Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:29:42.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clustered or dispersed: testing the effect of sampling strategy to census burrow-nesting petrels with varied distributions at sub-Antarctic Marion Island

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2019

Ben J. Dilley ,
David W. Hedding ,
Dominic A.W. Henry ,
Kalinka Rexer-Huber ,
Graham C. Parker ,
Stefan Schoombie Open the ORCID record for Stefan Schoombie [Opens in a new window] ,
Alexis Osborne  and
Peter G. Ryan
Ben J. Dilley*
Affiliation:
FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
David W. Hedding
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of South Africa, Florida 1710, South Africa
Dominic A.W. Henry
Affiliation:
The Endangered Wildlife Trust, Johannesburg 1645, South Africa Statistics in Ecology, Environment and Conservation, Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
Kalinka Rexer-Huber
Affiliation:
Parker Conservation, 126 Maryhill Terrace, Dunedin, New Zealand
Graham C. Parker
Affiliation:
Parker Conservation, 126 Maryhill Terrace, Dunedin, New Zealand
Stefan Schoombie
Affiliation:
FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
Alexis Osborne
Affiliation:
FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
Peter G. Ryan
Affiliation:
FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
*
dilleyben@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We compared systematic and random survey techniques to estimate breeding population sizes of burrow-nesting petrel species on Marion Island. White-chinned (Procellaria aequinoctialis) and blue (Halobaena caerulea) petrel population sizes were estimated in systematic surveys (which attempt to count every colony) in 2009 and 2012, respectively. In 2015, we counted burrows of white-chinned, blue and great-winged (Pterodroma macroptera) petrels within 52 randomized strip transects (25 m wide, total 144 km). Burrow densities were extrapolated by Geographic Information System-derived habitat attributes (geology, vegetation, slope, elevation, aspect) to generate island-wide burrow estimates. Great-winged petrel burrows were found singly or in small groups at low densities (2 burrows ha−1); white-chinned petrel burrows were in loose clusters at moderate densities (3 burrows ha−1); and blue petrel burrows were in tight clusters at high densities (13 burrows ha−1). The random survey estimated 58% more white-chinned petrels but 42% fewer blue petrels than the systematic surveys. The results suggest that random transects are best suited for species that are widely distributed at low densities, but become increasingly poor for estimating population sizes of species with clustered distributions. Repeated fixed transects provide a robust way to monitor changes in colony density and area, but might fail to detect the formation/disappearance of new colonies.

Keywords

burrow surveysGIShabitatsmonitoringrandomsystematic
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 231 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbraud, C. & Delord, K. 2006. Population census of blue petrels Halobaena caerulea at Mayes Island, Iles Kerguelen. Antarctic Science, 18, 199–204.Google Scholar
Blackburn, T.M., Cassey, P., Duncan, R.P., Evans, K.L. & Gaston, K.J. 2004. Avian extinction and mammalian introductions on oceanic islands. Science, 305, 1955–1958.Google Scholar
Boelhouwers, J.C., Meiklejohn, K.I., Holness, S.D. & Hedding, D.W. 2008. Geology, geomorphology and climate change. In Chown, S.L. & Froneman, P.W., eds. The Prince Edward Islands: land-sea interactions in a changing ecosystem. Stellenbosch: SUN Press, 65–96.Google Scholar
Brooke, M. 2004. Albatrosses and petrels across the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 552 pp.Google Scholar
Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 220 pp.Google Scholar
Canty, A. & Ripley, B. 2012. boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions. R package version 1.3–4. R Core Team. 2013. In R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 3.0.1). Vienna: Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Dilley, B.J., Schramm, M. & Ryan, P.G. 2017a. Modest increases in densities of burrow-nesting petrels following the removal of cats Felis catus from Marion Island. Polar Biology, 40, 625–637.Google Scholar
Dilley, B.J., Davies, D., Schramm, M., Connan, M. & Ryan, P.G. 2017c. The distribution and abundance of blue petrels Halobaena caerulea breeding at subantarctic Marion Island. Emu, 117, 222–232.Google Scholar
Dilley, B.J., Davies, D., Stevens, K., Schoombie, S., Schoombie, J. & Ryan, P.G. 2019. Burrow wars and sinister behaviour among burrow-nesting petrels at sub-Antarctic Marion Island. Ardea, 107, 97–102.Google Scholar
Dilley, B.J., Schoombie, S., Stevens, K., Davies, D., Perold, V., Osborne, A., et al. 2017b. Mouse predation affects breeding success of burrow-nesting petrels at sub-Antarctic Marion Island. Antarctic Science, 30, 93–104.Google Scholar
Fugler, S.R., Hunter, S., Newton, I.P. & Steele, W.K. 1987. Breeding biology of blue-petrels Halobaena caerulea at the prince Edward Islands. Emu, 87, 103–110.Google Scholar
Gremmen, N.J.M. & Smith, V.R. 2008. Terrestrial vegetation and dynamics. In Chown, S.L. & Froneman, P.W., eds. The Prince Edward Islands: land-sea interactions in a changing ecosystem. Stellenbosch: SUN Press, 215–244.Google Scholar
Hedding, D.W. 2008. Spatial inventory of landforms in the recently exposed central highland of sub-Antarctic Marion Island. South African Geographical Journal, 90, 11–21.Google Scholar
Imber, M.J., Harrison, M., Wood, S.E. & Cotter, R.N. 2003. An estimate of numbers of grey-faced petrels Pterodroma macroptera gouldi breeding on Moutohora (Whale Island), Bay of Plenty, New Zealand, during 1998–2000. Notornis, 50, 23–26.Google Scholar
Lawton, K., Robertson, G., Kirkwood, R., Valencia, J., Schlatter, R. & Smith, D. 2006. An estimate of population sizes of burrowing seabirds at the Diego Ramirez archipelago, Chile, using distance sampling and burrow-scoping. Polar Biology, 29, 229–238.Google Scholar
Mucina, L. & Rutherford, M.C., eds. 2006. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia, 19, 803 pp.Google Scholar
Oppel, S., Hervías, S., Oliveira, N., Pipa, T., Silva, C., Geraldes, P., et al. 2014. Estimating population size of a nocturnal burrow-nesting seabird using acoustic monitoring and habitat mapping. Nature Conservation, 7, 1–13.Google Scholar
Paleczny, M., Hammill, E., Karpouzi, V. & Pauly, D. 2015. Population trend of the world's monitored seabirds, 1950–2010. PLoS One, 10, e0129342.Google Scholar
Parker, G.C. & Rexer-Huber, K. 2015. Literature review of methods for estimating population size of burrowing petrels based on extrapolations from surveys. Wellington: Department of Conservation.Google Scholar
Parker, G.C., Rexer-Huber, K. & Thompson, D. 2017. Grey petrel population on Campbell Island 14 years after rodent eradication. Antarctic Science, 29, 209–216.Google Scholar
Preston, G.R., Dilley, B.J., Cooper, J. & Ryan, P.G. 2019. A plan of action to eradicate introduced house mice on South Africa's sub-Antarctic Marion Island. In Veitch, C.R., Clout, M.N., Martin, A.R., Russell, J.C. & West, C.J., eds. Island invasives: scaling up to meet the challenge. Occasional Paper SSC. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
R Core Team 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.1. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org.Google Scholar
Rand, R.W. 1954. Notes on the birds of Marion Island. Ibis, 96, 173–206.Google Scholar
Rayner, M.J., Clout, M.N., Stamp, R.K., Imber, M.J., Brunton, D.H. & Hauber, M.E. 2007. Predictive habitat modeling improves the population census accuracy of a burrowing seabird: a study of the endangered Cook's petrel. Biological Conservation, 138, 235–247.Google Scholar
Rexer-Huber, K., Parker, G.C., Sagar, P.M. & Thompson, D.R. 2017. White-chinned petrel population estimate, Disappointment Island (Auckland Islands). Polar Biology, 40, 1053–1061.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, A., Arcos, J.M., Bretagnolle, V., Dias, M.P., Holmes, N.D., Louzao, M., et al. 2019. Future directions in conservation research on petrels and shearwaters. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 94.Google Scholar
Ryan, P.G. & Ronconi, R.A. 2011. Continued increase in numbers of spectacled petrels Procellaria conspicillata. Antarctic Science, 23, 332–336.Google Scholar
Ryan, P.G., Dilley, B.J. & Jones, M.G.W. 2012. The distribution and abundance of white-chinned petrels Procellaria aequinoctialis breeding at the sub-Antarctic Prince Edward Islands. Polar Biology, 35, 1851–1859.Google Scholar
Schramm, M. 1986. Burrow densities and nest site preferences of petrels Procellariidae at the Prince Edward Islands. Polar Biology, 6, 63–70.Google Scholar
Schumann, N., Dann, P., Hoskins, A.J. & Arnould, J.P. 2013. Optimizing survey effort for burrow-nesting seabirds. Journal of Field Ornithology, 84, 69–85.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A.L., Lyver, P.O.B., Jones, C.J., Bellingham, P.J., Macleod, C.J., Coleman, M., et al. 2014. Establishing accurate baseline estimates of breeding populations of a burrowing seabird, the grey-faced petrel Pterodroma macroptera gouldi in New Zealand. Biological Conservation, 169, 109–116.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Dilley et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2 and Figures S1-S3

Download Dilley et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 431.5 KB