Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T14:39:59.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative X-Ray Computed Tomography (CT) in Dementia of the Alzheimer Type (DAT)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

J.S. Luxenberg*
Affiliation:
Section Brain Aging and Dementia, Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
R.P. Friedland
Affiliation:
Section Brain Aging and Dementia, Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
S.I. Rapoport
Affiliation:
Section Brain Aging and Dementia, Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
*
Laboratory of Neurosciences, Section on Brain Aging and Dementia, National Institute on Aging, Building 10, Room 12S235B, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) has proven to be difficult to diagnose using computerized X-ray tomography (CT). To improve the identification of DAT with CT, several different quantitative approaches have been tried. Brain parenchymal density measurements and a variety of linear indices of ventricular size have failed to reliably separate DAT patients from age matched controls. Measures of ventricular volume improve discrimination, but overlap with controls persists. The inadequacy of a single CT study to diagnose DAT is clearly related to the overlap of brain atrophy in DAT and healthy aging, a finding which has also been noted in post-mortem studies. Estimating the rate of ventricular enlargement from quantitative measurements of ventricular size on successive CT scans may allow the physician to take advantage of the progressive nature of DAT, improving separation of DAT patients from healthy controls.

Type
Imaging of Demented Subjects
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1986

References

1.Hounsfield, GN.Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 1973; 46: 10161022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Huckman, MS, Fox, J, Topel, J.The validity of criteria for the evaluation of cerebral atrophy by computed tomography. Radiol 1975; 116: 8592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Synek, V, Reuben, JR, Du Boulay, GH.Comparing Evan’s index and computerized axial tomography in assessing relationship of ventricular size to brain size. Neurol 1976; 26: 231233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Tomlinson, BE, Blessed, G, Roth, M.Observations on the brains of demented old people. J Neurol Sci 1970; 2: 205242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Cummings, JL, Benson, DF.Dementia. A Clinical Approach. Boston, Butterworth Publishers, 1983.Google Scholar
6.Takeda, S, Matsuzawa, T.Brain atrophy during aging. A quantitative study using computed tomography. J Am Geriatr Soc 1984; 32: 520524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Schwartz, M, Creasey, H, Grady, CL, et al. Computed tomographic analysis of brain morphometries in 30 healthy men, aged 21 to 81 years. Ann Neurol 1985; 17: 146157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Hubbard, BM, Anderson, JM.A quantitative study of cerebral atrophy in old age and senile dementia. J Neurol Sci 1981; 50: 135145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.George, AE, de Leon, MJ, Ferris, SH, et al. Parenchymal CT correlates of senile dementia [Alzheimer disease]: loss of gray-white matter discriminability. AJNR 1981; 2: 205213.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Gado, M, Patel, J, Hughes, CP, et al. Brain atrophy in dementia judged by CT scan ranking. AJNR 1983; 4: 499500.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Albert, M, Naeser, MA, Levine, HL, et al. CT density numbers in patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Arch Neurol 1984; 41: 12641269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Gado, M, Phelps, M.The peripheral zone of increased density in cranial computed tomography. Radiol 1975; 117: 7174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Hahn, FJ, Rim, K, Schapiro, RL.A quantitative analysis of ventricular size on computed tomographic scans. Computed Axial Tomogr 1977; 1: 121125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Jacoby, RJ, Levy, R, Dawson, JM.Computed tomography in the elderly: 1. The normal population. Brit J Psychiat 1980; 136: 249255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Brinkman, SD, Sarwar, M, Levin, HS, et al. Qualitative indexes of computed tomography in dementia and normal aging. Radiol 1981; 138: 8992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Soininen, H, Puranen, M, Riekkinen, PJ.Computed tomography findings in senile dementia and normal aging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1982; 45: 5054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Arai, H, Kobayashi, K, Ikeda, K, et al. A computed tomography study of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol 1983; 229: 6977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Albert, M, Naeser, MA, Levine, HL, et al. Ventricular size in patients with presenile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Arch Neurol 1984; 41: 12581263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Roberts, MA, Caird, FI.Computerized tomography and intellectual impairment in the elderly. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1976; 39: 986989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Zatz, LM Jr., Jernigan, TL, Ahumada, AJ.White matter changes in cerebral computed tomography related to aging. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1982; 6: 1923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Turkheimer, E, Munro Cullum, C, Hubler, DW, et al. Quantifying cortical atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1984; 47: 13141318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Gado, M, Hughes, CP, Danziger, W, et al. Volumetric measurements of the cerebrospinal fluid spaces in demented patients and controls. Radiol 1982; 144: 535538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.George, AE, de Leon, MJ, Rosenbloom, S, et al. Ventricular volume and cognitive deficit: a computed tomographic study. Radiol 1983; 149: 493498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Sundsten, JW, Prothero, JW.Three-dimensional reconstruction from serial sections: ii. A microcomputer-based facility for rapid data collection. Anat Rec 1983; 207: 665671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.DeLeo, JM, Schwartz, M, Creasey, H, et al. Computer-assisted categorization of brain computerized tomography pixels into cerebrospinal fluid, white matter, and gray matter. Comp Biomed Res 1985; 18: 7988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Creasey, H, Schwartz, M, Frederickson, H, et al. Quantitative computed tomography in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurol in press.Google Scholar
27.Bird, JM.Computerized tomography, atrophy and dementia. A review. Prog Neurobiol 1982; 19: 91115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.McGeer, PL.Brain imaging in Alzheimer’s disease. Brit Med Bull 1986; 42: 2428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Gado, M, Hughes, CP, Danziger, W, et al. Aging, dementia, and brain atrophy: a longitudinal computed tomographic study. AJNR 1983; 4: 699702.Google ScholarPubMed
30.Brinkman, SD, Largen, JW. JrChanges in brain ventricular size with repeated cat scans in suspected Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psych 1984; 141: 8183.Google ScholarPubMed
31.Luxenberg, J, Creasey, H, Haxby, J, et al. The rate of ventricular enlargement in dementia of the Alzheimer type correlates with rate of neuropsychological deterioration. [Abstract] J Nucl Med 1986; 27: 1024.Google Scholar
32.Koehler, PR, Anderson, RE, Baxter, B.The effect of computed tomography viewer controls on anatomical measurements. Radiol 1979; 130: 189194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Baxter, BS, Sorenson, JA.Factors affecting the measurement of size and CT number in computed tomography. Invest Radiol 1981; 16: 337341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.McGeer, PL, Kamo, H, Harrop, R, et al. Positron emission tomography in patients with clinically diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease. Can Med Assoc J 1986; 134: 597607.Google ScholarPubMed
35.Erkinjuntti, T, Sipponen, JT, Iivanainen, M, et al. Cerebral NMR and CT imaging in dementia. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1984; 8: 614618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Zhu, XP, Checkley, DR, Hickey, DS, et al. Accuracy of area measurements made from MRI images compared with computed tomography. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1986; 10: 96102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar