Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T13:03:46.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of dietary glycerol on the serum glyceride level of men and women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

I. MacDonald
I. MacDonald
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Guy's Hospital Medical School, London, SE 1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The serum glycerides of men were raised 1–2.5 h after the ingestion of glycerol, whereas in young women given glycerol the serum glycerides were not raised. In men who had a supplementation of glycerol to their free-choice diet there was a rise in the concentration of fasting serum glycerides, a rise that was not found when a similar supplementation was given to young women.

2. These findings would support the tentative suggestion that dietary fructose does not follow the Emden-Meyerhof pathway to the same extent as glucose. The increased serum glyceride levels reported after high-fructose diets may be due to an increased availability of the glycerol moiety of glycerides.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 537 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1970

References

Antar, M. A. & Ohlson, M. A. (1965). J. Nutr. 85, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-On, H. & Stein, Y. (1968). J. Nutr. 94, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, J. M. R., Jagannathan, S. N. & Connell, W. F. (1964). Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 42, 999.Google Scholar
Cahill, G. F. Jr., Leboeuf, B. & Renold, A. E. (1959). J. biol. Chem. 234, 2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, J. N. & MacDonald, I. (1970). Nutritio Dieta (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Galton, D. J. (1966). Br. med. J. ii, 1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, V. & Hers, H. G. (1960). Biochim. biophys. Acta 38, 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grande, F., Anderson, J. T. & Keys, A. (1965). J. Nutr. 86, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, F., Lamprecht, W. & Kirsch, J. (1968). J. clin. Invest. 47, 1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichihara, A. & Greenberg, D. M. (1957). J. biol. Chem. 225, 949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, N. A., Poznanski, R., Blondheim, S. H. & Stein, Y. (1966). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 18, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klugh, C. A. & Irwin, M. I. (1966). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 25, 672.Google Scholar
Kuo, P. T. & Bassett, D. R. (1965) Ann. intern. Med. 62, 1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupke, I. & Lamprecht, W. (1967). Hoppe-Seyler's Z. physiol. Chem. 348, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, A. R. (1950). J. Nutr. 41, 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamprecht, W. & Heinz, F. (1958). Z. Naturf. 13B, 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynen, F. (1967). Biochem. J. 102, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, I. (1966). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 18, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, I. (1968). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 21, 1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, I. & Braithwaite, D. M. (1964). Clin. Sci. 27, 23.Google Scholar
McGandy, R. B., Hegsted, D. M., Myers, M. L. & Stare, F. J. (1966). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 18, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikkilä, E. A. (1966). Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. Suppl. 92, p. 1.Google Scholar
Salomon, L. L. & Johnson, J. E. (1959). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 82, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzur, R., Tal, E. & Shapiro, B. (1964). Biochim. biophys. Acta 84, 18.Google Scholar
Vaughan, M. (1961). J. biol. Chem. 236, 2196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. W. & Landau, B. R. (1965). J. clin. Invest. 44, 1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakim, D. & Herman, R. H. (1968). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 21 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakim, D., Pardini, R. S., Herman, R. H. & Sauberlich, H. E. (1967).Biochim. biophys. Acta 14, 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar