Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:47:03.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Rivastigmine on Memory and Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Vahid Shaygannejad
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Mohsen Janghorbani*
Affiliation:
Medical School Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Fereshteh Ashtari
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Hamid Afshar Zanjani
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Naser Zakizade
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
*
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Cognitive dysfunction is one of the common clinical symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS), but there is no effective treatment for it.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of rivastigmine in treating memory and cognitive dysfunction in MS.

Methods:

A single-center double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted from October 2005 to February 2007. Sixty definite MS patients with cognitive impairment age 16 to 54 years were randomly allocated to receive a 12-week treatment course of either rivastigmine (1.5 mg once a day increment over 4 weeks to 3 mg twice daily) or placebo. Response to treatment was assessed by the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) at baseline and 12 weeks after start of therapy.

Results:

A slight, but significant memory improvement occurred in both groups. Of the 30 patients treated with rivastigmine, the mean (SD) WMS general memory score increased from 60.3 (4.2) at baseline to 64.9 (5.3) at the end of study period (P<0.001). Correspondingly, in the 30 patients treated with placebo, the mean (SD) WMS general memory score increased from 60.5 (4.9) to 64.5 (3.7) (P < 0.001). The average WMS general memory score at the end of trial did not changed between rivastigmine and placebo group (mean difference, 0.4; 95% CI, -2.0, 2.8).

Conclusion:

No significant differences were seen between rivastigmine and placebo on the mean (SD) WMS general memory score. A larger multicenter study of rivastigmine in MS is warranted in order to more definitely assess the efficacy of this intervention.

Résumé:

RÉSUMÉ:Contexte:

La dysfonction cognitive est l’un des symptômes cliniques fréquents dans la sclérose en plaques (SEP), pour lequel il n’existe aucun traitement efficace. Objectif : Le but de cette étude était d’évaluer l’effet de la rivastigmine dans le traitement de la dysfonction mnésique et cognitive de la SEP.

Méthodes:

Nous avons effectué un essai clinique randomisé à double insu, contrôlé par placebo, dans un seul centre entre octobre 2005 et février 2007. Soixante patients atteints de SEP certaine avec atteinte cognitive, âgés de 16 à 54 ans, ont été randomisés à recevoir un traitement par la rivastigmine (1,5 mg une fois par jour avec augmentation progressive de la dose sur une période de 4 semaines jusqu’à une dose de 3 mg deux fois par jour) ou un placebo pendant 12 semaines. Le Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) utilisé en début d’étude et après 12 semaines de traitement a servi à évaluer la réponse au traitement.

Résultats:

Une amélioration a été observée dans les deux groupes. Cette amélioration, bien que légère, était significative. Chez les 30 patients sous rivastigmine, le score général moyen pour la mémoire auWMS est passé de 60,3 (ÉT 4,2) avant traitement à 64,9 (ÉT 5,3) à la fin de la période de traitement (p < 0,01). Chez les 30 patients sous placebo, le score général moyen pour la mémoire au WMS est passé de 60,5 (4,9) à 64,5 (ÉT 3,7) (p < 0,001). La moyenne du score général pour la mémoire au WMS à la fin de l’étude n’avait pas changé significativement entre les deux groupes (différence moyenne 0,4; IC à 95% : –2,0 à 2,8).

Conclusion:

Aucune différence significative du score général pour la mémoire au WMS n’a été observée entre les patients qui ont reçu la rivastigmine et ceux qui ont reçu le placebo. Une étude multicentres de plus grande envergure sur l’utilité de la rivastigmine dans la SEP est justifiée, afin d’évaluer de façon définitive l’efficacité de cette intervention.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2008

References

1. Bobholz, JA, Rao, SM. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a review of recent developments. Curr Opin Neurol. 2003; 16(3):2838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Amato, MP, Ponziani, G, Siracusa, G, Sorbi, S. Cognitive dysfunction in early-onset multiple sclerosis: a reappraisal after 10 years. Arch Neurol. 2001; 58(10):16026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Amato, MP, Ponziani, G, Pracucci, G, Bracco, L, Siracusa, G, Amaducci, L. Cognitive impairment in early-onset multiple sclerosis. Pattern, predictors, and impact on everyday life in a 4- year follow-up. Arch Neurol. 1995; 52(2):16872.Google Scholar
4. Rao, SM, Leo, GJ, Ellington, L, Nauertz, T, Bernardin, L, Unverzagt, F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. II. Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology. 1991; 41(5): 6926.Google Scholar
5. Wild, KV, Lezak, MD, Whitman, RH, Bourdette, DN. Psychosocial impact of cognitive impairment in the multiple sclerosis patient. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1991; 13:74.Google Scholar
6. Beatty, WW, Blanco, CR, Wilbanks, SL, Paul, RH, Hames, KA. Demographic, clinical, and cognitive characteristics of multiple sclerosis patients who continue to work. J Neurol Rehabil. 1995; 9:16773.Google Scholar
7. Schultheis, MT, Garay, E, Millis, SR, Deluca, J. Motor vehicle crashes and violations among drivers with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(8):11758.Google Scholar
8. Schultheis, MT, Garay, E, Deluca, J. The influence of cognitive impairment on driving performance in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2001; 56(8):108994.Google Scholar
9. Fischer, JS. Assessment of neuropsychological function. In: Rudick, RA, Goodkin, DE, editors. Multiple sclerosis therapeutics. London: Martin Dunitz; 1999. p. 3147.Google Scholar
10. Amato, MP, Portaccio, E, Zipoli, V. Are there protective treatments for cognitive decline in MS? J Neur Sci. 2006; 245(1-2):1836.Google Scholar
11. Pliskin, NH, Hamer, DP, Goldstein, DS, Towle, VL, Reder, AT, Noronha, A, et al. Improved delayed visual reproduction test performance in multiple sclerosis patients receiving interferon beta-1b. Neurology. 1996; 47(6):14638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Barak, Y, Achiron, A. Effect of interferon-beta-1b on cognitive functions in multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol. 2002; 47(1):1114.Google Scholar
13. Weinstein, A, Schwid, SR, Schiffer, RB, McDermott, MP, Giang, DW, Goodman, AD. Neuropsychologic status in multiple sclerosis after treatment with glatiramer. Arch Neurol. 1999; 56(3): 31924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Fischer, JS, Priore, RL, Jacobs, LD, Cookfair, DL, Rudick, RA, Herndon, RM, et al. Neuropsychological effects of interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group. Ann Neurol. 2000; 48(6): 88592.Google Scholar
15. Cohen, RA, Fisher, M. Amantadine treatment of fatigue associated with multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1989; 46(6):67680.Google Scholar
16. Geisler, MW, Sliwinski, M, Coyle, PK, Masur, DM, Doscher, C, Krupp, LB. The effects of amantadine and pemoline on cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1996; 53(2): 1858.Google Scholar
17. Amato, MP. Donepezil for memory impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2005; 4(2):723.Google Scholar
18. Krupp, LB, Christodoulou, C, Melville, P, Scherl, WF, MacAllister, WS, Elkins, LE. Donepezil improved memory in multiple sclerosis in a randomized clinical trial. Neurology. 2004; 63(9):157985.Google Scholar
19. Evans, JG, Wilcock, G, Birks, J. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004; 7(3): 35169.Google Scholar
20. Birks, JS, Harvey, R. Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003 (3) CD001190.Google Scholar
21. Leo, GJ, Rao, SM. Effects of intravenous physostigmine and lecithin on memory in multiple sclerosis: report of a pilot study. J Neurol Rehabil. 1988; 2:1239.Google Scholar
22. Christodoulou, C, Melville, P, Scherl, WF, Macallister, WS, Elkins, LE, Krupp, LB. Effects of donepezil on memory and cognition in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2006; 245(1-2):12736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Unverzgagt, FW, Rao, SM, Antuono, PG. Oral physostigmine in the treatment of memory loss in multiple sclerosis (MS). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1991; 13:74.Google Scholar
24. Krupp, LB, Elkins, LE, Scheffer, S, Smiroldo, J, Coyle, PKl. Donepezil for the treatment of memory impairments in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1999; 52 Suppl. 2: A137.Google Scholar
25. Greene, YM, Tariot, PN, Wishart, H, Cox, C, Holt, CJ, Schwid, S, et al. A 12-week, open trial of donepezil hydrochloride in patients with multiple sclerosis and associated cognitive impairments. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000; 20(3):3506.Google Scholar
26. Ruberg, M, Villageois, A, Bonnet, AM, Rieger, F, Agid, Y, Fahn, S. Acetyl cholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase activity in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with neurodegenerative diseases involving cholinergic systems. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987; 50(5):53843.Google Scholar
27. Brufani, M, Filocamo, L. Rational design of cholinesterase inhibitors. In: Giacobini, E, editor. Cholineterase and cholinesterase inhibitors. London: Martin Dunitz; 2000.Google Scholar
28. Darreh-Shori, T, Almkvist, O, Guan, ZZ, Garlind, A, Strandberg, B, Svensson, AL, et al. Sustained cholinesterase inhibition in AD patients receiving rivastigmine for 12 months. Neurology. 2002; 59(4):56372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Poser, CM, Paty, DW, Scheinberg, L, McDonald, WI, Davis, FA, Ebers, GC, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guideline for research protocols. Ann Neurol. 1983; 13(3): 22731.Google Scholar
30. Kurtzke, JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983; 33(11):14452.Google Scholar
31. Wechsler, D. Wechsler memory scale (3rd ed. (WAIS-III)). New York: Psychological Corporation; 1998.Google Scholar
32. Rao, SM, Leo, GJ, Bernardin, L, Unverzagt, F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology. 1991; 41(5):68591.Google Scholar
33. Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Neurology. 1993; 43(4):65561.Google Scholar
34. Jacobs, LD, Cookfair, DL, Rudick, RA, Herndon, RM, Richert, JR, Salazar, AM, et al. Intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis. The Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group (MSCRG). Ann Neurol. 1996; 39(3):28594.Google Scholar
35. Bakshi, R. Fatigue associated with multiple sclerosis: diagnosis, impact and management. Mult Scler. 2003; 9(3):21927.Google Scholar
36. Corey-Bloom, J, Anand, R, Veach, J.; for the ENA 713 B352 Study Group. A randomized trial evaluating efficacy and safety of ENA 713 (rivastigmine tartrate), a new acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychopharmacol. 1998; 1:5565.Google Scholar
37. Rösler, M, Anand, R, Cicin-Sain, A, Gauthier, S, Agid, Y, Dal-Bianco, P, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: international randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1999; 318(7184):6338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed