Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:18:05.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transdisciplinary Research and Aboriginal Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Michael Christie*
Affiliation:
School of Australian Indigenous Knowledge Systems, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, 0909, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Indigenous academic researchers are involved in Indigenist, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research, all of which present problems and opportunities for Indigenous knowledge traditions. Transdisciplinary research is different from interdisciplinary research because it moves beyond the disciplinarity of the university and takes into account knowledge practices which the university will never fully understand. Indigenous knowledge traditions resist definition from a Western academic perspective - there are Indigenous knowledge practices which will never engage with the academy, just as there are some branches of the academy which will never acknowledge Indigenous knowledge practices. In this paper I present the story of my own non-Indigenous perspective on Indigenous research and what happens to it in a university. I am not concerned here with the knowledge production work Aboriginal people do in their own ways and contexts for their own purposes, but rather turn my attention to some of the issues which emerge when transdisciplinary research practice involves Australian Indigenous communities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cass, A., Lowell, A., Christie, M., Snelling, P., Flack, M., & Marrnganyin, B. et al. (2002). Sharing the true stories: Improving communication between Aboriginal patients and healthcare workers. The Medical Journal of Australia, 176(10), 466470.Google Scholar
Christie, M. (1994). Grounded and ex-centric knowledges: Exploring Aboriginal alternatives to Western thinking. In Edwards, J. (Ed.), Thinking: International interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 2434). Highlett, VIC: Hawker Brownlow Education.Google Scholar
Christie, M. (In press). Digital tools and the management of Australian Aboriginal desert knowledge. In Wilson, P., & Stewart, M. (Eds.), Global Indigenous media: Cultures, practices and politics. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Christie, M., & Perrett, W. (1996). Negotiating resources: Language, knowledge and the search for “secret English” in northeast Arnhem Land. In Howitt, R., Connell, J., & Hirsch, P. (Eds.), Resources, nations and Indigenous peoples (pp. 5765). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conquergood, D. (2002). Performance studies: Interventions and radical research. The Drama Review, 46(2), 145156.Google Scholar
CRC Aboriginal Health. (2003). Sharing the true stories: Improving communication in Indigenous health care. Retrieved 9 September, 2004, from http://www.sharingtruestories.com/.Google Scholar
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Deloria, V., Foehner, K., & Scinta, S. (1999). Spirit and reason: The VineDeloria reader. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, M. (2005a). The ethics-review process. Anthropology News, 46(6), 1011.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, M. (2005b). Punctuated equilibrium, moral panics, and the ethics review process. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2(2), 315338.Google Scholar
Goodman, N., & Elgin, C.Z. (1988). A reconception of philosophy. In Goodman, N., & Elgin, C.Z. (Eds.), Reconceptions in philosophy and other arts andsciences. (pp. 155&161). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium: FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hester, L., & Cheney, J. (2001). Truth and Native American epistemology. Social Epistemologa, 15(4), 319334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E., & Klausen, T. (2000). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. Retrieved 17 September, 2004, from http://hci.ucsd.edu/10/cockpit-cog.pdf.Google Scholar
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Law, J., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell/The Sociological Review.Google Scholar
Marika-Mununggiritj, R. (1990). Workshops as teaching learning environments. Ngoonjook, 4, 4354.Google Scholar
Marika-Mununggiritj, R. (1991a). How can Balanda (White Australians) learn about the Aboriginal world? Ngoondjook, 5, 1725.Google Scholar
Marika-Mununggiritj, R. (1991b). Some notes on principles for Aboriginal pedagogy. Ngoondjook, 6, 3334.Google Scholar
Marika-Mununggiritj, R., & Christie, M. (1995). Yolngu metaphors for learning. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 113, 59362.Google Scholar
Marika-Mununggiritj, R., Maymuru, B., Mununggurr, M., Munyarryun, B., Ngurruwutthun, G., & Yunupingu, Y. (1990). The history of the Yirrkala community school: Yolngu thinking about education in the Laynha and Yirrkala Area. Ngoonjook, 3, 3252.Google Scholar
Martin, K. (2003). Ways of knowing, ways of being and ways of doing: Developing a theoretical framework and methods for Indigenous research and Indigenist research. Retrieved 4 November, 2006, from http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/5718/MARTIN.pdf.Google Scholar
Maypilama, G., Christie, M., Greatorex, J., & Grace, J. (2004). Yolngu long-grassers on Larrakia land: First language research report for the Community Harmony Project Darwin and Palmerston. Retrieved 1 September, 2005, from http://learnline.cdu.edu.au/yolngustudies/docs/Longgrass_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Memmott, P., & Fantin, S. (2001). The long grassers: A strategic report on Indigenous ‘itinerants’ in the Darwin and Palmerston area. Retrieved 3 September, 2006, from http://www.dcdsca.nt.gov.au/dcdsca/intranet.nsf/Files/community_harmony/$file/long_grassers_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Ngurruwutthun, D. (1991). The garma project. In Bunbury, R., Hastings, W., Henry, J., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.), Aboriginal pedagogy: Aboriginal teachers speak out (pp. 107122). Melbourne: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Rigney, L.I. (1997). Internationalism of an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander anti-colonial cultural critique of research methodologies: A guide to Indigenist research methodology and its principles. In HERSDA SA (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: Advancing international perspectives (Vol. 20) (pp. 629636). Canberra: Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australasia.Google Scholar
Savulescu, J., Chalmers, I., & Blunt, J. (1996). Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability. British Medical Journal, 313, 13901393.Google Scholar
Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Tress, B., Tress, G., & van der Velk, A. (2004). Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinarity in landscape studies: The Wageningen Delta approach. In Tress, B., Tress, G., van der Velk, A., & Fry, G. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies: Potential and limitations (Delta Series No. 2) (pp. 815). Wageningen, NL: Delta Program.Google Scholar
Verran, H. (2002a). A postcolonial moment in science studies: Alternative firing regimes of environmental scientists and Aboriginal landowners. Social Studies of Science, 32(5/6), 729762.Google Scholar
Verran, H. (2002b). “Transferring” strategies of land management: The knowledge practices of Indigenous landowners and environmental scientists. Research in Science and Technology Studies, 13, 155181.Google Scholar
Watson, H., & Chambers, D.W. (1989). Singing the land, signing the land. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar