Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768dbb666b-gx6zg Total loading time: 1.286 Render date: 2023-02-02T12:45:57.741Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Age of acquisition and proficiency as factors in language production: Agreement in bilinguals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2009

REBECCA FOOTE*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
*
Address for correspondence: University of Illinois, Department of Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese, 4080 Foreign Languages Building, MC – 176, 707 S. Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USArfoote@illinois.edu

Abstract

Research on the production of subject–verb number agreement in monolinguals suggests differences between and within languages in how it proceeds as a function of morphological richness. When agreement morphology is relatively rich, the influence of conceptual number over grammatical number is less than when it is relatively poor. Within the framework of Eberhard, Cutting and Bock's (2005) marking and morphing account of agreement production, this finding is explained by how number features from the syntax and the lexicon are reconciled. This study asks: (1) Can this account of differences in agreement production as a function of morphological richness be extended to the case of bilinguals? (2) Do age of acquisition and/or proficiency modulate whether these differences surface in bilinguals? Agreement production was examined in early and late English–Spanish, and late Spanish–English bilinguals of varying proficiency. Higher-proficiency bilinguals patterned similarly to monolinguals, supporting the extension of the marking and morphing account.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research reported in this article is a revised version of portions of the author's PhD dissertation, completed at the University of Illinois. Earlier versions of this research were presented at the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (Pennsylvania State University, November 2005) and at the American Association for Applied Linguistics (Costa Mesa, CA, April 2007). Thanks go to Silvina Montrul and Kathryn Bock for their supervision of the dissertation, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. All remaining errors are my own.

References

Beck, M. L. (1998). L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English-speaking learners of German and the local impairment hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 (3), 311348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68 (4), 706755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2006).) Age and second language acquisition and processing, a selective overview. Language Learning, 56 (S1), 949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44 (2), 235249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S. & Schachter, J. (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, pp. 4168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1995). Producing agreement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4 (2), 5661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K., Carreiras, M. & Meseguer, E. (2009). Number meaning and number agreement in English and Spanish. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Bock, J. K., Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., Meyer, A. S. & Schriefers, H. (2001). Some attractions of verb agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 43 (2), 83128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, J. K. & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23 (1), 4593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clahsen, H. (1990). The comparative study of first and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12 (2), 135153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27 (1), 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. & Muysken, P. (1989). The UG paradox in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research, 5 (1), 129.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 313348. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Kim, B., Kim, H-j., Wang, Y-T., Kim, H-K. & Lee, J. K. (2008). Intermediate traces and anaphora resolution in the processing of English as a second language. In Chan, H., Jacob, H. & Kapia, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, vol. 1, pp. 8495. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, A. & Dank, M. (2009). Conflicting cues and competition between notional and grammatical factors in producing number and gender agreement: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 60 (1), 114143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, K. M. (1997). The marked effect of number on subject–verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 36 (2), 147164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, K. M. (1999). The accessibility of conceptual number to the processes of subject–verb agreement in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 41 (4), 560578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C. & Bock, J. K. (2005). Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review, 112 (3), 531559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eubank, L. (1994). Optionality and the initial state in L2 development. In Hoekstra, T. & Schwartz, B. (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, pp. 369388. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fayol, M., Largy, P. & Lemaire, P. (1994). Cognitive overload and orthographic errors: When cognitive overload enhances subject–verb agreement errors. A study in French written language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A (2), 437464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, R. & Bock, J. K. (2009). The role of morphology in subject–verb number agreement: A comparison of Mexican and Dominican Spanish. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Guillelmon, D. & Grosjean, F. (2001). The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 29 (3), 503511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartsuiker, R. J. & Barkhuysen, P. N. (2006). Language production and working memory: The case of subject–verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21 (1–3), 181204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. & Huinck, W. (1999). Agrammatic production of subject–verb agreement: The effect of conceptual number. Brain and Language, 69 (2), 119160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartsuiker, R. J., Schriefers, H. J., Bock, J. K. & Kikstra, G. M. (2003). Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject–verb agreement. Memory & Cognition, 31 (8), 13161326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, R. & Chan, C. Y. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The “Failed Functional Features Hypothesis”. Second Language Research, 13 (3), 187226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M. & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16 (1), 7398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25 (4), 603634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipski, J. (1993). Creoloid phenomena in the Spanish of transitional bilinguals. In Roca, A. & Lipski, J. (eds.), Spanish in the United States, pp. 155173. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lorimor, H., Bock, J. K., Zalkind, E., Sheyman, A. & Beard, R. (2008). Agreement and attraction in Russian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23 (6), 769799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, C. (2008). Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation. Second Language Research, 24 (4), 459486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21 (3), 395423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55 (3), 381401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. (1990). Grammatical development in the simultaneous acquisition of two languages. In Meisel, J. (ed.), Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children, pp. 89130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. (1997). The L2 basic variety as an I-language. Second Language Research, 13 (4), 374385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. (2004). The bilingual child. In Bhatia, T. K., & Ritchie, W. C. (eds.), The handbook of bilingualism, pp. 91113. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5 (1), 3968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2004). Convergent outcomes in second language acquisition and first language loss. In Schmid, M., Köpke, B., Keijzer, M. & Weilemar, L. (eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues, pp. 259280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2006). On the bilingual competence of Spanish heritage speakers: Syntax, lexical-semantics and processing. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10 (1), 3769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R. & Perpiñán, S. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58 (3), 503553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J. & Greth, D. (2003). Production of subject–verb agreement in Spanish as a second language. Experimental Psychology, 50 (3), 196203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J., Teller, M. & Greth, D. (2001). The production of verb agreement in monolingual, bilingual, and second language speakers. In Nicol, J. L. (ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing, pp. 117133. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2008). Gender under incomplete acquisition: Heritage speakers’ knowledge of noun categorization. The Heritage Language Journal, 6 (1).Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access hypothesis. Second Language Research, 12 (1), 4072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toribio, A. J. (2000). Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish. Lingua, 110 (5), 315341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4 (2), 105122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, G. (2005). Bilingualism, heritage language learners, and SLA research: Opportunities lost or seized? Modern Language Journal, 89 (3), 410426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B. & Garrett, M. F. (1996). Subject–verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints. Cognition, 61 (3), 261298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B. & Semenza, C. (1995). Constructing subject–verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 34 (2), 186215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Hartsuiker, R. J., Jarema, G. & Kolk, H. H. J. (1996). One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11 (4), 407442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12 (3), 233265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M. & Leung, Y.-K. I. (2004). Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25 (1), 105133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Age of acquisition and proficiency as factors in language production: Agreement in bilinguals*
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Age of acquisition and proficiency as factors in language production: Agreement in bilinguals*
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Age of acquisition and proficiency as factors in language production: Agreement in bilinguals*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *