Skip to main content Accessibility help

The role of dynamic contrasts in the L2 acquisition of Spanish past tense morphology*



This study examines the second language acquisition of Spanish past tense morphology by three groups of English speakers (beginners, intermediates and advanced). We adopt a novel methodological approach – combining oral corpus data with controlled experimental data – in order to provide new evidence on the validity of the Lexical Aspect Hypothesis (LAH) in L2 Spanish. Data elicited through one comprehension and three oral tasks with varying degrees of experimental control show that the emergence of temporal markings is determined mainly by the dynamic/non-dynamic contrast (whether a verb is a state or an event) as beginner and intermediate speakers use Preterit with event verbs but Imperfect mainly with state verbs. One crucial finding is that although advanced learners use typical Preterit–telic associations in the least controlled oral tasks, as predicted by the LAH, this pattern is often reversed in tasks designed to include non-prototypical (and infrequent) form–meaning contexts. The results of the comprehension task also show that the Preterit-event and Imperfect-state associations observed in the production data determine the interpretation that learners assign to the Preterit and the Imperfect as well. These results show that beginner and intermediate learners treat event verbs (achievements, accomplishments and activities) in Spanish as a single class that they associate with Preterit morphology. We argue that dynamicity contrasts, and not telicity, affect learners’ use of past tense forms during early stages of acquisition.


Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Laura Domínguez, University of Southampton, Modern Languages, Southampton SO17 1BJ,


Hide All

This study has been supported by the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) research grant RES-062–23-1075 and is part of the Spanish Learner Language Oral Corpora (SPLLOC) project. We would like to thank all the people involved in the project including fieldworkers and transcribers, and in particular schools and colleges in the UK and Spain which kindly agreed to participate in the study. We are also grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions for improvement.



Hide All
Andersen, R. (1986). El desarrollo de la morfología verbal en el español como segundo idioma. In Meisel, J. M. (ed.), Adquisición de lenguaje/Aquisição da linguagem, pp. 115138. Frankfurt: Vervuert.
Andersen, R. (1989). The acquisition of verbal morphology. Linguistica, 1, 89141. [Los Angeles: University of California.]
Andersen, R. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In Huebner, T. & Ferguson, C. (eds.), Crosscurrents in SLA and linguistic theories, pp. 305324. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Andersen, R. (1993). Four operating principles and input distributions as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In Hyltenstam, K. & Virborg, A. (eds.), Progression and regression in language, pp. 309339. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Andersen, R., & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 133156.
Antti, A., & Järvikivi, J. (2007). Every method counts: Combining corpus-based and experimental evidence in the study of synonymy. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 3 (2), 131159.
Arche, M. J. (2006). Individuals in time: Tense, aspect and the individual/stage distinction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Armstrong, S. (ed.) (1994). Using large corpora. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Press.
Bard, E., Robertson, B., & Sorace, A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72, 3268.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The telling of a tale: Discourse structure and tense use in learners’ narratives. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 3, 144161.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994). Anecdote or evidence? Evaluating support for hypotheses concerning the development of tense and aspect. In Gass, S., Cohen, A. & Tarone, E. (eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition, pp. 4160. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1995). A narrative perspective on the development of the tense/aspect system in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17 (2), 263291.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1998). Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 471508.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2005). Tracking the elusive Imperfect in adult second language acquisition: Refining the hunt. In Kempchinsky, P. & Slabakova, R. (eds.), Aspectual inquiries, pp. 397419. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bergström, A. (1995). The expression of past temporal reference by English-speaking learners of French. Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
Bergström, A. (1997). L'influence des distinctions aspectuelles sur l'acquisition des temps en français langue étrangère. In Bartning, I. (ed.), Special Issue of Acquisition et interaction en langue etrangere (AILE), 9, 5182.
Bickerton, D. (1981), Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.
Boogaart, R. (1999). Aspect and temporal ordering: A contrastive analysis of Dutch and English. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
Brinton, L. (1988). The development of English aspectual systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Cadierno, T. (2000). The acquisition of Spanish grammatical aspect by Danish advanced language learners. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 4, 153.
Camps, J. (2002). Aspectual distinctions in Spanish as a foreign language: The early stages of oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40, 179210.
Camps, J. (2005). The emergence of the Imperfect in Spanish as a foreign language: The association between imperfective morphology and state verbs. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 163192.
Collins, L. (2002). The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning, 52, 4394.
Comajoan, L. (2001). The acquisition of Catalan L2 past morphology: Evidence for the aspect and discourse hypotheses. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Comajoan, L. (2005). The early L2 acquisition of past morphology: Perfective morphology as a default marker or aspectual marker? In Eddington, D. (ed.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages, pp. 3143. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Comajoan, L. (2006). The aspect hypothesis: Development of morphology and appropriateness of use. Language Learning, 56, 201268.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Depraertere, I. (1995). On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 119.
Domínguez, L., Arche, M. J., & Myles, F. (2011). Testing the predictions of the Feature- Assembly Hypothesis: Evidence from the L2 acquisition of Spanish aspect morphology. In Danis, N., Mesh, K. & Sung, H. (eds). Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 183196. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Dowty, D. R. (1986). The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics? Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 3761.
Dry, H. A. (1992). Foregrounding: An assessment. In Hwang, S. J. J. & Merrifield, W. R. (eds.), Language in context: Essays for Robert E. Longacre, pp. 435450. Arlington, TX: The Summer Institute of Linguistics & the University of Texas at Arlington.
Duffield, N., & White, L. (1999). Assessing L2 knowledge of Spanish clitic placement: Converging methodologies. Second Language Research, 15 (2), 133160.
Featherston, S. (2007). Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics, 33 (3), 269318.
Fillmore, C. J. (1992). ‘Corpus linguistics’ vs. ‘Computer-aided armchair linguistics’: Directions in corpus linguistics. Proceedings from a 1991 Nobel Symposium on Corpus Linguistics, pp. 3566. Stockholm: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fleischman, S. (1990). Tense and narrativity: From medieval performance to modern fiction. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Giacalone-Ramat, A. (2002). How do learners acquire the classical three categories of temporality? Evidence from L2 Italian. In Salaberry, & Shirai, (eds.), pp. 221–247.
Gilquin, G., & Gries, St. Th. (2009). Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5 (1), 126.
Giorgi, A., & Pianesi, F. (1997). Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Givón, T. (1987). Beyond foreground and background. In Tomlin, R. S. (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, pp. 175188. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
González, P. (2003). Aspects on aspect: Theory and applications of grammatical aspect in Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Gries, St. Th., & Wulff, S. (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182200.
Gries, St. Th., & Wulff, S. (2009). Psycholinguistic and corpus linguistic evidence for L2 constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 163186.
Grinstead, J., Pratt, T., & McCurley, D. (2009). Comprehension of prototypical tense and aspect combinations in child Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 2 (2), 435450.
Hasbún, L. (1995). The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of the tense/aspect system in L2 Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Hodgson, M. (2006). Telicity and the syntax-semantics of the object and subject. Ph.D. dissertation., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Hoffmann, T. (2006). Corpora and introspection as corroborating evidence: The case of preposition placement in English relative clauses. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2 (2), 165195.
Housen, A. (1994). Tense and aspect in second language learning: The Dutch interlanguage of a native speaker of English. In Vet, C. & Vetters, C. (eds.), Tense and aspect in discourse, pp. 257291. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jackson-Maldonado, D., & Maldonado, R. (2001). Determinaciones semánticas de la flexión verbal en la adquisición temprana del español. In Rojas, C. & de León, L. (eds.), La adquisición de la lengua materna, Español, lenguas mayas y, euskera, pp. 165200. México: UNAM-CIESAS.
Kaplan, M. (1987). Developmental patterns of past tense acquisition among foreign learners of French. In VanPatten, B. (ed.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective, pp. 5260. Rowley MA: Newbury House.
Kempchinsky, P., & Gupton, T. (2009). The role of quantitative data collection in theoretical syntax. Presented at the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Universidad de Puerto Rico.
Kihlstedt, M. (2002). Reference to past events in dialogue: The acquisition of tense and aspect by advanced learners of French. In Salaberry, & Shirai, (eds.), pp. 323–362.
Kumpf, L. (1984). Temporal systems and universality in interlanguages: A case study. In Eckman, F., Bell, L. & Nelson, D. (eds.), Universals of second language acquisition, pp. 132143. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Lenertová, D., & Sudhoff, S. (2007). Corpus data and experimental results as prosodic evidence: On the case of stressed auch in German. In Featherston, S. & Sternefeld, W. (eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base, pp. 227247. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Liskin-Gasparro, J. (2000). The use of tense-aspect morphology in Spanish oral narratives: Exploring the perceptions of advanced learners. Hispania, 83, 830844.
López-Ortega, N. R. (2000). Tense, aspect, and narrative structure in Spanish as a second language. Hispania, 83, 488502.
Lubbers-Quesada, M. (2007). La percepción de las propiedades semánticas y la adquisición de la morfología verbal en el español como L2. In Buck, M. (ed.), Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada: La Adquisición del Aspecto en Español, 44, 1136.
McManus, K. (2011). The development of aspect in a second language: What role for the first language? Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.
Montrul, S., & Salaberry, R. (2003). The development of tense/aspect morphology in Spanish as a second language. In Lafford, B. A. & Salaberry, R. (eds.), Spanish second language acquisition, pp. 4773. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R. (2002). The L2 acquisition of morphosyntactic and semantic properties of the aspectual tenses Preterite and Imperfect. In Pérez-Leroux, A. T. & Muñoz Liceras, J. (eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax, pp. 115151. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25 (3), 351398.
Noyau, C. (1989). The development of means for temporality in the unguided acquisition of L2: Cross-linguistic perspectives. In Dechert, H. (ed.), Current trends in European second language acquisition research, pp. 143170. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Noyau, C. (2002). Temporal relations in learner varieties: Grammaticalisation and discourse construction. In Salaberry, & Shirai, (eds.), pp. 107–127.
Ramsay, V. (1990). Developmental stages in the acquisition of the perfective and the imperfective aspects by classroom L2 learners of Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon.
Reid, W. (1980). Meaning and narrative structure. Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics, 5, 1220.
Reinhart, T. (1984). Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics, 22, 779809.
Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328350.
Rosch, E. H. (1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B. B. (eds.), Cognition and categorization, pp. 2748. Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Salaberry, R. (1998). The development of aspectual distinctions in L2 French classroom learning. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 508542.
Salaberry, R. (1999). The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 20, 151178.
Salaberry, R. (2000). The development of past tense morphology in L2 Spanish. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Salaberry, R. (2002). Tense and aspect in the selection of past tense verbal morphology. In Salaberry, & Shirai, (eds.), pp. 397–415.
Salaberry, R. (2003). Tense and aspect in verbal morphology. Hispania, 86, 559573.
Salaberry, R. (2008). Marking past tense in second language acquisition: A theoretical model. New York: Continuum Books.
Salaberry, R. (2011). Assessing the effect of lexical aspect and grounding on the acquisition of L2 Spanish past tense morphology among L1 English speakers. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 14 (2), 184202.
Salaberry, R., & Ayoun, D. (2005). The development of L2 tense/aspect in the Romance languages. In Ayoun, D. & Salaberry, R. (eds.), Tense and aspect in Romance languages: Theoretical and applied perspectives, pp. 134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Salaberry, R., & Shirai, Y. (eds.) (2002). L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Schütze, C. T. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Shirai, Y. (1993). Inherent aspect and the acquisition of tense/aspect morphology in Japanese. In Nakajima, H. & Otsu, Y. (eds.), Argument structure: Its syntax and acquisition, pp. 185211. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Shirai, Y. (1995). Tense-aspect marking by L2-learners of Japanese. In MacLaughlin, D. & Ewen, S. Mc. (eds.), Proceedings of 19th Annual Boston University Conference in Language Development, pp. 575586. Somerville, MA: Casacadilla Press.
Shirai, Y. (2004). A multiple-factor account to form–meaning connection in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In VanPatten, B. (ed.), Form–meaning connections in second language acquisitions, pp. 91112. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R. (1995). The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, 71, 743762.
Shirai, Y., & Kurono, A. (1998). The acquisition of tense-aspect marking in Japanese as a second language. Language Learning, 48, 245279.
Slabakova, R. (1999). The parameter of aspect in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 15 (3), 283317.
Slabakova, R. (2001). Telicity in the second language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Slabakova, R., & Montrul, S. (2003). Genericity and aspect in L2 acquisition. Language Acquisition, 11 (3), 165196.
Smith, C. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Smith, C. (2003). Aspectual entities and tense in discourse. In Kempchinsky, P. & Slabakova, R. (eds.), The syntax, semantics and acquisition of aspect, pp. 223238. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Tenny, C. (1994). Aspectual roles and the syntax–semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Tracy-Ventura, N. (2008). Developmental readiness and tense/aspect: An instructional study of L2 Preterit and Imperfect acquisition in Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
Tracy-Ventura, N. (2012). Testing the Distributional Bias Hypothesis: A corpus-based investigation of lexical and grammatical aspect in native speaker Spanish. Ms., University of Southampton.
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY & London: Cornell University Press.
Verkuyl, H. J. (1993). A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Véronique, D. (1987). Reference to past events and actions in narratives in L2: Insights from North African learners’ French. In Pfaff, C. W. (ed.), First and second language acquisition processes, pp. 252272. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Wagner, L. (2010). The acquisition of semantics. Cognitive Science, 1, 519526.
Wallace, S. (1982). Figure and ground: The interrelationships of linguistic categories. In Hopper, P. (ed.), Tense-aspect: Between syntax and pragmatics, pp. 201226. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Wasow, T., & Arnold, J. (2003). Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. In Rohdenburg, G. & Mondorf, B. (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, pp. 119154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Weist, R. M. (1989). Aspects of the roots of language: Commentary on Cziko. First Language, 9, 4549.
White, L. (1989). Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Wulff, S., Ellis, N., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & LeBlanc, C. (2009). The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora, cognition, and learner constructions. Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 354369.



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed