Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The science of consciousness must include its more advanced forms

  • Andrew Vonasch (a1), E. J. Masicampo (a2) and Roy F. Baumeister (a1)

Abstract

Morsella et al. argue that science should not focus on high forms of consciousness. We disagree. An understanding of high forms of consciousness is invaluable to the scientific study of consciousness. Moreover, it poses challenges to the passive frame theory. Specifically, it challenges the notions that conscious thoughts are not connected and that consciousness serves skeletomotor conflict only.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Baumeister, R. F. & Masicampo, E. J. (2010) Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: How mental simulations serve the animal–culture interface. Psychological Review 117(3):945–71.
Block, N. (1995a) How many concepts of consciousness? (Response article) Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18(2):272–87.
Damasio, A. R. (1999) The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harvest Books.
Edelman, G. M. (2004) Wider than the sky: The phenomenal gift of consciousness. Yale University Press.
James, W. (1890) The principles of psychology, vols. 1 & 2. Holt/Dover.
Mendl, M. & Paul, E. S. (2004) Consciousness, emotion and animal welfare: Insights from cognitive science. Animal Welfare 13(Suppl.):S1725.
Panksepp, J. (2005) Affective consciousness: Core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Consciousness and Cognition 14:3080.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed