Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T06:26:31.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Duality between Coalescing Brownian Motions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Jie Xiong
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G1 and Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1300 U.S.A.
Xiaowen Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, H4B 1R6 e-mail: xzhou@mathstat.concordia.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A duality formula is found for coalescing Brownian motions on the real line. It is shown that the joint distribution of a coalescing Brownian motion can be determined by another coalescing Brownian motion running backward. This duality is used to study a measure-valued process arising as the high density limit of the empirical measures of coalescing Brownian motions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2005

References

[1] Arratia, R. A., Coalescing Brownian motions on the line. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1979.Google Scholar
[2] Dawson, D. A., Li, Z. H. and Wang, H., Superprocesses with dependent spatial motion and general branching densities. Electron. J. Probab. 6 (2001), 133.Google Scholar
[3] Dawson, D. A., Li, Z. H. and Zhou, X., Superprocesses with coalescing Brownian spatial motion as large scale limits. to appear in J. Theo. Probab.Google Scholar
[4] Dawson, D. A. and Perkins, E., Measure-valued processes and renormalization of branching particle systems. In: Stochastic Partial Differential Equations: Six Perspectives (R. A. Carmona and Rozovskii, B., eds.), Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999, pp. 45106.Google Scholar
[5] Donnelly, P., Evans, S. N., Fleischmann, K., T. G. Kurtz and Zhou, X., Continuum-sites stepping-stone models, coalescing exchangeable partitions, and random trees. Ann. Probab. 28 (2000), 10631110.Google Scholar
[6] Ethier, S. N. and Kurtz, T. G., Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence.Wiley, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
[7] Evans, S. N., Coalescing Markov labeled partitions and a continuous sites genetics model with infinitely many types. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 33 (1997), 339358.Google Scholar
[8] Harris, T. E., Coalescing and noncoalescing stochastic flows i. R1. Stoch. Process. Appl. 17 (1984), 187210.Google Scholar
[9] Jacod, J. and Shiryaev, A. N., Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.Google Scholar
[10] Liggett, T. M., Interacting Particle Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
[11] Meyer, P. A., Probability and Potentials. Blaisdell Publishing Company, Toronto, 1966.Google Scholar
[12] Perkins, E., Dawson-Watanabe Superprocesses and Measure-valued Diffusions. Lectures on probability theory and statistics, Lecture Notes in Math., 1781, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002, pp. 125324.Google Scholar
[13] Soucaliuc, F., Tóth, B. and Werner, W., Reflection and coalescence between independent one-dimensional Brownian paths. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 36(2000) 509545.Google Scholar