Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T12:20:47.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Botulinum Toxin-A use in Paediatric Hypertonia: Canadian Practice Patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

D. Fehlings*
Affiliation:
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto
U. Narayanan
Affiliation:
The Hospital for Sick Children
J. Andersen
Affiliation:
Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton
R. Beauchamp
Affiliation:
BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
J. W. Gorter
Affiliation:
HHS McMaster University, Hamilton
A. Kawamura
Affiliation:
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
G. Kiefer
Affiliation:
Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta
M. Mason
Affiliation:
Oshawa Clinic, Oshawa
A. McCormick
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario
R. Mesterman
Affiliation:
HHS McMaster University, Hamilton
L. Switzer
Affiliation:
Bloorview Research Institute
J. Watt
Affiliation:
Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton
*
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4G 1R8, Canada. Email: dfehlings@hollandbloorview.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

This study aims to assess current practices of Canadian physicians providing botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) treatments for children with hypertonia and to contrast these with international “best practice” recommendations, in order to identify practice variability and opportunities for knowledge translation.

Methods:

Thirteen Canadian physicians assembled to develop and analyze results of a cross-sectional electronic survey, sent to 50 physicians across Canada.

Results:

Seventy-eight percent (39/50) of physicians completed the survey. The most frequently identified assessment tools were Gross Motor Function Classification System, Modified Tardieu Scale and neurological examination. Goal-setting tools were infrequently utilized. Common indications for BoNT-A injections and the muscles injected were identified. Significant variability was identified in using BoNT-A for hip displacement associated with hypertonia. The most frequent adverse event reported was localized weakness; 54% reporting this “occasionally“ and 15% “frequently”. Generalized weakness, fatigue, ptosis, diplopia, dysphagia, aspiration, respiratory distress, dysphonia and urinary incontinence were reported rarely or never. For dosage, 52% identified 16 Units/kg body weight of Botox® as maximum. A majority (64%) reported a maximum 400 Units for injection at one time. For localization, electrical stimulation and ultrasound were used infrequently (38% and 19% respectively). Distraction was the most frequently used pain-management technique (64%).

Conclusions:

Canadian physicians generally adhere to international best practices when using BoNT-A to treat paediatric hypertonia. Two knowledge-translation opportunities were identified: use of individualized goal setting prior to BoNT-A and enhancing localization techniques. Physicians reported a good safety profile of BoNT-A in children.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2012

References

1.Jankovic, J, Brin, MF.Therapeutic uses of botulinum toxin. N Engl J Med. 1991;25(324)(17):118694.Google Scholar
2.Delgado, M, Hirtz, D, Aisen, M, et al.Practice parameter: Pharmacologic treatment of spasticity in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (an evidence-based review): report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the practice committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2010;74(4):33643.Google Scholar
3.Health Canada [Internet]. Ottawa: Information Update; Health Canada reviewing issue of distant toxin spread potentially associated with Botox and Botox Cosmetic; [about 3 screens]. [updated 2008 Feb 20; cited 2011 Aug 8]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/media/advisoriesavis/_2008/2008_32-eng.phpGoogle Scholar
4.Fehlings, D, Novak, I, Berweck, S, Hoare, B, Stott, N, Russo, R.Botulinum toxin assessment, intervention and follow-up for paediatric upper limb hypertonicity: international consensus statement. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17:3856.Google Scholar
5.Love, SC, Novak, I, Kentish, M, et al.Botulinum toxin assessment, intervention and after-care for lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy: international consensus statement. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(Suppl 2):937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Heinen, F, Desloovere, K, Schroeder, AS, et al.The updated European consensus 2009 on the use of botulinum toxin for children with cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010;14(1): 4566. Epub Nov 14, 2009.Google Scholar
7.World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.Google Scholar
8.Naumann, M, Albanese, A, Heinen, F, Molenaers, G, Relja, M.Safety and efficacy of botulinum type A following long-term use. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13(Suppl 4):3540.Google Scholar
9.Goldstein, FM.Safety of high-dose botulinum toxin type A therapy for the treatment of pediatric spasticity. J Child Neurol. 2006;21:28992.Google Scholar
10.Pascual-Pascual, SI, Pascual-Castroviejo, I.Safety of botulinum toxin type A in children younger than 2 years. Eur J Pediatr Neurol. 2009;13:51115.Google Scholar
11.Albavera-Hernandez, C, Rodriguez, JM, Idrovo, AJ.Safety of botulinum toxin A among children with spascity secondary to cerebral palsy: systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:394407.Google Scholar
12.Naidu, K, Smith, K, Sheedy, M, Adair, B, Yu, X, Graham, K.Systemic adverse events following botulinum toxin A therapy in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:13944.Google Scholar
13.Kolaski, K, Ajizian, SJ, Passmore, L, Pasutharnchat, N, Koman, LA, Smith, BP.Safety profile of multilevel chemical denervation procedures using phenol or botulinum toxin or both in a pediatric population. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;87(7):55666.Google Scholar
14.O’Flaherty, SJ, Janakan, V, Morrow, AM, Scheinberg, AN, Waugh, M-C A.Adverse events and health status following botulinum toxin A injections in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:12530.Google Scholar
15.Narayanan, UG.Botulinum toxin: does the black box warning justify change in practice? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:1012.Google Scholar
16.Schroeder, AS, Ertl-Wagner, B, Britsch, S, et al.Muscle biopsy substantiates long-term MRI alterations one year after a single dose of botulinum toxin injected into the lateral gastrocnemius muscle of healthy volunteers. Mov Disord. 2009;24:1494503.Google Scholar
17.Albusaini, A, Crosbie, J, Shepherd, R, Daean, C, Scheinberg, A.No change in muscle passive stiffness following botulinum toxin injection in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:5438.Google Scholar
18.Schroeder, AS, Koerte, I, Berweck, S, Ertl-Wagner, Heinen F.How doctors think and treat with botulinum toxin. Letter to the editor. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:8756.Google Scholar
19.Barrett, RS.What are the long-term consequences of botulinum toxin injections in spastic cerebral palsy? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:485.Google Scholar
20.Bedard, P, Tardif, L, Ferland, A, et al.A medication reconciliation form and its impact on the medical record in a paediatric hospital. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;17:2227.Google Scholar
21.Chin, TY, Nattrass, GR, Selber, P, Graham, HK.Accuracy of intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin A in juvenile cerebral palsy: a comparison between needle placement and placement guided by electrical stimulation. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:28691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Yang, EJ, Rha, D-W, Yoo, JK, Park, ES.Accuracy of needle placement for gastrocnemius muscle in children with cerebral palsy checked against ultrasonography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90:7414.Google Scholar