Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T08:31:22.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cognitive-behaviour Therapy: Towards the New Millennium!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Timothy J. Sharp*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney Pain Management and Research Centre
*
University of Sydney Pain Management and Research Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia. E-mail: tsharp@med.su.oz.au
Get access

Extract

Following on from the American Psychological Association's (1993) findings regarding empirically validated treatments, a British task force (Roth & Fonagy, 1996) arrived at similar conclusions. Both publications strongly endorsed the superior efficacy of cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) over placebos, waiting list controls and other psychological treatments. These findings, although not new, are becoming increasingly important as new ways of funding health care become more likely. With these probable changes in health system funding, organisations such as the Australian Association for Cognitive and Behaviour Therapy will almost certainly be asked to provide evidence supporting the efficacy of certain interventions for certain problems, but also to decide who can implement such treatments. This article attempts to present the well known findings within the current framework, and poses an important question: Who can ethically and competently practice CBT?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychological Association. (1993). Final report of the task force on promotion and dissemination of psychological procedures. New York: American Psychological Association, Division of Clinical Psychologists (Division 12).Google Scholar
Blanchard, E., Schwarz, S., & Radnitz, C. (1987). Psychological assessment and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Behavior Modification, 11, 348372.Google Scholar
Grahame-Smith, D. (1995). Evidence-based medicine: Socratic dissent. British Medical Journal, 310, 11261127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, A. (1997). Introduction to special issue on empirically validated treatments. Behaviour Change, 14, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, N. (1997). Empirically validated treatments and AACBT. Behaviour Change, 14, 25.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (1997). The future of training in clinical and health psychology. In Nicholson, J. & Young, R. (Eds.), Programme and abstracts: National Conference of the AACBT (p. 16). Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roth, A., & Fonagy, P. (1996). What works for whom? A critical review of the psychotherapy research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Sackett, D., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J., Haynes, R., & Richardson, W. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312, 7172.Google Scholar
Sanders, M. (1996). Family interventions in the prevention of psychological distress. Paper presented at the Annual National Conference of the Australian Association for Cognitive and Behaviour Therapy, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Sharpe, M., Hawton, K., Simkin, S., Surawy, C., Hackmann, A., Klimes, I., Peto, T., Warrell, D., & Seagroatt, V. (1996). Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: A randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 312, 2226.Google Scholar
Tender, J. (1995). Presidential address. Presented at the Annual National Conference of the Australian Association for Cognitive and Behaviour Therapy, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Williams, A., Richardson, P., Nicholas, M., Pither, C., Harding, V., Ridout, K., Ralphs, J., Richardson, I., Justins, D., & Chamberlain, J. (1996). Inpatient vs. outpatient pain management: Results of a randomised controlled trial. Pain, 66, 1322.Google Scholar