No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Two Conceptions of Inequality and Natural Difference
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 August 2005
Abstract
Abstract. I argue in this paper that there are certain similarities between Catharine MacKinnon, on the one hand, and Mary Wollstonecraft and Jean Jacques Rousseau, on the other, in the conception of inequality and its origins. All three make two important claims that characterize their accounts of inequality: first, that inequality is not natural, and second, that the differences which are alleged to justify inequality are in fact produced by the inequality. These two claims distinguish one way of arguing for equality. I contrast this with another way of arguing for equality, one which acknowledges natural differences.
Résumé. Dans ce texte, je soutiens qu'il y a des similarités entre les conceptions de l'inégalité et de ses origines de Catharine MacKinnon d'une part et de Rousseau et Wollstonecraft d'autre part. Tous trois soutiennent deux thèses importantes qui caractérisent leur conception de l'inégalité : premièrement, l'inégalité n'est pas naturelle; deuxièmement, les différences qui sont invoquées pour justifier l'inégalité sont en fait le produit de cette inégalité. Ces deux positions sont distinctives d'une ligne d'argumentation défendant l'égalité. Je contraste cette ligne d'argumentation avec une seconde façon de défendre l'égalité qui diffère de la première en ce qu'elle reconnaît les différences naturelles.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 787 - 809
- Copyright
- © 2004 Cambridge University Press
References
Bonnefon, Paul.
1898.
Montaigne et ses amis.
Paris:
Armand Colin et Compagnie.
Canovan, M.
1987.
“Rousseau's Two Concepts of Citizenship,”
in
Women in Western Political Theory, eds.
E. Kennedy and
S. Mendus.
Sussex:
Wheatsheaf Books, Harvester Press.
de Gournay, Marie.
1910.
“L'Égalité des hommes et des
femmes,” in
Marie de Gournay: Essai suivi de “L'Égalité
des hommes et des femmes” et du “Grief des dames” avec
des variantes, des notes, des appendices et un portrait, ed.
Mario Schiff.
Paris:
Honoré Champion.
de la Boetie, Étienne.
1992.
Discours de la servitude volontaire, ed.
Françoise Bayard.
Paris:
Imprimerie Nationale Éditions.
Deutscher, Penelope.
1997.
Yielding Gender: Feminism, Deconstruction and the History of
Philosophy.
London:
Routledge.
Dezeimeris, Reinhold.
1864.
De la rennaissance des lettres à Bordeaux au XVIe
siècle.
Bordeaux:
P. Chaumas.
Dworkin, Ronald.
1985.
A Matter of Principle.
Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
Ferguson, Susan.
1999.
“The Radical Ideas of Mary Wollstonecraft,”
Canadian Journal of Political Science, XXXII, no.
3,
427–50.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J.
1992.
Rethinking Obligation: a Feminist Method for Political
Theory.
Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
Jaggar, Alison.
1983.
Feminist Politics and Human Nature.
Brighton:
Harvester.
Keohane, Nannerl O.
1980.
Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the
Enlightenment.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
MacKinnon, Catharine A.
1989.
“Sex Equality: On Difference and Dominance,” in
Toward a Feminist Theory of the State.
Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press,
215–234.
MacKinnon, Catharine A.
1987.
“Difference and Dominance: On Sex
Discrimination,” in
Feminism Unmodified.
Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press,
32–45.
Mill, J. S.
1994.
“The Subjection of Women,” in
Sexual Equality: Writings by John Stuart Mill, Harriet Taylor Mill,
and Helen Taylor, eds.
Ann P. Robson and
John M. Robson.
Toronto:
University of Toronto Press.
Moi, Toril.
1999.
What is a Woman?
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Okin, Susan Moller.
1990.
Justice, Gender and the Family.
New York:
Basic Books.
Poullain de la Barre, François.
1989.
De l'égalité des deux sexes,
trans. A. Daniel Frankforter and Paul J. Morman,
Studies in the History of Philosophy, Vol. 11.
Lewiston:
The Edwin Mellen Press.
Richards, Janet Radcliffe.
1982.
The Sceptical Feminist.
Harmondsworth:
Penguin.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.
1965.
Discours sur l'origine et les fondements de
linégalité parmi les homes.
Paris:
Éditions Gallimard.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.
1961.
Émile ou de l'éducation.
Paris:
Éditions Garnier Frères.
Sapiro, Virginia, and
Penny A. Weiss
1996.
“Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft: Restoring the
Conversation,” in
Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed.
Maria J.
Falco, University Park:
The Pennsylvania State University Press, pp.
179–207.
Sapiro, Virginia.
1992.
A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary
Wollstonecraft.
Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, Barbara.
1993.
Eve and the New Jerusalem.
Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
Weiss, Penny A.
1996.
“Wollstonecraft and Rousseau: The Gendered Fate of Political
Theorists,” in
Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed.
Maria J. Falco.
University Park:
The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Wollstonecraft, Mary.
1989a.
Vindication of the Rights of Woman, in
The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Vol. 5, eds.
J. Todd and
M. Butler.
London:
William Pickering.
Wollstonecraft, Mary.
1989b.
Vindication of the Rights of Men, in
The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Vol. 5, eds.
J. Todd and
M. Butler.
London:
William Pickering.
Wollstonecraft, Mary.
1989c.
An Historical and Moral View of the Origin and Progress of the
French Revolution; and the Effect It Has produced in Europe in
The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Vol. 6.
London:
William Pickering.
Young, Iris Marion.
1990.
Justice and the Politics of Difference.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Young, Iris Marion.
1986.
“Beyond the Unhappy Marriage: a Critique of the Dual Systems
Theory,” in
The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: A Debate on Class and
Patriarchy, ed.
L. Sargent.
London:
Pluto Press.