Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:51:59.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nitrogen digestion and metabolism in sheep consuming diets containing contrasting forms and levels of N

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. C. Siddons ,
J. V. Nolan ,
D. E. Beever  and
J. C. Macrae
R. C. Siddons
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
J. V. Nolan
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
D. E. Beever
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
J. C. Macrae
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Nitrogen kinetics were studied in six sheep (45–55 kg live weight) consuming either a high-N grass silage or a low-N dried grass made from swards of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). The diets were fed hourly at a level of 600 g dry matter/d and supplied 19.5 and 11.0 g N/d respectively.

2. The amounts of organic matter (OM) consumed and flowing at the duodenum and ileum and excreted in the faeces were similar (P < 0.05) with both diets. Each diet supplied 23 g digestible OM/d per kg live eight0.75, which was sufficient to maintain body-weight.

3. There were no differences (P < 0.05) between diets in rumen fluid volume, fractional outflow rate of fluid from the rumen, total concentration of volatile fatty acids or molar proportion of acetate in the rumen. The pH and molar proportion of propionate in rumen fluid were higher (P < 0.01), and molar proportion of butyrate lower (P < 0.001) when the silage was given.

4. There was a net loss of N (4.0 g/d) between mouth and duodenum when the silage was consumed but a net gain (5.5 g/d) when the dried grass was consumed. As a result, total non-ammonia-N (NAN) flow at the duodenum did not differ (P / 0.05) between diets. Rumen microbial NAN flow at the duodenum, based on 15N as the marker, also did not differ (P < 0.05) between diets but the efficiency of microbial N synthesis in the rumen (g/kg OM apparently digested) was higher (P < 0.05) with the dried grass.

5. When the sheep were consuming silage they had a higher concentration of ammonia in rumen fluid (P < 0.01), a higher rate of irreversible loss of ammonia from the rumen (P < 0.05) and a higher rate of absorption of ammonia across the rumen wall (P < 0.01). The rate of absorption was found to be more closely related to the unionized ammonia concentration in rumen fluid (r2 0.85) than to the total ammonia concentration (r2 0.36).

6. Endogenous N entry into the forestomachs was calculated to be 5.5 g/d when the silage was given and 9.4 g/d when the dried grass was given, of which 1.7 and 3.5 g/d respectively were in the form of urea. Thus, approximately 4–6 g N/d were derived from non-urea materials.

7. Within the small intestine the apparent absorption coefficient of rumen microbial NAN (0.72) did not differ (P < 0.05) between diets but the apparent absorption coefficient of total NAN was lower (P < 0.05) when the I silage was given, owing to a lower (P < 0.01) absorption coefficient of the non-microbial NAN fraction (undegraded feed and endogenous).

8. Within the large intestine, diet had no effect (P < 0 05) on the apparent absorption coefficients of total N (0.22) and rumen microbial NAN (0.63).

9. Plasma urea concentration, the rate of urea synthesis in the body and urinary urea excretion were higher (P < 0.001) when the silage was consumed. However, the transfer of urea to the whole digestive tract and to the post-ruminal part of the tract did not differ (P < 0.05) between diets; urea transfer to the rumen was higher (P < 0.01) when the dried grass was given.

10. The results were used to construct a whole-animal model of N flows between the digestive tract and the tissues.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , July 1985 , pp. 175 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

Agricultural research council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E. (1980). Occasional Symposium 11, British Grassland Society, pp. 131–143.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Kellaway, R. C., Thomson, D. J., MacRae, J. C., Evans, C. C. & Wallace, A. S. (1978). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, P. R. (1972). Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 25, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. & Milligan, L. P. (1984). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. & Nolan, J. V. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 47, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. & Nolan, J. V. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 757–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, V. W. & Hauffe, R. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 216–230. [McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 277–291 [McDonald, and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Harrop, C. J. F. (1974). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J. P. (1961). Australian Journal of Biological Science 14, 448–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J. P. & Weston, R. H. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 474–485 [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Judson, G. J., Abdelsamie, R. & Bird, R. B. (1975). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 743–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempton, T. J., Nolan, J. V. & Leng, R. A. (1979). British Journal of Nutrition 42, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. & Milligan, L. P. (1980). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D., Hill, K. J. & Annison, E. F. (1957). Biochemical Journal 66, 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, J. C. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 261–276 [McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 416–431 [McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V. & Leng, R. A. (1972). British Journal of Nutrition 27, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, J. V. & Leng, R. A. (1974). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 33, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, J. V., Norton, B. W. & Leng, R. A. (1976). British Journal of Nutrition 35, 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, J. V. & Stachiw, S. (1979). British Journal of Nutrition 42, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. W., Janes, A. N. & Armstrong, D. G. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 48, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, D. N. & Smith, R. H. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 38, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satter, L. D. & Slyter, L. L. (1974). British Journal of Nutrition 32, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddons, R. C., Beever, D. E. & Kaiser, A. G. (1982a). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33, 609–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddons, R. C., Beever, D. E. & Nolan, J. V. (1982b). British Journal of Nutrition 48, 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Storm, E., Brown, D. S. & Ørskov, E. R. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P. C., Chamberlain, D. G., Kelly, N. C. & Wait, M. K. (1980). British Journal of Nutrition 43, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visek, W. J. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science 51, 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, A. C. I. & Stacy, D. B. (1968). British Journal of Nutrition 22, 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar