Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T10:42:17.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Psychology of Reading: Evolutionary and Revolutionary Developments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Keith E. Stanovich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The scope of this review must be restricted in several ways. First the focus is on reading specifically. Although reading is but a component of the language activities called literacy, it must certainly be at the heart of whatever concept of literacy is adopted (Venezky, Wagner and Ciliberti 1990).

Type
Foundations of Literacy
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 12 , March 1991 , pp. 3 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aborn, M., Rubenstein, H. and Sterling, T. D.. 1959. Sources of contextual constraint upon words in sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 57.171–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allington, R. L. and Fleming, J. T.. 1978. The misreading of high-frequency words. Journal of Special Education. 12.417–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allington, R. L. and Strange, M.. 1977. Effects of grapheme substitutions in connected text upon reading behaviors. Visible Language. 11.285–297.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C. and Pearson, P. D.. 1984. A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In Pearson, P. D. et al. (eds.) Handbook of Reading Research. New York: Longman. 255–291.Google Scholar
Backman, J., Bruck, M., Hebert, M. and Siedenberg, M.. 1984. Acquisition and use of spelling–sound correspondences in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 38.114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. 1986, Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baker, L. and Brown, A. L.. 1984. Metacognitive skills and reading. In Pearson, P. D. et al. (eds.) Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman. 353–394.Google Scholar
Balota, D., Pollatsek, A. and Rayner, K.. 1985. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology. 17.364–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barron, R. 1986. Word recognition in early reading: A review of the direct and indirect access hypothesis. Cognition. 24.93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, C. A. 1985. What do we really know about semantic context effects during reading? In Besner, D., Waller, T. and MacKinnon, G. (eds.) Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Volume 5. New York: Academic Press. 125–166.Google Scholar
Beers, T. 1987. Schema-theoretic models of reading: Humanizing the machine. Reading Research Quarterly. 22.369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. 1983. Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R. and Seergobin, K.. 1990. On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review. 97.432–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biemiller, A. 1970. The development of the use of graphic and contextual information as children learn to read. Reading Research Quarterly. 6.75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biemiller, A. 1977–1978. Relationships between oral reading rates for letters, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly. 13.223–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biemiller, A. 1979. Changes in the use of graphic and contextual information as functions of passage difficulty and reading achievement level. Journal of Reading Behavior. 11.307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blachman, B. A. 1989. Phonological awareness and word recognition: Assessment and intervention. In Kamhi, A. G. and Catts, H. W. (eds.) Reading disabilities. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. 133–158.Google Scholar
Booth, W. C. 1974. Modern dogma and the rhetoric of assent. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bowey, J. A. 1985. Contextual facilitation in children's oral reading in relation to grade and decoding skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 40.23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L. and Bryant, P. E.. 1983. Categorizing sounds and learning to read–a causal connection. Nature. 301.419–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L. and Bryant, P. E.. 1985. Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, P., Austin, S. and Underwood, G.. 1984. The effects of sentence context in good and poor readers: A test of Stanovich's interactive-compensatory model. Reading Research Quarterly. 20.54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. I. 1977. Perception, theory and commitment: The new philosophy of science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bruck, M. 1990. Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology. 26.439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruck, M. and Treiman, R. 1990. Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children and dyslexics: The case of initial consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 50.156–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, P. E., Maclean, M., Bradley, L. and Crossland, J.. 1990. Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology. 26.429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, T. H. and Pollatsek, A.. 1985. Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In Besner, D., Waller, T. G. and MacKinnon, G. E. (eds.) Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Volume 5. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. 1–82.Google Scholar
Caudill, M. and Butler, C.. 1990. Naturally intelligent systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. 1978. Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In Underwood, G. (ed.) Strategies of information proceessing. London: Academic Press. 151–216.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Patterson, K. and Marshall, J. C.. 1980. Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E. 1990. Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 50.429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, A. E., Stanovich, K. E. and Wilson, M. R.. 1990. Cognitive variation in adult students differing in reading ability. In Carr, T. and Levy, B. A. (eds.) Reading and its development: Component skills approaches. San Diego: Academic Press. 129–159.Google Scholar
Curtis, M. 1980. Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology. 72.656–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durgunoglu, A. Y. 1988. Repetition, semantic priming, and stimulus quality: Implications for the interactive-compensatory model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 14.590–603.Google ScholarPubMed
Eagleton, T. 1983. Literary theory:An introduction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. 1989. The development of spelling knowledge and its role in reading acquisition and reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 22.356–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrlich, S. 1981. Children's word recognition in prose context. Visible Language. 15.219–244.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, S. and Rayner, K.. 1981. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 20.641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. A. and Carr, T. H.. 1985. Cognitive abilities, conditions of learning, and the early development of reading skill. Reading Research Quarterly. 20.327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, S. 1980. Is there a text in this class? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1983. Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1985. Precis of the modularity of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 8.1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I. and Chambers, S.. 1973. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 12.627–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, E. 1975. Beyond truth and falsehood. British Journal of Philosophy of Science. 26.331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glushko, R. J. 1979. The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 5.674–691.Google Scholar
Glushko, R. J. 1981. Principles for pronouncing print: The psychology of phonography. In Lesgold, A. and Perfetti, C. (eds.) Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 61–84.Google Scholar
Golden, J. M. 1983. If a text exists without a reader, is there meaning? Insights from literary theory for reader-text interaction. In Hutson, B. A. (ed.) Advances in reading/language research, Volume 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 139–163.Google Scholar
Goodman, K. S. 1967. Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading specialist. 6.126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, K. S. 1968. The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process. In Goodman, K. S. (ed.) The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press. 13–26.Google Scholar
Goodman, K. S. 1976–1977. From the strawman to the tin woodman: A response to Mosenthal. Reading Research Quarterly. 12.575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, K. S. 1981. Letter to the editors. Reading Research Quarterly. 16.477–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, K. S. 1985. Unity is reading. In Singer, H. and Ruddell, R. B. (eds.) Theoretical models and proesses of reading, 3rd ed.Newark, DE: International Reading Association. 813–840.Google Scholar
Gough, P. B. 1972. One second of reading. In Kavanagh, J. and Mattingly, I. (eds.) Language by ear and eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 331–358.Google Scholar
Gough, P. B. 1983. Context, form, and interaction. In Rayner, K. (ed.) Eye movements in reading. New York: Academic Press. 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, P. B. and Cosky, M. J.. 1977. One second of reading again. In Castellan, N. J., Pisoni, D. B. and Potts, G. R. (eds.) Cognitive theory, Volume 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 271–286.Google Scholar
Graff, G. 1979. Literature against itself. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harding, L. M. 1984. Reading errors and style in children with a specific reading disability. Journal of Research in Reading. 7.103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, L. 1981. Information processing approaches to acquired dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 33A. 507–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, L. 1982. Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. 1985. Issues in the modelling of pronunciation assembly in normal reading. In Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C. and Coltheart, M. (eds.) Surface dyslexia. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. 459–508.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. 1987. Word recognition: A tutorial review. In Coltheart, M. (ed.) Attention and performance, Volume 12. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. 171–200.Google Scholar
Hogaboam, T. W. 1983. Reading patterns in eye movement data. In Rayner, K. (ed.) Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes. New York: Academic Press. 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, G. W. and Evett, L. J.. 1985. Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 8.689–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynd, G. W. and Semrud-Clikeman, M.. 1989. Dyslexia and brain morphology. Psychological Bulletin. 106.447–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, P. 1989. Constructive evaluation and the improvement of teaching and learning. Teachers College Record. 90.509–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juel, C. 1980. Comparison of word identification strategies with varying context, word type, and reader skill. Reading Research Quarterly. 15.358–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., and Gough, P. B.. 1986. Acquisition of leteracy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology. 78.243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A.. 1980. A thoery of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review. 4.329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A.. 1987. The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Kibby, M. W. 1979. Passage readability affects the oral reading strategies of disabled readers. The Reading Teacher. 32.390–396.Google Scholar
Kimmel, S. and Macginitie, W. H.. 1984. Identifying children who use a perseverative text processing strategy. Research Quarterly. 19.162–172.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. 1988. The rolw of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review. 95.163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. and Mross, E.. 1985. Context effects in word identification. Journal of Memory and Language. 24.336–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, A. F. and Donchin, E.. 1987. Brain potentials as indices of orthographic and phonological interaction during word matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 13.76–86.Google ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S. A.. 1980. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science. 207.203–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S. A. 1983. Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory and Cognition. 11.539–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaBerge, D. and Samuels, S.. 1974. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology. 6.293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, D. 1991. Signs of the times: Deconstruction and the fall of Paul de Man. New York: Poseidon Press.Google Scholar
Lesgold, A., Resnick, L. and Hammond, K.. 1985. Learning to read: A longitudinal study of word skill development in two curricula. In Mackinnon, G. and Waller, T. (eds.) Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Volume 4. London: Academic Press. 107–138.Google Scholar
Leu, D. 1982. Oral reading error analysis: A critical review of research and application. Reading Research Quarterly. 17.420–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leu, D., Degroff, L. and Simons, H. D.. 1986. Predictable texts and interactive-compensatory hypotheses: Evaluating individual differences in reading ability, context use, and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. 78.347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lie, A. 1991. Effects of a training program for stimulating skills in word analysis in first-grave children. Reading Research Quarterly. 26.234–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, M. W. 1986. Sentential structure and the perceptual spans of two samples of disabled readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 15.153–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundberg, I., Frost, J. and Peterson, O.. 1988. Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly. 23.263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, M., Bryant, P. and Bradley, L.. 1987. Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 33.255–281.Google Scholar
Maria, K. and Macginitie, W. H.. 1982. Reading comprehension disabilities: Knowledge structures and non-accommodating text processing strategies. Annals of Dyslexia. 32.33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, M. 1986. Comprehension of rapidly presented sentences: The mind is quicker than the eye. Journal of Memory and Language. 25.588–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, M. 1988. The interaction of sentence context and perceptual analysis in word identification. Memory and Cognition. 16.489–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E.. 1981. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review. 88.375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Volume 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McConkie, G. W. and Zola, D.. 1981. Language constraints and the functional stimulus in reading. In Lesgold, A. M. and Perfetti, C. A. (eds.) Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 155–175.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W. and Ruddy, M. G.. 1974. Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition. 2.309–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. R. and Coleman, E. B.. 1967. A set of thirty-six prose passages calibrated for complexity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour. 6.851–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morais, J., Alegria, J. and Content, A.. 1987. The relationships between segmental analysis and alphabetic literacy: An interactive view. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive. 7.415–438.Google Scholar
Nicholson, T. and Hill, D.. 1985. Good readers don't guess—taking another look at the issue of whether children read words better in context or in isolation. Reading Psychology. 6.181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, T. and Hill, D., Lillas, C. and Rzoska, M.. 1988. Have we been misled by miscues? The Reading Teacher. 42.6–10.Google Scholar
Norris, D. 1990. Connectonism: A case for modularity. In Balota, D., D'arcais, G. Flores and Rayner, K. (eds.) Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 331–343.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. 1986. Mining the human sciences: Some relations between hermeneutics and epistemology. Interchange. 17.159‐171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Conners, F. and Rack, J.. 1990. Organization, heritability, and remediation of component word recognition and language skills in disabled readers. In Carr, T. and Levy, B. A. (eds.) Reading and its development: Component skills approaches. New York: Academic Press. 261–322.Google Scholar
Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Connor, F., Rack, J. and Fulker, D.. 1989. Specific dificits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 22.339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E. and Schvaneveldt, R. W.. 1982. An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review. 89.573–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paris, S. G. 1987. Introduction to current issues in reading comprehension. Educational Psychologist. 22.209–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y. and Wixson, K. K.. 1983. Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary educational Psychology. 8.293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, K., and Coltheart, V.. 1987. Phonological processes in reading: A tutorial review. In Coltheart, M. (ed.) Attention and performance, Volume 12. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. 421–447.Google Scholar
Patterson, K., and Coltheart, V., Marshall, J. and Coltheart, M. (eds.) 1985. Surface dyslexia. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Patterson, K., and Coltheart, V., Morton, J.. 1985. From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C. and Coltheart, M. (eds.) Surface dyslexia. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. 335–359.Google Scholar
Patterson, K., and Coltheart, V., Seidenberg, M. S. and McClelland, J.. 1989. Connections and disconnections: Acquired dyslexia in a computational model of reading processes. In Morris, P. (ed.) Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 131–181.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F. 1986. Issues in the diagnosis and phenotype analysis of dyslexia: Implications for family studies. In Smith, S. D. (ed.) Genetics and learning disabilities. San Diego: College-Hill Press. 69–96.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. 1985. Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. 1991. The psychology, pedagogy, and politics of reading. Psychological Science. 2.70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Bell, L. C. and Delaney, S. M.. 1988. Automatic (Prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language. 27.59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. and McCutchen, D.. 1987. Schooled language competence: Linguistic abilities in reading and writing. In Rosenberg, S. (ed.) Advances in applied psycholinguistics, volume 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambrdige University Press. 105–141.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. and Roth, S.. 1981. Some of the interactive processes in reading and their role in reading skill. In Lesgold, A. and Perfetti, C. (eds.) Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 269–297.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. C. 1983. After the wake: Postpositivist educational thought. Educational Researcher. 12.5.4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. C. 1987. Philosophy, science, and social inquiry. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K. and Balota, D. A.. 1986. Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception and Psychophysics. 40.123–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pring, L. and Snowling, M.. 1986. Developmental changes in word recognition: An information-processing account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 38A. 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1981. Philosophers and human understanding. In Heath, A. F. (ed.) Scientific explanation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 99–120.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1983. Realism and reason: Philosophical papers, Volume 3. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1990. Realism with a human face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, E., Dibenedetto, B. and Adler, A.. 1982. Use of the decoding skills test to study differences between good and poor readers. In Gadow, K. and Bialer, I. (eds.) Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities, Volume 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 25–74.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1982. Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, H. and Aborn, M.. 1958. Learning, Prediction, and readability. Journal of Applied Psychology. 42.28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. 1977. Toward an interactive model of reading. In Dornic, S. (ed.) Attention and Performance, Volume 6. New York: Academic Press. 573–603.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L.. 1982. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review. 89.60–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. 1986. Parallel distributed processing Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Volume 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabol, M. A. and DeRosa, D. V.. 1976. Semantic encoding of isolated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 2.58–68.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. 1987. Connectionism: Is it a paradigm shift for psychology? Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 19.73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schustack, M. W., Ehrlich, S. F. and Rayner, K.. 1987. Local and global sources of contextual facilitation in readng. Journal of Memory and Language. 26.322–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwantes, F. M. 1985. Expectancy, integration, and interactional processes: Age differences in the nature of words affected by sentence context. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 39.212–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, R. M. and Stanovich, K. E.. 1981. Flexibility in the use of graphic and contextual information by good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior. 13.263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. 1985. The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition. In Besner, D., Waller, T. and Mackinnon, G. (eds.) Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Volume 5. New York: Academic Press. 199–252.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. 1988. Cognitive neuropsychology and language: The state of the art. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 5.403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. and McClelland, J. L.. 1989. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review. 96.523–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sejnowski, T. J. and Rosenberg, C. R.. 1988. Learning and representation in connectionist models. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.) Perspectives in memory research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 135–178.Google Scholar
Sharon, A. T. 1973–1974. what do adults read? Reading Research Quarterly. 9.148–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, H. 1980. Objectivity, rationality, incommensurability and more. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 31.359–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, H. 1987. Relativism refuted: A critique of contemporary epistemological relativism. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, H. D. and Leu, D. J.. 1987. The use of contextual and graphic information in word recognition by second-, fourth-, and sixth-grade readers. Journal of Reading Behavior. 19.33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. B. and Foster, M. R.. 1986. Lexical ambiguity and children's word recognition. Developmental Psychology. 22.147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. B. and Foster, M. R., Lorsbach, T. and Whitehouse, D.. 1983. Encoding and contextual components of word recognition in good and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 35.161–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, F. 1971. Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winsto.Google Scholar
Smith, F. 1973. Psycholinguistics and reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Spiro, R. J., Bruce, B. C. and Brewer, W. F.. (eds.) 1980. Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. 1980. Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly. 16.32–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. 1986. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly. 21.360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (ed.) 1988. Children's reading and the development of phonological awareness. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. 1990. Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review. 10.72–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. 1991. Word recognition: Changing perspectives. In Barr, R., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. and Pearson, P. D. (eds.) Handbook of reading research, Volume 2. New York: Longman. 418–452.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. and Cunningham, A. E.. 1991. Reading as constrained reasoning. In Sternberg, S. and Frensch, P. (eds.) Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 3–60.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. and Freeman, D. J.. 1984a. Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly. 19.278–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. and Cunningham, A. E. and Freeman, D. J. 1984b. Relation between early reading acquisition and word decoding with and without context: A longitudinal study of first–grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology. 76.668–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., Nathan, R. G., West, R. F. and Vala-Rossi, M.. 1985. Children– word recognition in context: Spreading activation, expectancy and modularity. Child Development. 56.1418–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. and West, R. F.. 1983a. On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 112.1–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K. E. and West, R. F. 1983b. The generalizability of context effects on word recognition: A reconsideration of the roles of parafoveal priming and sentence context. Memory and Cognition. 11.49–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K. E. and Feeman, D. J.. 1981. A longitudinal study of sentence context effects in second-grade children: Tests of an interactive-compensatory model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 32.185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stove, D. 1982. Popper and after. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. 1989. Toward a unified theory of literacy learning and instructional practices. Phi Delta Kappan. 71.3.184–193.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. 1917. Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. Journal of Educational Psychology. 8.323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, R. L. 1973–1974. Reading as reasoning. Reading Research Quarterly. 9.135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R. and Baron, J.. 1983. Phonemic-analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules. Memory and Cognition. 11.382–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Orden, G. 1987. A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory and Cognition. 15.181–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Orden, G., Johnston, J. and Hale, B.. 1988. Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 14.371–386.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Petten, C. and Kutas, M.. 1987. Ambiguous words in context: An event related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation. Journal of Memory and Language. 26.188–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F. and Scanlon, D.. 1987. Phonological coding, Phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 33.321–363.Google Scholar
Venezky, R. L. 1982. The origins of the present-day chasm between adult literacy needs and school literacy instruction. visible Language. 16.113–126.Google Scholar
Venezky, R. L., Wagner, D. A. and Ciliberti, B. S.. (eds.) 1990. Toward defining literacy. Newark, DE: International reading Association.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K. and Torgesen, J. K.. 1987. The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin. 101.192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C. 1989. The basalization of America: A cause for concern. In Weaver, C. and Groff, P. (eds.) Two reactions to the Report Card on Basal Readers. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills. 4–7, 14–22, 33–37.Google Scholar
West, R. F. and Stanovich, K. E.. 1978. Automatic contextual facilitation in readers of three ages. Child Development. 49.717–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whaley, J. and Kibby, M.. 1981. The relative importance of reliance on intraword characteristics and interword constraints for beginning reading achievement. Journal of Educational Research. 74.315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willinsky, J. 1990. The new literacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wixson, K. L. 1979. Miscue analysis: A critical review. Journal of Reading Behavior. 11.163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wixson, K. K. and Peters, C. W.. 1987. Comprehension assessment: Implementing an interactive view of reading. Educational Psychologist. 22.333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zola, D. 1984. Redundancy and word perception during reading. Perception and Psychopysics. 36.277–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed