Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Heavy Hand of the Law: The Canadian Supreme Court and Mandatory Retirement*

  • Thomas R. Klassen (a1) and C. T. Gillin (a2)


In the past two decades the Supreme Court of Canada made apparently contradictory rulings on mandatory retirement. In 1982, the Court ruled that mandatory retirement for firefighters at age 60 violated provincial human rights laws; in 1990, it found that forced retirement for university faculty and others at age 65 was constitutional. An analysis of the decisions shows that the Court relied on the stereotype of older workers as being less competent than younger workers, and failed to provide older workers with protection against age-based discrimination. A number of the key mandatory retirement cases deal with university faculty and may yet have unanticipated consequences, such as strengthening the role of academic tenure. The unwillingness of the Supreme Court to eliminate mandatory retirement means that ad hoc arrangements driven by changing life cycles, employer needs, demographic changes and legislative actions will continue to arise.

Au cours des deux dernières décennies, la Cour suprême du Canada a rendu des jugements en apparence contradictoires sur la retraite obligatoire. En 1982, la Cour a statué que la retraite obligatoire à 60 ans pour les pompiers violait les lois provinciales sur les droits de la personne; en 1990, elle statuait que la retraite obligatoire à 65 ans pour les professeurs et autres membres du personnel des universités était constitutionnelle. L'analyse de ces décisions montre que la Cour s'est appuyée sur le stéréotype voulant que les travailleurs âgés soient moins compétents que les jeunes et n'a pas accordé aux travailleurs âgés une protection contre la discrimination fondée sur l'âge. Un certain nombre des principaux arrêts en matière de retraite obligatoire portent sur le cas de professeurs d'université et pourraient avoir des conséquences imprévues, comme le renforcement du rôle de la titularisation. La réticence de la Cour suprême à abolir la retraite obligatoire signifie la poursuite d'arrangements ad hoc fondés sur l'évolution des cycles de vie, les besoins des employeurs, les changements démographiques et l'évolution de la législation.



Hide All
Able, R.L. (1988). Comparative sociology of the legal professions. In Abel, R.L. and Lewis, P.S.C. (Eds.), Lawyers in society: Volume III, Comparative theories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Adams, G.W. (1992). Mandatory retirement and constitutional choices. Kingston: Queen's University, Industrial Relations Centre, Current Issues Series.
Atchley, R. (1976). The sociology of retirement. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Baltes, P.B., & Baltes, M.M. (1990). Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Banting, K.G., & Boadway, R. (1997). Reform of retirement income policy: International and Canadian perspectives. Kingston: Queen's University School of Policy Studies.
Belanger, A., & Dumas, J. (1998). Report on the demographic situation in Canada 1997. Cat. No. 91–209-XPE.
Bogart, W.A. (1994). Courts and country: The limits of litigation and the social and political life of Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Bur, D.F., & Kehoe, J.K. (1992). Developments in constitutional law: The 1990–91 term. The Supreme Court Law Review [Canada], 3, 403513.
Chotalia, S.P. (1993). The Supreme Court and mandatory retirement: Sanctioning the status quo. Constitutional Forum, 4(3), 6770.
Coyne, A. (1996). The case for blowing up our ivory towers. The Globe and Mail, May 4, 1996, pp. D1, D5.
Croll, D.A. (Chairman). (1979). Retirement without tears. A report of the Special Committee on Retirement Age Policies. Hull, PQ: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
Crystal, S. (1988). Work and retirement in the twenty-first century. Generations 12(3), 6064.
Cumming, E., & Henry, W.E. (1961). Growing old: The process of disengagement. New York: Basic Books.
Denton, F.T. & Spencer, B.G. (1990). Population aging and the economy: Some issues in resource allocation. In Thornton, J.E. and Winkler, E.R. (Eds.), Ethics and aging: The right to live, the right to die (pp. 98123). Vancouver: The University of British Columbia Press.
Dunlop, D.P. (1979). Mandatory retirement policy: A human rights dilemma? Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada.
Finkelstein, N., & Howard, G. (1988). Retirement as a case study. The Advocates' Quarterly, 9(2), 142159.
Fiss, O.M. (1984). Against settlement. Yale Law Journal, 93, 10731090.
Galanter, M. (1974). Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review, 9, 96160.
Gillin, C.T., & Klassen, T.R. (1995). Age discrimination and early retirement policies: A comparison of labor market regulation in Canada and the United States. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 7(1), 85102.
Gower, D. (1997). Retirement age and statistical estimation. In Perspectives on labour and income, 9, 1320, Catalogue no. 75–001–XPE.
Graebner, W. (1980). A history of retirement. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Guillemard, A.-M. (1997). Re-writing social policy and changes within the life course organization. A European perspective. Canadian Journal on Aging, 16(3), 441464.
Gunderson, M. (1998). Flexible retirement as an alternative to 65 and out. CD. Howe Institute Commentary, The Pension Papers, No. 106. Toronto: CD. Howe Institute.
Gunderson, M., & Pesando, J. (1988). The case for allowing mandatory retirement. Canadian Public Policy — Analyse de Politiques, 14(1), 3239.
Guppy, N. (1989). The magic of 65: Issues and evidence in the mandatory retirement debate. Canadian Journal on Aging, 8(2), 173186.
Kesselman, M.L. (1995). Comment: Putting the professor to bed: Mandatory retirement of tenured university faculty in the United States and Canada. Comparative Labour Law Journal, 17, 206249.
Khan, A.N. (1990). Mandatory retirement age for university professors. Journal of Law & Education, 19(1), 135146.
Krashinsky, M. (1988) The case for eliminating mandatory retirement: Why economics and human rights need not conflict. Canadian Public Policy — Analyse de Politiques, 14(1), 4051.
LaSelva, S.V. (1987). Note: Mandatory retirement: Intergenerational justice and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 20(1), 149162.
Lasswell, H.D., & McDougal, M.S. (1943). Legal education and pubUc policy: Professional training in the public interest. Yale Law Journal, 52, 203295.
LeBlanc, S., & McMullin, J.A. (1997). Falling through the cracks: Addressing the needs of individuals between employment and retirement. Canadian Public Policy — Analyse de Politiques, 23(3), 289304.
Lepofsky, M.D. (1992). The Canadian judicial approach to equality rights: Freedom ride or roller coaster? Law and Contemporary Problems, 55(1), 167199.
Levine, M.L. (1988). Age discrimination and the mandatory retirement controversy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
London, J.R. (1989). The Canadian experience in mandatory retirement: A human rights perspective. In Eekelaar, J.M. and Pearl, D. (Eds.), An aging world: Dilemmas and challenges for law and social policy, (pp. 329362). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lussier, G., & Wister, A.V. (1995). A study of workforce aging of the British Columbia Public Service, 1983–1991. Canadian Journal on Aging, 14(3), 480497.
McCormick, P. (1994). Canada's courts. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company.
McDonald, L. (1995). Editorial: Retirement for the rich and retirement for the poor: From social security to social welfare. Canadian Journal on Aging, 14(3), 447457.
McPherson, B.D. (1990). Aging as a social process (2nd ed.). Toronto: Butterworths.
Myles, J. (1995). The market's revenge: Old Age Security and social rights. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.
Myles, J., & Street, D. (1995). Should the economic life course be redesigned? Old Age Security in a time of transition. Canadian Journal on Aging, 14(2), 335359.
Rappaport, A.M. (1995). Employer policy and the future of employee benefits for an older population. Generations, 19(3), 6367.
Roadburg, A. (1985). Aging: Retirement, leisure and work in Canada. Toronto: Methuen.
Rosenberg, G.N. (1991). The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Statistics Canada. (1990). A portrait of seniors in Canada. Catalogue Number 89–59. Ottawa. September 1990.
Statistics Canada. (1992). Report on the demographic situation in Canada, 1992. Catalogue Number 91–209. Ottawa. November 1992.
Torres-Gil, F.M. (1992). The new aging: Politics and change in America. Westport, Conn.: Auburn House.
Wanner, R.A. (1994). Retirement and the older worker in Canada. In Frideres, J.S., and Bruce, C.J. (Eds.), The impact of an aging population on society, (pp. 7990). Calgary: University of Calgary Faculty of Social Sciences.
Wheeler, S., Cartwright, B., Kagan, R.A., & Friedman, L.M. (1987). Do the “haves” come out ahead? Winning and losing in state Supreme Courts, 1870–1970. Law & Society Review, 21(3), 403445.


The Heavy Hand of the Law: The Canadian Supreme Court and Mandatory Retirement*

  • Thomas R. Klassen (a1) and C. T. Gillin (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed