Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-xbbwl Total loading time: 0.246 Render date: 2021-03-02T14:06:41.345Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Phenotypic plasticity in clutch size regulation among populations of a potential invasive fruit fly from environments that vary in host heterogeneity and isolation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2018

M. Aluja
Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Apartado Postal 63, 91000 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
A. Birke
Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Apartado Postal 63, 91000 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
F. Díaz-Fleischer
INBIOTECA, Universidad Veracruzana, 91000 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
J. Rull
PROIMI Biotecnología-CONICET, LIEMEN-División Control Biológico de Plagas, Av. Belgrano y Pje. Caseros, T4001MVB San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina
E-mail address:


Phenotypic plasticity is thought to evolve in response to environmental unpredictability and can shield genotypes from selection. However, selection can also act on plastic traits. Egg-laying behaviour, including clutch size regulation, is a plastic behavioural trait among tephritid fruit flies. We compared plasticity in clutch size regulation among females of Anastrepha ludens populations stemming from environments that differed in the degree of predictability in egg-laying opportunities. Clutch size regulation in response to hosts of different sizes was compared among flies from (a) a wild, highly isolated population, (b) a wild population that switches seasonally from a small wild host fruit that varies greatly in abundance to an abundant large-sized commercial host, and (c) a laboratory population. Flies from all three populations adjusted clutch number and size according to host size. However, flies from the heterogeneous wild environment were more plastic in adjusting clutch size than flies from agricultural settings that also laid fewer eggs; yet both populations were more plastic in adjusting clutch size in line with host size when compared with laboratory females. When wild and orchard females encountered the largest host, clutch size was extremely variable and egg regulation did not follow the same trend. Heterogeneity in host availability in space and time appears to be as important as seasonal variation in host size in maintaining plastic clutch size regulation behaviour. In stable environments, there was a clear reduction in the plasticity of these traits.

Research Papers
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.


Aluja, M. (1994). Bionomics and management of Anastrepha. Annual Review of Entomology 39, 155178.10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.001103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aluja, M., Piñero, J., Jácome, I., Díaz-Fleischer, F. & Sivinski, J. (2000). Behavior of flies in the genus Anastrepha (Trypetinae: Toxotrypanini). pp. 375408 in Aluja, M. & Norrbom, A.L. (Eds) Fruit flies (Tephritidae): Phylogeny and Evolution of Behavior. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Aluja, M., Díaz-Fleischer, F., Papaj, D.R., Lagunes, G. & Sivinski, J. (2001). Effects of age, diet, female density and host resource on egg-load in Anastrepha ludens and A. obliqua (Diptera: Tephiritidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 47, 975988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aluja, M., Rull, J., Pérez-Staples, D., Díaz-Fleischer, F. & Sivinski, J. (2009). Random mating among Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) adults of geographically distant and ecologically distinct populations in Mexico. Bulletin of Entomological Research 99, 207214.10.1017/S0007485308006299CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aluja, M., Birke, A., Guillén, L., Díaz-Fleischer, F. & Nestel, D. (2011 a). Coping with an unpredictable and stressful environment: the life history and metabolic response to variable food and host availability in a polyphagous tephritid fly. Journal of Insect Physiology 57, 15921601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aluja, M., Guillén, L., Rull, J., Höhn, H., Frey, J., Graf, B. & Samietz, J. (2011 b). Is the Alpine divide becoming more permeable to biological invasions as a result of global warming? Insights on the invasion and establishment of the walnut husk fly, Rhagoletis completa (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Switzerland. Bulletin of Entomological Research 101, 451465.10.1017/S0007485311000010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aluja, M., Birke, A., Ceymann, M., Guillén, L., Arrigoni, E., Baumgartner, D., Pascacio-Villafán, C. & Samietz, J. (2014). Agroecosystems resilience to an invasive insect species that could expand its geographical range in response to global climate change. Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment 186, 5463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auld, J.R., Agrawal, A.A. & Relyea, R.A. (2010). Re-evaluating the costs and limits of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277, 503511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J. & Bates, D.M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 390412.10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badyaev, A. (2005). Stress-induced variation in evolution: from behavioural plasticity to genetic assimilation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272, 877886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B. (2011). Lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes. R Package Version 0.999375-42. Available online at (accessed 20 November 2016).Google Scholar
Birke, A., Guillén, L., Midgarden, D. & Aluja, M. (2013). Fruit flies, Anastrepha ludens (Loew), A. obliqua (Macquart) and A. grandis (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae): three pestiferous tropical fruit flies that could potentially expand their range to temperate areas. pp. 192213 in Peña, J. (Ed.) Potential Invasive Pests of Agricultural Crops. FL, CABI International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S.P., Dingle, H. & Klassen, S.P. (1997). Genetic differentiation of fitness-associated traits among rapidly evolving populations of the soapberry bug. Evolution 51, 11821188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, S.P., Klassen, S.T.P. & Dingle, H. (1998). Rapidly evolving adaptations to host ecology and nutrition in the soapberry bug. Evolutionary Ecology 12, 955968.10.1023/A:1006568206413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmantier, A., McCleery, R.H., Cole, L.R., Perrins, C., Loeske, E.B., Kruuk, B.C. & Sheldon, B.C. (2008). Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population. Science 320, 800803.10.1126/science.1157174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chown, S.L., Slabber, S., McGeoch, M.A., Janion, C. & Leinaas, H.P. (2007). Phenotypic plasticity mediates climate change responses among invasive and indigenous arthropods. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274, 25312537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, A.M., Jennions, M. & Nicotra, A.B. (2011). Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 14, 419431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, G.M. & Gray, A. (2015). Don't let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology & Evolution 5, 52955304.10.1002/ece3.1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Fleischer, F. & Aluja, M. (2003 a). Behavioural plasticity in relation to egg and time limitation: the case of two fly species in the genus Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae). Oikos 100, 125133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Fleischer, F. & Aluja, M. (2003 b). Influence of conspecific presence, experience, and host quality on oviposition behavior and clutch size determination in Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 16, 537554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Fleischer, F., Papaj, D.R., Prokopy, R.J., Norrbom, A.L. & Aluja, M. (2000). Evolution of fruit fly oviposition behavior. pp. 811842 in Aluja, M. & Norrbom, A.L. (Eds) Fruit Flies (Tephritidae): Phylogeny and Evolution of Behaviour. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Duyck, P.F., David, P. & Quilici, S. (2004). A review of relationships between interspecific competition and invasions in fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ecological Entomology 29, 511520.10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00638.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, S., Griesser, M., Nystrand, M. & Ekman, J. (2006). Predation risk induces changes in nest-site selection and clutch size in the Siberian jay. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273, 701706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ernande, B. & Dieckmann, U. (2004). The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in spatially structured environments: implications of intraspecific competition, plasticity costs and environmental characteristics. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17, 613628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flatt, T. (2005). The evolutionary genetics of canalization. The Quarterly Review of Biology 80, 287316.10.1086/432265CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fordyce, J.A. (2005). Clutch size plasticity in the Lepidoptera. pp. 125144 in Ananthakrishnan, T.N. & Whitman, D.W. (Eds) Insects and Phenotypic Plasticity. Enfield, NH, Science Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Fox, C.W. & Czesak, M.E. (2000). Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 45, 341369.10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frey, J., Guillén, L., Frey, B., Samietz, J., Rull, J. & Aluja, M. (2013). Developing diagnostic SNP panels for the identification of true fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) within the limits of COI-based species delimitation. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13, 106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghalambor, C.K., McKay, J.K., Carroll, S.P. & Reznick, D.N. (2007). Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Functional Ecology 21, 394407.10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01283.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, A.S., Cameron, E.C., Sved, J.A. & Meats, A.W. (2012). Genetic consequences of domestication and mass rearing of pest fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 105, 10511056.10.1603/EC11421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jácome, I., Aluja, M. & Liedo, P. (1999). Impact of adult diet on demographic and population parameters of the tropical fruit fly Anastrepha serpentina (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 89, 165175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, M.A. & Snell, H.L. (2002). Life history trade-offs and phenotypic plasticity in the reproduction of Galapagos lava lizards (Microlophus delanonis). Oecologia 130, 4452.10.1007/s004420100776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karsten, M., van Vuuren, B.J., Barnaud, A. & Terblanche, J.S. (2013). Population genetics of Ceratitis capitata in South Africa: implications for dispersal and pest management. PLoS ONE 8, e54281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C.E. (2002). Evolutionary genetics of invasive plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, 386391.10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02554-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malacrida, A.R., Guglielmino, C.R., D’ Adamo, P., Torti, C., Marinoni, F. & Gasperi, G. (1996). Allozyme divergence and phylogenetic relationships among species of tephritid flies. Heredity 76, 592602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrbom, A.L. (2003). Host Plant Data Base for Anastrepha and Toxotrypana (Diptera: Tephritidae: Toxotrypanini). Diptera data dissemination disk. Washington, DC, CD-ROM, North Amer. Dipterist's Soc.Google Scholar
Oroño, L., Paulin, A.C., Alberti, A.C., Hilal, M., Ovruski, S., Vilardi, J.C., Rull, J. & Aluja, M. (2013). Effect of host plant chemistry on genetic differentiation and reduction of gene flow among Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) populations exploiting sympatric, synchronic hosts. Environmental Entomology 42, 790798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papadopoulos, N.T., Plant, R.E. & Carey, J.R. (2013). From trickle to flood: the large-scale, cryptic invasion of California by tropical fruit flies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280, 14661476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsons, K.J. & Robinson, B.W. (2006). Replicated evolution of integrated plastic responses during early adaptive divergence. Evolution 60, 801813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pecina-Quintero, J., López-Arroyo, I., Loera Gallardo, J., Pons, J.L., Hernández, N., Mayek Pérez, S., Hernández Delgado, S., Rull, J. & Aluja, M. (2009). Genetic differences between Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) populations stemming from a native and an exotic host in NE Mexico. Agricultura Técnica 35, 320328.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. (2005). Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52, 273288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online at Scholar
Plummer, C.C., McPhail, M. & Monk, J.W. (1941) The yellow chapote: a native host of the Mexican fruit fly. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 755, 112.Google Scholar
Relyea, R.A. (2001). Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology 82, 523540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, C.L., Bossdorf, O., Muth, N.Z., Gurevitch, J. & Pigliucci, M. (2006). Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecology Letters 9, 981993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schliserman, P., Aluja, M., Rull, J. & Ovruski, S. (2014). Habitat degradation and introduction of exotic plants favor persistence of invasive species and population growth of native polyphagous fruit fly pests in a Northwestern Argentinean mosaic. Biological Invasions 16, 25992613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutze, M., Krosch, M., Armstrong, K., Chapman, T., Englezou, A., Chomič, A. & Clarke, A. (2012). Population structure of Bactrocera dorsalis s.s., B. papayae and B. philippinensis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southeast Asia: evidence for a single species hypothesis using mitochondrial DNA and wing-shape data. BMC Evolutionary Biology 12, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D.B. (2003). Reproductive phenology of the Mexican fruit fly Anastrepha ludens (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the Sierra Madre Oriental, Northern Mexico. Neotropical Entomology 32, 385397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D.B. & Loera-Gallardo, J. (1998). Dispersal and longevity of mass-released, sterilized Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environmental Entomology 27, 10451052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Buskirk, J. & Relyea, R.A. (1998). Natural selection for phenotypic plasticity: predator-induced morphological responses in tadpoles. Biological Journal of Linnean Society 65, 301328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, L., Zhou, C., Xiao, Y., Zhang, P., Tang, Y. & Xu, Y.I.J.U.A.N. (2012). Insect oviposition plasticity in response to host availability: the case of the tephritid fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis. Ecological Entomology 37, 446452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 125 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st May 2018 - 2nd March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Phenotypic plasticity in clutch size regulation among populations of a potential invasive fruit fly from environments that vary in host heterogeneity and isolation
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Phenotypic plasticity in clutch size regulation among populations of a potential invasive fruit fly from environments that vary in host heterogeneity and isolation
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Phenotypic plasticity in clutch size regulation among populations of a potential invasive fruit fly from environments that vary in host heterogeneity and isolation
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *