Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T18:37:52.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the range of tissue protein synthesis in pigs: the effect of thyroid hormones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

O. Simon ,
H. Bergner ,
R. Münchmeyer  and
Teresa Zebrowska
O. Simon
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Production and Veterinary Medicine, Humboldt-University, Berlin, German Democratic Republic
H. Bergner
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Production and Veterinary Medicine, Humboldt-University, Berlin, German Democratic Republic
R. Münchmeyer
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Production and Veterinary Medicine, Humboldt-University, Berlin, German Democratic Republic
Teresa Zebrowska
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Jablonna, Warsaw, Poland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The effects of thyroid hormones on the range of tissue protein synthesis in growing pigs using the constant infusion technique with [14c]leucine and [14C]lysine were studied.

2. During a 6 h infusion, samples were taken from blood and, at the end of the infusion, from liver, pancreas, stomach, small and large intestines, kidney cortex, kidney medulla, muscle and skin.

3. Lower relative specific radioactivities of free leucine and lysine in several tissues were observed in the hormone-treated group than in the untreated one.

4. The range of protein synthesis rate and the daily amount of protein synthesized in tissues was higher in all tissues after application of thyroid hormones.

5. Assuming that the organs analysed represented 70% of the total trichloroacetic acid-precipitable protein of the pig, the estimated range of daily protein synthesis was 251–490 and 312–880 g in untreated and hormone-treated pigs respectively.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , November 1982 , pp. 571 - 582
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1982

References

REFERENCES

Airhart, J., Vidrich, A. & Khairallah, E. A. (1974). Biochem. J. 140, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergner, H., Münchow, H. & Wirthgen, B. (1969). Arch. Tierernährung 19, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergner, H. & Simon, O. (1976). Arch. Tierernährung 26, 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergner, H., Simon, O., Münchmeyer, R. & Seidel, Ch. (1981). Arch. Anim. Nutr. 31, 109.Google Scholar
Bohley, P., Simon, O., Bergner, H. & Münchmeyer, R. (1979). Arch. Tierernährung 29, 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. M. (1966). Endocrinology 78, 1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttery, P. J. (1980). Proc. 3rd Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. Symp. Protein Metab. Nutr., p. 31. EAAP Publication no. 27.Google Scholar
Carter, W. J., Faas, F. H. & Wynn, J. (1971). J. biol. Chem. 246, 4973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corring, T. (1975). Annls biol. Anim. Biochim. Biophys. 15, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmunds, B. K. & Buttery, P. J. (1978). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 37, 32A.Google Scholar
Garlick, P. J., Burk, J. L. & Swick, R. W. (1976). Am. J. Physiol. 230, 1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlick, P. J., Clugston, G. A. & Waterlow, J. C. (1980). Am. J. Physiol. 238E, 235.Google Scholar
Garlick, P. J., Millward, D. J. & James, W. P. T. (1973). Biochem. J. 136, 935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Ben-Porath, E., Doller, H. & Segen, N. B. J. (1977). Proc. 11th FEBS Meeting, Abstr. B 3-4 L 1–7.Google Scholar
Golden, H. N. & Waterlow, J. C. (1977). Clin. Sci. Mol. Med. 53, 277.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, L., Jentsch, W., Klein, M. & Schiemann, R. (1977). Arch. Tierernährung 27, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, K. (1977). Triiodothyronin-Bestimmung und pathologische Bedeutung, Berlin: Urban and Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. L. & Evans, S. E. (1980). Br. J. Nutr. 43, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khairallah, E. A., Airhart, J., Bruno, M. K., Puchalsky, D. & Khairallah, L. (1977). Acta bioch. med. germ. 36, 1735.Google Scholar
Lobley, G. E., Milne, V., Lovie, J. M., Reeds, P. J. & Pennie, K. (1980). Br. J. Nutr. 43, 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobley, G. E. & Reeds, P. J. (1980). Proc. 3rd Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. Symp. Protein Metab. Nutr., p. 80. EAAP Publication no. 27.Google Scholar
McNurlan, M. A. & Garlick, P. J. (1980). Biochem. J. 186, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNurlan, M. A., Tomkins, A. M. & Garlick, P. J. (1979). Biochem. J. 178, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, R., Cason, J. & Sokoloff, L. (1963). Science 140, 1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millward, D. J., Garlick, P. J., James, W. P. T., Sender, P. M. & Waterlow, J. C. (1975). Publ. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod., p. 49, no. 16.Google Scholar
Millward, D. J., Holliday, M. A., Bates, P. C., Cox, M. & Heard, C. R. C. (1979). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 38, 33A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, H. L. & Kirchgessner, M. (1979). Z. Tierphysiol., Tierernährung Futtermittelkunde 42, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münchmeyer, R., Simon, O., Bergner, H., Huth, R. & Wirthgen, B. (1974). Arch. Tierernährung 24, 193.Google Scholar
Münchow, H. & Bergner, H. (1970). Arch. Tierernährung 20, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, H. N. (1972). In Protein and Amino Acid Functions, p. 172 [Bigwood, E. J. editor]. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, G. A., Lobley, G. E. & Harris, C. I. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 38, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, D. G., Hays, T. & Heshman, J. M. (1970). J. clin. Endocr. 30, 798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeds, P. J., Cadenhead, A., Fuller, F., Lobley, G. E. & McDonald, J. D. (1980). Br. J. Nutr. 43, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeds, P. J. & Lobley, G. E. (1980). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 39, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, J. V., Schleinitz, M., Langenau, E. & Zimmermann, C. (1933). Arbeiten der Deutschen Gesellschaft Für Züchtungskunde. Berlin: M. and H. Scharper.Google Scholar
Simon, O., Bergner, H. & Adam, K. (1978). Arch. Tierernährung 28, 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, O., Münchmeyer, R., Bergner, H., Zebrowska, T. & Buraczewska, L. (1978). Br. J. Nutr. 40, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, L. & Kaufmann, S. (1959). Science 129, 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, L., Kaufmann, S., Campbell, P. L., Francis, C. M. & Gelboin, H. V. (1963). J. biol. Chem. 238, 1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, L., Roberts, P. A., Januska, M. M. & Kline, J. E. (1968). Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. USA 60, 652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorbek, G. (1980). Arch. Tierernährung 30, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterlow, J. C., Garlick, P. J. & Millward, D. J. (1978). Protein Turnover in Mammalian Tissues and in the Whole Body, pp. 366 and 469. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Weiss, W. P. & Sokoloff, L. (1963). Science 140, 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesemüller, W., Knobloch, F. & Poppe, S. (1975). In Tierernährung und Fütterung, vol. 9, p. 139 [Hennig, A. and Kielanowski, J., editors]. Berlin: VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftverlag.Google Scholar