Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T12:41:08.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dietary supplementation increases milk output in the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2008

Susan B. Roberts  and
W. A. Coward
Susan B. Roberts
Affiliation:
Dunn Nutritional Laboratory, Downham's Lane, Milton Road, CambridgeCB4 IXJ
W. A. Coward
Affiliation:
Dunn Nutritional Laboratory, Downham's Lane, Milton Road, CambridgeCB4 IXJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The effects of dietary supplementation on milk output and maternal body composition were investigated in the lactating rat. The supplement was a cooked homogeneous mixture of eggs and maize oil, and had the same protein-energy: total energy value as the control diet.

2. During 2–12 d post partum rats were fed ad lib., either on the control diet alone or on the control diet plus the supplement. Measurements were made of milk output using an isotope-dilution technique, milk composition, and dam and litter body-composition changes.

3. Compared with the dams receiving only the control diet, dams provided with the supplement consumed 19.7% more energy and protein and produced 31.2% more milk and mobilized less body fat.

4. By 12 d of age, pups in litters of dams receiving the supplement were significantly heavier than those in litters of dams receiving the control diet only, and they contained more protein and more fat.

5. It is concluded that dietary supplementation of lactating rats can enhance lactational performance.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

REFERENCES

Baverstock, P. & Green, B. (1975). Science 187, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, K. E., Ziegler, E. E. & Fomon, S. J. (1974). In Infant nutrition pp. 245–266 [Fomon, S. J., editor]. London and Toronto: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Chavez, M., Martinez, C. & Bourges, H. (1975). Ecology of food and nutrition 4, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coward, W. A., Cole, T. J., Gerber, H., Roberts, S. B. & Fleet, I. (1982). European Journal of Physiology 383, 344–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cripps, A. W. & Williams, V. J. (1975). British Journal of Nutrition 33, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godbole, V. Y., Grundleger, M. L., Pasquine, T. A. & Thenen, S. W. (1981). Journal of Nutrition 111, 480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalan, C. (1958). Journal of Tropical Paediatrics 4, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, M. & Stanier, J. E. (1951). Medical Research Council Special Report Series 275, 379–400.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. J., Gerber, H. & John, P. M. V. (1979). Journal of Human Nutrition 33, 283–287.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. J., John, P. M. V., Bailey, B. S. & Southgate, D. A. T. (1976). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27, 681–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kametaka, M., Inaba, J. & Ichikawa, R. (1974). Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology 20, 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G. C. (1957). Journal of Endocrinology 16, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linzell, J. L. (1967). Journal of Physiology 190, 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunn, P. G., Whitehead, R. G. & Baker, B. A. (1976). British Journal of Nutrition 36, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, C. & Chavez, A. (1971). Nutrition Reports International 4, 139–149.Google Scholar
Menaker, L. & Navia, J. M. C. (1973). Journal of Nutrition 103, 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, A. J. & Cox, W. M. Jr (1946). Journal of Nutrition 31, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naismith, D. J., Richardson, D. P. & Pritchard, A. E. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 48, 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ota, K. & Yokoyama, A. (1967). Journal of Endocrinology 38, 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, A. M. (1980). In Maternal Nutrition During Pregnancy and Lactation, pp. 167–183 [Aebi, H. and Whitehead, R. G., editors]. Berne: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
Prentice, A. M., Whitehead, R. G., Roberts, S. B., Paul, A. A., Watkinson, M., Prentice, A. & Watkinson, A. A. (1980). Lancet ii, 866–888.Google Scholar
Rolls, B. A., Barley, J. B. & Gurr, M. I. (1983). Proceedings of the nutrition society 42, 83A.Google Scholar
Rolls, B. A., Edwards-webb, J. D., Gurr, M. I., Rolls, B. J. & Rowe, E. A. (1981). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 40, 60A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolls, B. J. & Rowe, E. A. (1982). Physiology and Behaviour 28. 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolls, B. J., Rowe, E. A., Fahrbach, S., Agius, L. & Williamson, D. H. (1980). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 39, 51A.Google Scholar
Spray, C. M. (1950). Bririth Journal of Nurtition 4, 354–360.Google Scholar
Steingrimsdottir, L., Greenwood, M. R. C. & Brasel, J. A. (1980). Journal of nutrition 110, 600–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Steenbergen, W. L., Kusin, J. A. & Van Rens, M. M. (1981). Journal of Tropical Paediatrics 27, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatachalam, P. S. & Ramanathan, K. S. (1964). Journal of Nutrition 84, 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, R. (1973). Technicon Report. Geneva, Switzerland: Technicon International Division.Google Scholar
Whitehead, R. G., Prentice, A. M., Lamb, W. H. & Paul, A. A. (1983). In Nutrition in Pregnancy. Proceedings of the 10th study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, pp. 133–143 [Campbell, D. M. and Gillmar, D. G., editors]. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Google Scholar
Woodward, C. J. H. (1978). Studies on metabolic efficiency in genetically obese (ob/ob) mice. phD Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar