Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T01:33:17.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digestion of polysaccharides and other major components in the small and large intestine of pigs fed on diets consisting of oat fractions rich in β-D-glucan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Knud Erik Bach Knudsen ,
Bent Borg Jensen  and
Inge Hansen
Knud Erik Bach Knudsen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animul Science, Department of Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, Fouhim, PO Box 39, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
Bent Borg Jensen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animul Science, Department of Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, Fouhim, PO Box 39, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
Inge Hansen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animul Science, Department of Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, Fouhim, PO Box 39, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The digestibility of polysaccharides and other major components and the metabolic response of the microflora in the small and large intestines to oat diets varying in mixed linked (β(l →3; 1 →4)-D-glucan β-glucan) were studied in experiments with ileum-cannulated pigs. The oat fractions for diets were prepared in a dry milling process in which oat groats were milled into two endosperm fractions (oat flour 1 and oat flour 2) and oat bran. The digestibility of polysaccharides and the metabolic response of the microflora were followed for the two contrasting diets, oat flour 1 and oat bran, from ingestion to excretion while the digestibility of oat groats and oat flour 2 were estimated only at the ileum and in faeces. There was no degradation of β-glucan from either oat flour 1 or bran in the stomach and the first, middle and distal thirds of the small intestine (average digestibility approximately 0), while in the terminal ileum digestibility increased to 0·30 to 0·17 respectively. The digestion of starch in the first third of the small intestine was lower for the high-β-glucan oat-bran diet (0·49) than for the low-β-glucan flour diet (0·64). However, digestibility differences between the two diets levelled out as the digesta moved aborally in the small intestine and the digestibility at the terminal ileum was almost complete (0·970–0·995) for all diets. Oat non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) were an easily digestible energy source for the microflora in the large intestine less than 13% of dietary NSP being recovered in faeces. The bulk of β-glucan which survived the small intestine was degraded in the caecum and proximal colon while arabinoxylan was more slowly degraded. The amount of residues passing the ileo-caecal junction has little impact on the density of micro-organisms in the large intestine, which on the flour and bran diets were in the range of 1010–1011 viable counts/g digesta, but a high impact on the activity of the flora in colon. Oat bran resulted in a higher proportion of butyric acid in large intestinal content compared with the flour diet. The faecal bulking effect of oat bran was mainly caused by an increased excretion of protein and fat, presumably of bacterial origin. Of all the diets tested the oat-bran diets had the lowest digestibilities of protein and fat at the terminal ileum and in the faeces.

Keywords

β-GlucanNon-starch polysaccharidesDigestibilityPig
Type
Gastro-Intestinal Effects of Diets Containing Complex Caebohydrates
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , September 1993 , pp. 537 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1993

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. W. (1990). Hypocholesterolemic effects of oat products. In New Developments in Dietary Fiber: Physiological, Physicochemical and Analytic Aspects, pp. 17–36 [Furda, I. and Brine, C. J., editors]. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (1989). AACC committee adopts oat bran definition. Cereal Food World 34, 1033–1034.Google Scholar
Argenzio, R. A. & Whipp, S. C. (1979). Inter-relationship of sodium, chloride, bicarbonate and acetate transport by the colon of the pig. Journal of Physiology 195, 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1975). Official Methods of Analysis, 11th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, K. E., Åman, P. & Eggum, B. O. (1987). Nutritive value of Danish-grown barley varieties, I, Carbohydrates and other major constituents. Journal of Cereal Science 6, 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach Knudsen, K. E. & Eggum, B. O. (1984). The nutritive value of botanically defined mill fractions of barley. 3. The protein and energy value of pericarp, Testa, germ, aleuron, and endosperm reic decortication fractions of the variety Bomi. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 51, 130–148.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, K. E. & Hansen, I. (1991). Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions. 1. Digestibility and bulking properties of polysaccharides and other major constituents. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach Knudsen, K. E., Hansen, I., Jensen, B. B. & sstergbrd, K. (1990). Physiological implications of wheat and oat dietary fiber. In New Developments in Dietary Fiber: Physiological, Physiochemical, and Analaytical Aspects pp. 135–150 [Furda, I. and Brine, C. J., editors]. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach Knudsen, K. E., Jensen, B., Anderson, J. O. & Hansen, I. (1991). Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions. 2. Microbial activity in the gastrointestinal tract. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach Knudsen, K. E. & Li, B. (1991). Determination of oligosaccharides in protein-rich feedstuffs by gas-liquid chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 39, 689–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, W. J. L. & Anderson, J. W. (1986). Hypocholesterolemic effects of soluble fibers. In Dietary Fibre: Basic and Clinical Aspects, pp. 275–285 [Vahouny, G. V. and Kritchevsky, D., editors]. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englyst, H. N., Wiggins, H. S. & Cummings, J. H. (1982). Determination of non-starch polysaccharides in plant foods by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. Analyst 107, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fadel, J. G., Newman, C. W., Newman, R. K. & Graham, H. (1988). Effects of extrusion cooking of barley on ileal and faecal digestibilities of dietary components in pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 68, 891–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fadel, J. G., Newman, R. K., Newman, C. W. & Graham, H. (1989). Effects of baking hulless barley on the digestibility of dietary components as measured at the ileum and in feces in pigs. Journal of Nutrition 119, 722–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, H., Hesselman, K. & Aman, P. (1986 a). The influence of wheat bran and sugar-beet pulp on the digestibility of dietary components in a cerepl-based pig diet. Journal of Nutrition 116, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, H., Hesselman, K., Jonsson, E. & Aman, P. (1986 b). Influence of P-glucanase supplementation on digestion of a barley-based diet in the pig gastrointestinal tract. Nutrition Reports International 34, 1089–1096.Google Scholar
Hansen, I., Larsen, T., Bach Knudsen, K. E. & Eggum, B. O. (1991). Nutrient digestibilities in ingredients fed alone or in combinations. British Journal of Nutrition 66, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, D. J. A., Jenkins, A. L., Wolever, T. M., Collier, G. R., Rao, A. V. & Thompson, L. U. (1987). Starchy foods and fibre: reduced rate of digestion and improved carbohydrate metabolism. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 22, 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, A. (1975). Feed evaluation in pigs. World Review of Animal Production ii, 18–30.Google Scholar
Kirby, R. W., Anderson, J. W., Sieling, B., Rees, E. D., Chen, W. J. L., Miller, R. E. & Kay, R. M. (1981). Oat-bran intake selectively lowers serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations of hypercholesterolemic men. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34, 824–829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowalski, R. E. (1987). The 8-Week Cholesterol Cure. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.Google Scholar
Larsson, K. & Bengtsson, S. (1983). Bestämming av lättilgängeliga kolhydrater i växtmaterial (Determination of readily available carbohydrates in plant material). National Laboratory of Agricultural Chemistry Methods Report no. 22. Uppsala: National Laboratory of Agricultural Chemistry.Google Scholar
McCleary, B. V. & Glennie-Holmes, M. (1985). Enzymic quantification of (1–3), (1–4)-β-D-glucan in barley and malt. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 91, 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, G. T., Cummings, J. H. & Allison, C. (1986). Protein degradation by human intestinal bacteria. Journal of General Microbiology 132, 1647–1656.Google ScholarPubMed
Mathers, J. C. (1991). Digestion of non-starch polysaccharides by non-ruminant omnivores. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 50, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, T. L. & Wolin, M. J. (1974). A serum bottle modification of the Hungate technique for cultivating obligate anaerobes. Applied Microbiology 27, 985–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, T. L. & Wolin, M. J. (1979). Fermentation by saccharolytic intestinal bacteria. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyman, M. & Asp, N.-G. (1982). Fermentation of dietary fibre components in the rat intestinal tract. British Journal of Nutrition 47, 357–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyman, M. & Asp, N.-G. (1988). Fermentation of oat fiber in the rat intestinal tract: a study of different cellular areas. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 48, 274–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salyers, A. A. & Leedle, J. A. Z. (1983). Carbohydrate metabolism in the human colon. In Human Intestinal Microfora in Health and Disease, pp. 129–146 [Hedges, D. J., editor]. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schürch, A. F., Lloyd, L. E. & Crampton, E. W. (1950). The use of chromic oxide as an index for determining the digestibility of a diet. Journal of Nutrition 50, 628–636.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1973). Statistical Methods. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Stoldt, W. (1952). Vorschlag zur Vereinheitlichung der Fettbestimmung in Lebensmitteln (Suggestion to standardize the determination of fat in food stuffs). Fette, Seifen, Anstrichmittel 54, 206–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theander, O. & Åman, P. (1979). Studies on dietary fibre. 1. Analysis and chemical characterization of water-soluble and water-insoluble dietary fibres. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 97–106.Google Scholar
Theander, O. & Westerlund, E. A. (1986). Studies on dietary fiber. 3. Improved procedures for analysis of dietary fiber. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 34, 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, P. J. (1986). Oat β-glucan: Structure, location, and properties. In Oats: Chemistry and Technology, pp. 121–152 [Webster, F. H., editor]. St Paul: American Association of Cereal Chemists.Google Scholar
Wood, P. J., Weisz, J., Fedec, P. & Burrows, V. D. (1989). Large-scale preparation and properties of oat fractions enriched in (1 → 3)(1 → 4)-β-D-ghcan. Cereal Chemistry 66, 97–103.Google Scholar
Yiu, S. H., Wood, P. J. & Weisz, J. (1987). Effects of cooking on starch and β-glucan of rolled oats. Cereal Chemistry 64, 313–319.Google Scholar