Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T22:23:19.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consciousness generates agent action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2022

Jonathan Delafield-Butt
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Innovation in Autism, University of Strathclyde, GlasgowG1 1QE, UKjonathan.delafield-butt@strath.ac.ukhttps://www.strath.ac.uk/staff/delafieldbuttjonathandr/
Colwyn Trevarthen
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Philosophy, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Dugald Stewart Building, EdinburghEH8 9AD, UK. c.trevarthen@ed.ac.uk

Abstract

Consciousness directs the actions of the agent for its own purposive gains. It re-organises a stimulus-response linear causality to deliver generative, creative agent action that evaluates the subsequent experience prospectively. This inversion of causality affords special properties of control that are not accounted for in integrated information theory (IIT), which is predicated on a linear, deterministic cause-effect model. IIT remains an incomplete, abstract, and disembodied theory without explanation of the psychobiology of consciousness that serves the vital agency the organism.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attenborough, D. (2020). A life on our planet: My witness statement and a vision for the future. Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Basile, P. (2010) It must be true – But how can it be? Some remarks on panpsychism and mental composition. In: The metaphysics of consciousness, eds. Basile, P., Kiverstein, J., & Phemister, P., pp. 93112. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2019). Consciousness as generative entanglement. Journal of Philosophy 116(12), 645662.10.5840/jphil20191161241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. Pantheon/Random House.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872). The expressions of emotion in man and animals. London: Methuen.10.1037/10001-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delafield-Butt, J. T. (2014) Process and action: Whitehead's ontological units and perceptuomotor control units. In: Life and process, ed. Koutroufinis, S., pp. 133156. De Gruyter Ontos.10.1515/9783110352597.133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delafield-Butt, J. T., Freer, Y., Perkins, J., Skulina, D., Schögler, B., & Lee, D. N. (2018). Prospective organization of neonatal arm movements: A motor foundation of embodied agency, disrupted in premature birth. Developmental Science 21(6), e12693.10.1111/desc.12693CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delafield-Butt, J. T., & Gangopadhyay, N. (2013). Sensorimotor intentionality: The origins of intentionality in prospective agent action. Developmental Review 33(4), 399425.10.1016/j.dr.2013.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, P. (2019). Galileo's error: Foundations for a new science of consciousness. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Grossberg, S. (2021). Conscious mind resonant brain. Oxford University Press, quoted in https://blog.oup.com/2021/07/why-did-evolution-create-conscious-states-of-mind/.10.1093/oso/9780190070557.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, S. (1967). Mind: An essay on human feeling. John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. (1716) La Monadologie.Google Scholar
Macmurray, J. (1959). The self as agent (volume I of The form of the personal). Faber and Faber. (Paperback, 1969).Google Scholar
Merker, B. (2005). The liabilities of mobility: A selection pressure for the transition to consciousness in animal evolution. Consciousness and Cognition 14, 89114.10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00002-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merker, B. (2007). Consciousness without a cerebral cortex: A challenge for neuroscience and medicine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, 63134.10.1017/S0140525X07000891CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oizumi, M., Albantakis, L., & Tononi, G. (2014). From the phenomenology to the mechanisms of consciousness: Integrated information theory 3.0. PLoS Computational Biology 10(5), e1003588.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panksepp, J., & Biven, L. (2012). The archaeology of mind: Neuroevolutionary origins of human emotions. Norton.Google Scholar
Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solms, M. (2021). The hidden spring: A journey to the source of consciousness. Profile Books.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. (2006) Realistic monism: Why physicalism entails panpsychism. In: Consciousness and Its place in nature, ed. Freeman, A., pp. 331. Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Tononi, G. (2004). An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience 5(1), 42.10.1186/1471-2202-5-42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trevarthen, C., & Delafield-Butt, J. (2017b) Intersubjectivity in the imagination and feelings of the infant: Implications for education in the early years. In: Under-three year olds in policy and practice (policy and pedagogy with under-three year olds: Cross-disciplinary insights and innovations), eds. White, E. J. and Dalli, C., pp. 1739. Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-2275-3_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevarthen, C., & Delafield-Butt, J. T. (2015) The infant's creative vitality, In projects of self-discovery and shared meaning: How they anticipate school, and make It fruitful. In: International handbook of young children's thinking and understanding, eds. Robson, S. & Quinn, S. F., pp. 318. Routledge.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C., & Delafield-Butt, J. T. (2017a) Development of consciousness. In: Cambridge encyclopedia of child development, eds. Hopkins, B., Geangu, E. & Linkenauger, S., pp. 821835. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316216491.131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandekerckhove, M., & Panksepp, J. (2011). A neurocognitive theory of higher mental emergence: From anoetic affective experiences to noetic knowledge and autonoetic awareness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 35(9), 20172025.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality. Macmillan.Google Scholar