Article contents
Prototype effects in first and second language learners: The case of English transitive semantics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2017
Abstract
According to usage-based approaches to language acquisition, linguistic constructions should display prototype effects, or graded category membership (e.g., Bybee, 2010). Using the prototype-plus-distortion methodology (Franks & Bransford, 1971), Ibbotson, Theakston, Lieven, and Tomasello (2012) have provided evidence for prototype effects in adult native English speakers, who had false-positive recognition of sentences with prototypical transitive semantics as having been previously encountered after being exposed to non-prototypical transitive semantics. In the current study, I adopted this methodology and investigated whether the effects can be replicated and additionally observed from English-as-a-second-language (ESL) learners. Results from two groups of adult native English speakers (N=20 and N=21), each exposed to a different stimuli set, suggested some, but not strong, effects and revealed the complexity of the use of this methodology with linguistic materials. Moreover, no effects were observed from advanced adult ESL learners (N=22), suggesting possible differences between first and second transitive semantic representations.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
Footnotes
Figure 1, Table 8 and Figure 4 are based on Figure 1, Table 2 and Figure 6 in Ibbotson et al. (2012). Permission has been granted by the publisher to reproduce them. They remain copyright © 2012 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. All rights reserved. This permission does not include the right to grant others permission to photocopy or otherwise reproduce this material except for accessible versions made by non-profit organisations serving the blind, visually impaired and other persons with print disabilities (VIPs).
*I would like to thank Aline Godfroid, Debra Hardison, and Sakol Suethanapornkul for their useful suggestions on earlier drafts of the manuscript. I am also grateful to Elizabeth Lavolette and Virginia David for their respective help with stimuli development and participant recruitment. In addition, the manuscript benefited significantly from the insightful and constructive feedback from two anonymous reviewers. Final responsibility for any errors is my own.
References
- 2
- Cited by