Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:19:52.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

6.2 Assessment of Protein Degradability of Forage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

D. G. Filmer
D. G. Filmer*
Affiliation:
BOCM SILCOCK Ltd., Basingstoke
Get access

Extract

A new system for calculating the protein requirements of ruminants has been proposed by the Agricultural Research Council's sub-group on protein evaluation (Roy, Balch, Miller, Ørskov and Smith, 1977; ARC, 1980) to replace the now largely discredited Digestible Crude Protein (DCP) and Available Protein system.

There is little need to discuss the theory of the new system here as a number of excellent publications are now available outlining the new approach (e.g. Miller, Balch, Ørskov, Roy and Smith, 1977; Wilson and Strachan, 1981). Suffice to say that the new system requires the description of dietary crude protein in terms of rumen degradable protein (RDP) and undegradable protein (UDP) requirement for a specific energy input necessary for a particular level of production. Therefore, one of the important aspects of implementation of the new system is a description of the degradable/undegradable protein contents of feedstuffs. This not only applies to cereals, cereal by-products and protein concentrates used in the animal feed trade but also to the on-farm forages which may make up a considerable proportion of the diet of the dairy cow. It is this latter dietary component that is under consideration here but, in the first instance, it is worthwhile examining the importance of degradability overall, before considering the various aspects of forage protein degradability in particular.

Type
6. The Need for and the Value of Proposed Schemes in Practice
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 6: Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production , 1982 , pp. 129 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. The Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farn-ham Royal.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. 1960. Calorimetrie estimation of net energy in dried grass. Proc. 8th int. Grassld Congr. Reading, p. 485.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. 1979. In RDP/UDP Seminar, Birmingham. George A. Palmer Ltd., Oxney Rd., Peterborough.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, N. H., Thickett, W. S. and Wilson, P. N. 1973. The effect of varying protein level in a compound diet fed in conjunction with grass silage. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2: 70.Google Scholar
Czerkawski, J. W. and Breckenridge, G. 1977. Design and development of a long term rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Br. J. Nutr. 38: 371.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1977. The effect of protein content on the response of lactating cows to level of concentrate feeding. Anim. Prod. 25: 181–191.Google Scholar
Hagemeister, H., Lüpping, W. and Kaufmann, W. 1981. Microbial protein synthesis and digestion in the high-yielding dairy cow. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1980 (ed. Haresign, W.), Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Ling, J. R. and Buttery, P. J. 1978. The simultaneous use of ribonucleic acid, 35S, 2,6-diamino-pimelic acid and 2-aminoethylphosphonic acid as markers of microbial nitrogen entering the duodenum of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 39: 165–179.Google Scholar
Majdoub, A., Lane, G. T. and Aitchison, T. E. 1978. Milk production response to nitrogen solubility in dairy rations. J. Dairy Sci. 61: 59.Google Scholar
Miller, E. L., Balch, C. C., Ørskov, E. R., Roy, J. H. B. and Smith, R. H. 1977. Comparison of calculated nitrogen requirements for ruminants with the results of practical feeding trials. Proc. 2nd int. Symp. on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, p. 137. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and Mehrez, A. Z. 1977. Estimation of the extent of protein degradation from basal feeds in the rumen of sheep. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 36: 78 A.Google Scholar
Pichard, G. and van Soest, P. J. 1977. Protein solubility of ruminant feeds. Proc. 1977 Cornell Nutr. Conf. p. 91.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Balch, C. C., Miller, E. L., Ørskov, E. R. and Smith, R. H. 1977. Calculation of the nitrogen requirement for ruminants from nitrogen metabolism studies. In EAAP Publication 22 (ed. Taminga, S.), p. 126. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. and Strachan, P. J. 1981. The contribution of undegraded protein to the protein requirements of dairy cows. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1980 (ed. Haresign, W.), Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Wohlt, J. E. and Clark, J. H. 1978. Nutritional value of urea versus preformed protein for ruminants. I. Lactation of dairy cows fed corn based diets containing supplemental nitrogen from urea and/or soybean meal. J. Dairy Sci. 61: 902–915.Google Scholar