Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T15:54:29.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in the concentration of specific amino acids in the serum of experimentally malnourished pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. F. Grimble  and
R. G. Whitehead
R. F. Grimble
Affiliation:
MRC Child Nutrition Research Unit, PO Box 7051, Kampala, Uganda
R. G. Whitehead
Affiliation:
MRC Child Nutrition Research Unit, PO Box 7051, Kampala, Uganda
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The concentrations of individual free serum amino acids have been studied during the course of chronic protein malnutrition in experimentally malnourished pigs.

2. Until growth was markedly impaired, reducing the protein content of the diet had no significant effect on serum amino acid composition.

3. During the period when growth had practically ceased but kcal intake per kg body-weight was normal the concentrations of valine, leucine, isoleucine, threonine and eventually tyrosine fell, the levels of alanine and serine were above control levels and aspartic acid, glycine, methionine, phenylalanine, proline, arginine, histidine and lysine remained unaltered.

4. When the kcal intake per kg fell below control levels, owing to anorexia, and the animals began to lose weight, the levels of alanine, glycine, serine and methionine fell and valine, leucine, isoleucine, threonine and tyrosine remained well below control levels.

5. The physiological, nutritional and metabolic significance of these findings is considered. The changes in alanine and glycine concentration are discussed in terms of the regulation of gluconeogenesis. The reduction of the branched-chain amino acids is interpreted on the basis of their availability for synthetic and catabolic needs.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 557 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1970

References

Arroyave, G. (1962). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 11, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, R. F. A. & Whitehead, R. G. (1963). Lancet i, 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felig, P., Owen, O. E., Wahren, J. & Cahill, G. F. Jr (1969).J. clin. Invest. 48, 584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimble, R. F. & Whitehead, R. G. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, L. E. Jr, Snyderman, S. E., Norton, P. M., Roitman, E. & Finch, J. (1963). Lancet ii, 1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, D. S., Kamel, W. W. & Ayyoub, N. (1965). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 17, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mimura, T., Yamada, C. & Swendseid, M. E. (1968). J. Nutr. 95, 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, O. E., Morgan, A. P., Kemp, H. G., Sullivan, J. M., Herrera, M. G. & Cahill, G. F. Jr. (1967). J. clin. Invest. 46, 1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swendseid, M. E., Tuttle, S. G., Figueroa, W. S., Mulcare, D., Clark, A. J. & Massey, F. J. (1966). J. Nutr. 88, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truswell, A. S., Wannenburg, P., Wittmann, W. & Hansen, J. D. L. (1966). Lancet i, 1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, R. G. (1964 a). Lancet i, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, R. G. (1964 b). Nature, Lond. 204, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, V. R. & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar