellectual point of view. Most of the Army preachers, especially William Dell, John Saltmarsh, Thomas Collier, Walter Cradock, and William Erbery, were purveyors of that branch of Independent Puritanism (sometimes called Antinomianism) which stressed the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit rather than formal learning. Furthermore, despite the conclusions of R. H. Tawney about Puritanism in general, the Army preachers were generally concerned with the poor and uneducated members of society rather than the prosperous and educated. In the phraseology of H. Richard Niebuhr, they sought “the salvation of the socially disinherited.” An examination of this interest in social amelioration will help to clarify the anti-intellectual attack.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 1956 , pp. 306 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tawney declared that “the chosen seat of the Puritan spirit seemed to be those classes in society which combined economic independence, education and a certain decent pride in their status.” Religion and the Rise of Capitalism (Mentor Books edition; New York, 1947), pp. 168, 199–200.Google Scholar

2. Niebuhr, H. Richard, The Social Sources of Denominationalism (Hamden, Connecticut, 1954), p. 30.Google Scholar

3. Bolt, Leo F., “John Saltmarsh: New Model Army Chaplain,” The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, II (04, 1951), pp. 69–80.Google Scholar

4. The Practical Works of Richard Baxter (London, 1847), I, 211Google Scholar, quoted in Hudson, Winthrop S., “Puritanism and the Spirit of Capitalism,” Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture, XVIII (03, 1949), p. 13.Google Scholar

5. “Men that have Estates in Money or Land, depend on these things for their maintenance, but a Christian may have little or nothing of these in the world, but he hath a promise, which is a thousand times better, and makes his life more comfortable.” Dell, William, The Building, Beauty, Teaching, and Establishment of the Truly Christian Church (London, 1651), pp. 87, 91Google Scholar, contained in Several Sermons and Discourses of William Dell, reprinted in 1709. Building, Beauty was first published in 1646 under the title The Building and Glory of the Christian Church. Dell, , Christ's Spirit a Christian's Strength (London, 1651), p. 22Google Scholar, contained in Several Sermons and Discourses of William Dell, reprinted in 1709. Christ's Spirit was first published in 1645 under the title of Power from on High; or, the Powr of thc Holy Ghost.

6. Cradoek, Walter, The Saints Fulnesse of Joy in Their Fellowship with God (London, 1646), p. 32Google Scholar.

7. Petegorsky, David W., Left-Wing Democracy in the English Civil War (London, 1940), pp. 64–65;Google Scholar Niebuhr called denominationalism the “accommodation of religion to the caste system.” The Social Sources of Denominationalism, p. 25.

8. George, Charles H., “A Social Interpretation of English Puritanism,” Journal of Modern History, XXV (12, 1953), p. 341.Google Scholar George concluded that the “frightening independency” of the Army was a religion of the poor (which in many respects is true) and a religion of the damned (which is quite incorrect).

9. Peters, Hugh, God's Doings, and Man's Duty (Second edition; London, 1645), p. 41.Google Scholar

10. Dell, William, Right Reformation, or the Reformation of the Church of the New- Testament (London, 1651), p. 158Google Scholar, contained in Several Sermons and Discourses of William Dell, reprinted in 1709; Dell, , Building, Beauty, p. 87Google Scholar. Dell's warning seemed to carry an implied threat, for what better way was there for God to act, in relieving the suffering of the poor, than through His Saints, who, as co-inheritors of the Holy Spirit, acted with the power of God?

11. Clark, G. N., The Wealth of England from 1496 to 1760 (London, 1946), p. 117.Google Scholar

12. Dietz, Frederick C., An Economic History of England (New York, 1942), pp. 184–85.Google Scholar

13. Peters, Hugh, Mr. Peter's Last Report of the English Wars (London, 1646), p. 9.Google Scholar However, Peters felt merchants should be encouraged with a Law of Merchants.

14. Schenk, Wilhelm, The Concern for Social Justice in the Puritan Revolution (London, 1948), p. 98.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., pp. 100–102; Sabinc, George H., ed., The Works of Gerrard Winstanley (Ithaca, New York, 1941), pp. 423, 82.Google Scholar

16. Sabine, , Winstanley, p. 509.Google Scholar

17. Dell, , Building, Beauty, p. 91.Google Scholar

18. Woodhouse, A. S. P., Puritanism and Liberty. Being the Army Debates (1647- 9) from the Clarke Manuscripts with Supplementary Documents (Second edition; Chicago, 1951), p. 57.Google Scholar

19. Ogg, David, “English Puritanism and Its Importance in Schemes of Legal and Social Reform,” a lecture delivered on 10 July 1951 at the Oxford Arts Festival, Oxford, Engiand.Google Scholar

20. Baillie, Robert, Anabaptism, the True Fountaine (London, 1647)Google Scholar, Preface. John Bastwick wrote that many of the “Independent itinerary preachers run from place to place, preaching against the Nobility and Gentry, against the Reverend Assembly, against the Directory, against Tythes, against the Presbytery; yea against all that is called authority.” Bastwick, , The Utter Routing of the Whole Army of All the Independents and Sectaries (London, 1646)Google Scholar, “The Epistle to the Reader.”

21. Petegorsky, , Left-Wing Democracy, p. 65.Google Scholar

22. Firth, Charles H., Cromwell's Army (London, 1902), p. 40.Google Scholar

23. D. B. Robertson has discussed at some length not only the anti-intellectual views of John Lilburne but also those of John Spencer and Samuel How, both “mechanick” preachers. The Religious Foundations of Leveller Democracy (New York, 1951), pp. 33–37Google Scholar. The following title of a pamphlet by How is suggestive: The Sufficiencie of the Spirits Teaching Without Human Learning: or, a Treatise Tending to Prove Humane Learning to be no Help to the Spiritual Understanding of the Word of God.

24. Dell, William, The Tryal of Spirits, both in Teachers and Hearers (London, 1666), pp. 554, 635Google Scholar, contained in Several Sermons and Discourses of William Dell, reprinted in 1709. Furthermore, wrote Dell, the universities have kept the same “forms and follies,” such as hoods, caps, scarlet robes, doctoral ring and dinner, kissing gloves, and music. In Tudor times as well as during the ascendancy of Archbishop Laud, some of these forms had been objects of abuse by the Puritans.

25. Webster, John, Academiarum Examen, or the Examination of Academies (London, 1654), pp. 4, 9–11Google Scholar. Webster, deploring Aristotle's influence, especially political, in the universities, wrote: “yea even our own Countreyman master Hobbs hath pieces of more exquisiteness, and profundity in that subject, thais ever the Graecian wit was able to reach unto or attain.” Academiarum Examen, p. 88. However, Webster was attacked by Seth Ward for being a well-known Leveller. Vindiciae Academiarum (Oxford, 1654), pp. 42–43Google Scholar. Indeed, Webster claimed, in the terminology of John Lilburne, to be a “freeborn Englishman.”“I must needs so far own Levelling,” he wrote, “that I hold plain dealing to be a jewel.” Academiarum Examen, “Epistle to the Reader.”

26. Webster, , Academiarum Exainen, pp. 6–7.Google Scholar

27. Dell, , The Tryal of Spirits, p. 529.Google Scholar

28. Dell, , Christ's Spirit, p. 22.Google Scholar

29. Saltmarsh, John, An End of One Controversie, contained in Some Drops of the Vial (London, 1646), p. 115Google Scholar; Wood-house, , Puritanism and Liberty, p. 182.Google Scholar

30. Robertson, , The Religious Foundations of Leveller Democracy, p. 39.Google Scholar

31. Sabine, , Winstanley, p. 238.Google Scholar

32. [Cheynell, Francis], An Account Given to the Parliament by the Ministers Sent by Them to Oxford (London, 1647), p. 38.Google Scholar

33. Walwyn, William, The Power of Love (London, 1643), p. 44.Google Scholar

34. Dell, , The Tryal of Spirits, pp. 585, 589.Google Scholar

35. Schlatter, Richard, “The Higher Learning in Puritan England,” Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church, XXIII (06, 1954), p. 172Google Scholar; Miller, Perry, The New Engloind Mind: the Seventeenth Century (New York, 1939), p. 78.Google Scholar

36. Solt, Leo F., “William Dell: New Model Army Chaplain,” The Church Quarterly Review, CLV (01-03, 1954), p. 49.Google Scholar

37. Dell, , The Tryal of Spirits, pp. 645–48.Google Scholar This secularization of university studies can also be found in Winstanley's The Law of Freedom. See Sabine, , Winstanley, p. 67.Google Scholar

38. Baxter, Richard, Reliquiae Baxterianae (London, 1696), p. 64.Google Scholar

39. Wright, Louis B., Middle-Class Culture in Elizabethan England (Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1935), pp. 73–75.Google Scholar

40. Peters thought that Bacon's The Advancement of Learning had propounded many excellent and “learned Problemes, experiments, and speculations.” Good Work for a Good Magistrate (London, 1651), pp. 74–75.Google Scholar

41. Peters, Hugh, A Word for the Armie. And Two Words to the Kingdome (London, 1647), p. 11.Google Scholar

42. Vincent, W. A. L., The State and School Education- 1640–1660 in England and Wales (London, 1950), p. 88.Google Scholar

43. Stearns, Raymond P., The Strenuous Puritan, Hugh Peters, 1598–1660 (Urbana, Illinois, 1954), p. 140.Google Scholar

44. Every Mans Right: or Englands Perspective-Glasse (n.p., 1646), pp. 5–6.Google Scholar

45. Collier, Thomas, A Discovery of the New Creation. In a Sermon Preached at the Head-Quarters at Putney Sept. 9, 1647 (London, 1647), p. 35.Google Scholar

46. Ogg, Oxford Arts Festival lecture, 10 July 1951.

47. Schenk, , The Concern for Social Justice, p. 67Google Scholar; Peters, , A Word for the Armie, p. 13.Google Scholar

48. Smith, Goldwin, “The Reform of the Laws of England, 1640–1660,” The University of Toronto Quarterly, X (07, 1941), pp. 476–77.Google Scholar

49. Overton, Richard, An Appeale (London, 1647)Google Scholar, reprinted in Wolfe, Don M., ed., Leveller Manifestoes of the Puritan Revolution (New York, 1944), p. 193.Google Scholar

50. “That all Lawes of the Land (lockt up from common capacities in the Latine or French tongues,) may bee translated into the English tongue.” Ibid., p. 192.

51. Collier, , A Discovery of the New Creation, p. 35.Google Scholar

52. Mereurius Populi, [November 11, 1647], p. 5, quoted in Schenk, , The Concern for Social Justice, p. 67.Google Scholar

53. Peters, , A Word for the Armie, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar

54. Massey, Robert, The Examination and Correctwn of a Paper Lately Printed Intituled a Relation of the Discourse Between Mr. Hugh Peters and Leiut. Collonel John Lilborn in the Tower of London (London, 1649)Google Scholar.

55. Smith, , The University of Toronto Quarterly, X, 474.Google Scholar

56. Peters, Hugh, Good Work for a Good Magistrate (London, 1651), pp. 32–33Google Scholar; Sabine, , Winstanley, p. 509.Google Scholar

57. Whitelock, Bulstrode, Memorials of the English Affairs (New edition; Oxford, 1853), III, 388.Google Scholar

58. Sabine, , Winstanley, p. 238.Google Scholar

59. James, Margaret, “Political Importance of the Tithes Controversy,” History, XXVII (06, 1941), pp. 9–11.Google Scholar

60. Collier, , A Discovery of the New Creation, pp. 36–37Google Scholar; Collier, Thomas, A Brief Discovery of the Corruption of the Ministrie of the Church of England (London, n. d.), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar

61. Saltmarsh, , An End of One Controversie, p. 115Google Scholar; Saltmarsh, John, Smoke in the Temple, p. 36Google Scholar, contained in Some Drops of the Viall (London, 1646).Google Scholar

62. (1653).

63. Matthews, A. G., ed., Calamy Revised (Oxford, 1934)Google Scholar, s. V.; Mercurius Elencticus, October 29-November 5, 1647, p. 4.

64. Dell, William, The Stumbling-Stone (London, 1653), p. 378.Google Scholar