Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:45:09.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anthropometric values in an elderly French population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Jacques Delarue ,
Thierry Constans ,
Denis Malvy ,
Alain Pradignac ,
Charles Couet  and
Fernand Lamisse
Jacques Delarue
Affiliation:
Clinique Medicale A et Lahorutoire de Nutrition
Thierry Constans
Affiliation:
Hôpital cle l'Ermitage et Club Francophone Gêriatrie et Nutrition
Denis Malvy
Affiliation:
Service d'Information Médicale et d'Hygiéne 37044 - Tours Cedex, France
Alain Pradignac
Affiliation:
Servicie de Nutrition-Endocrinologie-Médecine Interne, Hôpital Hautepierre 67200 - Strasbourg, France
Charles Couet
Affiliation:
Clinique Medicale A et Lahorutoire de Nutrition
Fernand Lamisse
Affiliation:
Clinique Medicale A et Lahorutoire de Nutrition
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We compared anthropometric indices in samples of elderly people aged 65 years and over living in two French areas. The samples were divided into four age-groups (65–69, 70–74, 75–79 and over 80 years). We observed interregional differences in women aged 65–69 years and in men aged 65–74 years. Weight and anthropometric variables related to body fat percentage and to muscle mass showed a decline with age as already reported by others. We established anthropometric percentile values according to sex in pooled subjects when no integrated difference was found. The 50th percentile of arm circumference, muscle arm circumference and triceps skinfold was higher, and the 50th percentile of body mass index was lower than the one reported for the same indices from an elderly Welsh population. Our results show that an interregional difference in anthropometric indices exists in the elderly. The differences which are observed between our results and those reported from a British population emphasize the importance of establishing local values for the elderly population.

Keywords

AnthropometryElderlyNutrition
Type
Anthropometric Studies in the Elderly
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , February 1994 , pp. 295 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1994

References

REFERENCES

Burr, M. L. & Phillips, K. M. (1984). Anthropometric norms in the elderly. British Journal of Nutrtion 51, 165–169.Google Scholar
Chumlea, W. C. & Baumgartner, R. N. (1989). Status of anthropometry and body composition data in elderly subjects. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 50, 1158–1166.Google Scholar
Chumlea, W. C., Roche, A. F. & Webb, P. (1984). Body size, subcutaneous fatness and total body fat in older adults. International Journal of Obesity 8, 313–311.Google Scholar
Constans, T., Bacq, Y., Bertrand, P., Beaugerie, A., Babault, C., Delarue, J. & Lamisse, F. (1990). The American Anthropometric Norms are not suitable to assess the nutritional status of a French population. Clinical Nutrition 9, 168–171.Google Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Womersley, J. (1974). Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness. Measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 11–91.Google Scholar
Frisancho, A. R. (1981). New norms of upper limb fat and muscle areas for assessment of nutritional status. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34, 2540–2545.Google Scholar
Heymsfield, S. B., MacManus, C., Smith, J., Stevens, V. & Nixon, D. W. (1982). Anthropometric measurement of muscle mass: revised equations for calculating bone free arm muscle area. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 36, 680–690.Google Scholar
Kemm, J. R. & Allcock, J. (1984). The distribution of supposed indicators of nutritional status in elderly patients. Age and Ageing 13, 21–28.Google Scholar
Lehmann, A. B. (1989). Undernutrition in elderly people. Age, and Ageing 18, 339–353.Google Scholar
McEvoy, A. W. & James, O. F. W. (1982). Anthropometric indices in normal elderly subjects. Age and Ageing 11, 97–100.Google Scholar
Raisz, L. G. (1988). Local and systemic factors in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. New England Journal of Medicine 318, 818–828.Google Scholar
Side, X., Mingtang, S., Shuquan, Z., Zhaomei, M., Yinzhi, X., Yuhun, L., Jun, W. & Kui, J. (1991). Anthropometric and dietary survey of elderly Chinese. British Journal of Nutrition 66, 355–362.Google Scholar
Siri, W. E. (1961). Body composition from fluid spaces and density, analysis of methods. In Techniques for Measuring Body Composition, pp. 223–244 [Brozek, J. and Henschel, A., editors], Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Solberg, H. E. (1981). Statistical treatment of collected reference values and determination of reference limits. In Reference Values in Laboratory Medicine, pp. 193–201. [Grasbek, R. and Alstrom, T., editors]. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. M. & Whitehouse, R. H. (1962). Standard for subcutaneous fat in British children. British Medical Journal 1. 446–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vir, S. C. & Love, A. H. G. (1980). Anthropometric measurements in the elderly. Gerontology 26, 1–8.Google Scholar