Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:05:54.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metacognition and conscious experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

Bennett L. Schwartz  and
Ali Pournaghdali
Bennett L. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida International University, University Park, Miami, FL 33199. bennett.schwartz@fiu.eduapour005@fiu.eduwww.bennettschwartz.com
Ali Pournaghdali
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida International University, University Park, Miami, FL 33199. bennett.schwartz@fiu.eduapour005@fiu.eduwww.bennettschwartz.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Morsella et al. focus on the conscious nature of sensation. However, also critical to an understanding of consciousness is the role of internally generated experience, such as the content of autobiographical memory or metacognitive experiences. For example, tip-of-the-tongue states are conscious feelings that arise when recall fails. Internally driven experiences drive us to action and therefore are consistent with the current approach.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e195
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Block, N. (2009) Comparing the major theories of consciousness. In: The cognitive neurosciences IV, ed. Gazzaniga, M., pp. 1111–22. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. (2010) Philosophy of mind, 3rd edition. Westview Press.Google Scholar
Koriat, A. (2007) Metacognition and consciousness. In: The Cambridge handbook of consciousness, ed. Zelazo, P. D., Moscovitch, M. & Thompson, E., pp. 289–325. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kornell, N. (2014) Where is the “meta” in animal metacognition? Journal of Comparative Psychology 128:143–49.Google Scholar
Kostic, B., Booth, S. E. & Cleary, A. M. (2015) The role of analogy in reports of presque vu: Does reporting the presque vu state signal the near retrieval of a source analogy? Journal of Cognitive Psychology 27:739–54.Google Scholar
Maril, A., Simons, J. S., Weaver, J. J. & Schacter, D. L. (2005) Graded recall success: An event-related fMRI comparison of tip of the tongue and feeling of knowing. Neuroimage 24:1130–38.Google Scholar
Maril, A., Wagner, A. D. & Schacter, D. L. (2001) On the tip of the tongue: An event-related fMRI study of semantic retrieval failure and cognitive conflict. Neuron 31:653–60.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. & Schwartz, B. L. (2016) The ghost in the machine: Self-reflective consciousness and the neuroscience of metacognition. In: Oxford handbook of metamemory, ed. Dunlosky, J. & Tauber, S., pp. 407–24. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reder, L. M., ed. (1996) Implicit memory and metacognition. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. L. & Cleary, A. M. (2016) Tip-of-the-tongue states, déjà vu and other metacognitive oddities. In: Oxford handbook of metamemory, ed. Dunlosky, J. & Tauber, S., pp. 95–108. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. L. & Metcalfe, J. (2011) Tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states: Retrieval, behavior, and experience. Memory and Cognition 39:737–49.Google Scholar
Wachowski, A. & Wachowski, L. (1999) The Matrix. Warner Bros.Google Scholar