Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T20:46:20.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ACROSS THE HELLESPONT: MAYDOS (ANCIENT MADYTOS), TROY AND THE NORTH-EASTERN AEGEAN IN THE LATE EIGHTH TO EARLY SIXTH CENTURY BC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Carolyn C. Aslan  and
Göksel Sazcı
Carolyn C. Aslan*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and History of Art, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
Göksel Sazcı
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey
*
caslan@ku.edu.tr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents new excavation results from three oval or apsidal houses discovered at the site of Maydos-Kilisetepe (ancient Madytos), which is located near the coast of the Hellespont on the Gallipoli peninsula. The houses date to the late eighth to early sixth century bc. The material from Maydos is evaluated in comparison with the nearby site of Troy (Ilion) and situated within the wider context of developments in the north-eastern Aegean region during the Late Geometric to Early Archaic periods. From the mid-eighth to the mid-seventh century, a cultural koine existed in the north-eastern Aegean, shown by the strong similarities in material culture among the sites in the region. Troy was most probably a large regional centre, while Maydos functioned as a smaller settlement within this network. The power and influence of this koine declined or was replaced in the mid-seventh century, when there was a sudden influx of Ionian-style ceramics at Maydos, around the same time that Troy experienced a destruction. The patterns of cultural interactions changed with the establishment of Greek (primarily Ionian and Athenian) colonies on both sides of the Hellespont during the second half of the seventh to the early sixth century.

Διασχίζοντας τον Ελλήσποντο: η Μάυδος (αρχαία Μάδυτος), η Τροία και το Βορειο-ανατολικό Αιγαίο από τον ύστερο 8ο μέχρι τον πρώιμο 6ο αιώνα π.Χ.

Το άρθρο αυτό παρουσιάζει τα αποτελέσματα των τελευταίων ανασκαφών τριών αψιδοειδών οικιών στην περιοχή Μάυδος-Κιλισετεπέ (αρχαία Μάδυτος), που βρίσκεται κοντά στην ακτή του Ελλησπόντου στην χερσόνησο της Καλλίπολης. Οι οικίες χρονολογούνται κατά την περίοδο μεταξύ του τέλους του 8ου και των αρχών του 6ου αιώνα π.Χ. Το υλικό από την Μάδυτο συγκρίνεται με το υλικό από τη γειτονική Τροία (Ίλιον) και τοποθετείται στο ευρύτερο πλαίσιο των εξελίξεων στο βορειο-ανατολικό Αιγαίο την Ύστερη Γεωμετρική και Πρώιμη Αρχαϊκή περίοδο. Από τα μέσα του 8ου μέχρι τα μέσα του 7ου αιώνα, υπήρχε στο βορειο-ανατολικό Αιγαίο ένα κοινό πολιτισμικό πλαίσιο, όπως φαίνεται από τις σημαντικές ομοιότητες στα ανασκαφικά δεδομένα της περιοχής. Η Τροία ήταν πιθανώς ένα μεγάλο περιφερειακό κέντρο, ενώ η Μάδυτος λειτουργούσε ως ένας μικρός οικισμός σε αυτό το δίκτυο. Η δύναμη και η επιρροή αυτού του κοινού πολιτισμικού πλαισίου παρήκμασε, ή αντικαταστήθηκε, στα μέσα του 7ου αιώνα, όταν υπήρξε μια ξαφνική εισροή Ιωνικής κεραμεικής στην Μάυδο, η οποία χρονολογείται την ίδια περίπου εποχή με μια από τις καταστροφές της Τροίας. Οι μορφές των πολιτισμικών αλληλεπιδράσεων άλλαξε με την ίδρυση ελληνικών (κυριώς Ιωνικών και Αθηναϊκών) αποικιών και στις δύο πλευρές του Ελλησπόντου κατά τη διάρκεια της περιόδου από το δεύτερο μισό του 7ου μέχρι τον πρώιμο 6ο αιώνα.

Μετάφραση: Χ. Κωνσταντακοπούλου

Type
Articles
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , Volume 111 , November 2016 , pp. 121 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akurgal, E. 1983. Eski Izmir I: Yerleşme Katları ve Athena Tapınağı (Ankara).Google Scholar
Arslan, N. and Sevinç, N. 2003. ‘Die eisenzeitlichen Gräber von Tenedos’, IstMitt 53, 223–50.Google Scholar
Aslan, C.C. 2002. ‘Ilion before Alexander: Protogeometric, Geometric, and Archaic pottery from D9’, Studia Troica 12, 81–129.Google Scholar
Aslan, C.C. 2009a. ‘New evidence for a destruction at Troia in the mid 7th century B.C.’, Studia Troica 18, 33–58.Google Scholar
Aslan, C.C. 2009b. ‘Grey ware at Troy in the Protogeometric through Archaic periods’, in Avram, A. (ed.), Pontica XLII Supplement I: Pontic Grey Wares, International Conference, Bucarest–Constantza 2008 (Constantza, Romania), 267–83.Google Scholar
Aslan, C.C. 2009c. ‘Swan imagery at the West Sanctuary at Troia’, in Aygün, Ç.Ö. (ed.), SOMA 2007: Proceedings of the XI Symposium on Mediterranean Archaeology, Istanbul Technical University, 24–29 April 2007 (BAR International Series 1900; Oxford), 54–60.Google Scholar
Aslan, C.C. 2011. ‘A place of burning: hero or ancestor cult at Troy’, Hesperia 80, 381–429.Google Scholar
Aslan, C.C. and Hnila, P. 2015. ‘Migration and integration at Troy from the end of the Late Bronze Age to the Iron Age’, in Stampolidis, N., Maner, Ç. and Kopanias, K. (eds), Nostoi: Indigenous Culture, Migration and Integration in the Aegean Islands and Western Anatolia during the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages (Istanbul), 185–209.Google Scholar
Aslan, C.C., Kealhofer, L. and Grave, P. 2014. ‘The early Iron Age at Troy reconsidered’, OJA 33, 275–312.Google Scholar
Aslan, C.C. and Pernicka, E. 2013. ‘Wild goat style ceramics at Troy and the impact of Archaic period colonization on the Troad’, AnatSt 63, 35–53.Google Scholar
Aslan, C.C. and Rose, C.B. 2013. ‘City and citadel at Troy from the Late Bronze Age through the Roman period’, in Redford, S. and Ergin, N. (eds), Cities and Citadels in Turkey: from the Iron Age to the Seljuks (Ancient Near Eastern Studies Supplement Series Vol. 40; Leuven), 7–38.Google Scholar
Aslan, C.C., Thys-Şenocak, L. and Çelik, R.N. 2008. ‘Gelibolu yarımadası tarihsel savaş alanı arkeolojisi araştırmaları: Seddülbahir Kalesi projesi (Research of the historical and battlefield archaeology of the Gallipoli peninsula: the Ottoman fortress at Seddülbahir)’, Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology (TÜBA-AR) 11, 105–20.Google Scholar
Aytaçlar, M.N. and Kozanlı, C. 2012. ‘Hellespontos işliği ve Parion buluntuları’, Olba 20, 27–117.Google Scholar
Bammer, A. 1982. ‘Forschungen im Artemision von Ephesos von 1976 bis 1981’, AnatSt 32, 61–87.Google Scholar
Başaran, C., Keleş, V., Kasapoğlu, H. and Ergürer, H.E. 2012. ‘Parion 2010 kazı ve restorasyon çalışmaları’, Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 33, 19–38.Google Scholar
Basedow, M. 2007. ‘Troy without Homer: the Bronze Age – Iron Age transition in the Troad’, in Morris, S.P. and Laffineur, R. (eds), EPOS. Reconsidering Greek Epic and Aegean Bronze Age Archaeology (Aegaeum 28; Liège), 49–58.Google Scholar
Basedow, M. 2009. ‘The Iron Age transition at Troy’, in Bachhuber, C. and Roberts, R.G. (eds), Forces of Transformation: the End of the Bronze Age in the Mediterranean, Themes from the Ancient Near East (BANEA Publication Series Volume 1; Oxford), 131–42.Google Scholar
Bates, W.N. 1916. ‘Archaeological news’, AJA 20, 357–81.Google Scholar
Bates, W.N. 1920. ‘Archaeological news’, AJA 24, 85–119.Google Scholar
Bayne, N. 2000. The Grey Wares of North-West Anatolia: in the Middle and Late Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age and their Relation to the Early Greek Settlements (Bonn).Google Scholar
Becks, R., Rigter, W. and Hnila, P. 2006. ‘Das Terrassenhaus im westlichen unterstadtviertel von Troia’, Studia Troica 16, 27–88.Google Scholar
Bernard, P. 1964. ‘Céramiques de la première moitié de VII siècle à Thasos’, BCH 88, 77–146.Google Scholar
Beschi, L. 2003. ‘Ceramiche Arcaiche di Lemno: alcuni problemi’, ASAtene 81, 303–49.Google Scholar
Bieg, G. and Aslan, R. 2006. ‘Eine quellhöhle in Spratts plateau (Subaşı Tepe) – Wo lag Sigeion?’, Studia Troica 16, 133–45.Google Scholar
Blegen, C.W., Boulter, C.G., Caskey, J.L. and Rawson, M. 1958. Troy IV. Settlements VIIa, VIIb and VIII (Princeton).Google Scholar
Chamonard, J., Dhorme, E. and Courby, F. 1915. ‘Corps expeditionnaire d'Orient. fouilles archéologiques sur l'emplacement de la nécropole d’Éléonte de Thrace’, BCH 39, 135–240.Google Scholar
Coldstream, J.N. 2008. Greek Geometric Pottery: a Survey of Ten Local Styles and their Chronology, revised edn (Exeter).Google Scholar
Cook, J.M. 1973. The Troad: an Archaeological and Topographical Study (Oxford).Google Scholar
Cook, R.M. and Dupont, P. 1998. East Greek Pottery (New York).Google Scholar
Danile, L. 2008a. ‘La ceramica grigia di Lemno: osservazioni preliminari’, in Greco, E. (ed.), ‘Hesphaestia 2005’, ASAtene 83, 958–66.Google Scholar
Danile, L. 2008b. ‘La cultura materiale tra la fine dell'età del Bronzo e gli inizi dell'età del Ferro’, in Emanuele, G. and Papi, E. (eds), Hephaestia 2000–2006 (Athens), 39–53.Google Scholar
Danile, L. 2011. La Ceramica Grigia di Efestia Dagli Inizi dell'età del Ferro all'età alto-Arcaica. Lemno, 2. Scavi ad Efestia 1 (Monografie della Scuola Archeologica di Atene e delle Missioni Italiane in Oriente XX, 2/1; Athens).Google Scholar
Danile, L. 2012a. ‘Area 26: I materiali Arcaici’, ASAtene 88 (2010, III, 10), 17–37.Google Scholar
Danile, L. 2012b. ‘Local productions and imports at Hephaestia (Lemnos) from the early Iron Age to the Archaic period’, in Tiverios, E., Missailidou-Despotidou, V., Manakidou, M. and Arvanitaki, A. (eds), Archaic Pottery of the Northern Aegean and its Periphery (700–480 B.C.). Proceedings of the Archaeological Meeting, Thessaloniki, 2011 (Thessaloniki), 79–90.Google Scholar
Demangel, R. 1926. Le tumulus dit de Protesilas (Paris).Google Scholar
Dörpfeld, W. 1902. Troja und Ilion: Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen in den Vorhistorischen und Historischen Schichten von Ilion 1870–1894 (Athens).Google Scholar
Dupont, P. 2008. ‘“Ionie du Sud 3”: un centre producteur des confins de la Grèce de l'est et du Pont-Euxin?’, Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia 14, 1–24.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, N. 1988. Milet und seine Kolonien: Vergleichende Untersuchung der Kultischen und Politischen Einrichtungen (Frankfurt).Google Scholar
Ersoy, Y. 2004. ‘Klazomenai: 900–500 bc. History and settlement evidence’, in Moustaka, A., Skarlatidou, E., Tzannes, M.-C. and Ersoy, Y. (eds), Klazomenai, Teos and Abdera. Metropoleis and Colony: Proceedings of the International Symposium Held at the Archaeological Museum of Abdera (Thessaloniki), 43–76.Google Scholar
Fagerström, K. 1988. Greek Iron Age Architecture: Developments through Changing Times (SIMA 81; Gothenburg).Google Scholar
Ficuciello, L. 2010. ‘Lemno in età arcaica’, ASAtene 88 (2010, III, 10), 39–84.Google Scholar
Fisher, S.M. 1996. ‘Troian “G2/3 ware” revisited’, Studia Troica 6, 119–32.Google Scholar
Fisher, S.M. 2000. ‘Ceramics and culture: the Archaic finewares of Ilion’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cincinnati).Google Scholar
Graham, A.J. 1978. ‘The foundation of Thasos’, BSA 73, 61–98.Google Scholar
Hertel, D. 2008a. Das Frühe Ilion: die Besiedlung Troias durch die Griechen (1020–650/25 v.Chr.) (Munich).Google Scholar
Hertel, D. 2008b. ‘Die frühe griechische Keramik in der Berliner sammlung (1020–650/625 bzw. 600/550)’, in Wemhoff, M., Hertel, D. and Hansel, A. (eds), Heinrich Schliemanns Sammlung Trojanischer Altertümer – Neuvorlage Bd. 1 (Berliner Beiträge zur vor-und Frühgeschichte, Neue Folge Band 14; Berlin), 93–174.Google Scholar
Hnila, P. 2012. ‘The pottery of Troy VIIb. Chronology, classification, context and implications of Trojan ceramic assemblages in the Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age transition’ (PhD thesis, Tübingen University). (Available online <http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/volltexte/2012/6229/> accessed August 2015.)+accessed+August+2015.)>Google Scholar
Ilieva, P. 2007. ‘Thracian–Greek symbiosis on the shore of the Aegean’, in Thrace in the Graeco-Roman World. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Thracology, Komotini-Alexandroupolis, 18–23 October 2005 (Athens), 212–26.Google Scholar
Ilieva, P. 2009. ‘“G 2–3 ware” and the non-Greek populations on the north Aegean coast (some preliminary notes on its distribution patterns and contextual characteristics)’, in Bonias, Z.E. and Perreault, J.Y. (eds), Greeks and Thracians in Coastal and Inland Thrace during the Years before and after the Great Colonization. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Thasos, 26–27 September 2008 (Thasos), 109–21.Google Scholar
Ilieva, P. 2011. ‘The sessile kantharos of the Archaic northeast Aegean ceramic assemblage: the Anatolian connection’, Studia Troica 19, 179–203.Google Scholar
Ilieva, P. 2013a. ‘G 2–3 ware: the Sub(proto)geometric tradition of the northeastern Aegean’, in Adam-Veleni, P., Kefalidou, E. and Tsiafaki, E. (eds), Pottery Workshops in Northeastern Aegean (8th–early 5th c. B.C.) (Thessaloniki), 123–31.Google Scholar
Ilieva, P. 2013b. ‘Archaic wheelmade ceramics from the cave of Maroneia and Kremasto (Asar Tepe), Aegean Thrace’, BSA 108, 137–85.Google Scholar
Ilieva, P. 2014. ‘Regional standardization and local variation: the case of the north Aegean G 2–3 ware’, in Kotsonas, A. (ed.), Understanding Standardization and Variation in Mediterranean Ceramics: mid 2nd to late 1st millennium bc (Leuven), 85–96.Google Scholar
Ilieva, P., Tsiafaki, D., Tsirliganis, N., Sakalis, A. and Kazakis, N. 2014. ‘G 2–3 ware from the north Aegean basin: results from an archaeometric research 2008 – 2011’, Το Αρχαιολογικό Έργο στη Μακεδονία και Θράκη 24, 2010 (Thessaloniki), 565–74.Google Scholar
Isaac, B. 1986. The Greek Settlements in Thrace until the Macedonian Conquest (Leiden).Google Scholar
Jones, H.L. 1924. Strabo. Geography, Books 6 and 7. (Cambridge, MA; London).Google Scholar
Kadıoğlu, M., Özbil, C., Kerschner, M. and Mommsen, H. 2015. ‘Teos im Licht der neuen Forschungen’, in Yalçin, Ü. and Bienert, H.-D. (eds), Anatolien – Brücke der Kulturen, der Anschnitt Beiheft 27 (Bochum), 345–66.Google Scholar
Karadima, C., Matsas, D., Blondé, F. and Picon, M. 2002. ‘Workshop references and clay surveying in Samothrace: an application to the study of the origin of some ceramic groups’, in Kilikoglou, V., Hein, A. and Maniatis, Y. (eds), Modern Trends in Scientific Studies on Ancient Ceramics (BAR International Series 1011; Oxford), 157–60.Google Scholar
Kerschner, M. 1995. ‘Die ostgriechischen Vogelschalen und Verwandtes. Studien zu Chronologie und Verbreitung der ostgriechschen Keramik’ (unpublished PhD thesis, Bochum University).Google Scholar
Kerschner, M. 1997. ‘Ein stratifizierter opferkomplex des 7. Jh.s v. Chr. aus dem Artemision von Ephesos’, Öjh 66, 85–226.Google Scholar
Kerschner, M. 2006a. ‘Zum Beginn und zu den Phasen der griechischen Kolonisation am Schwarzen Meer: die evidenz der ostgriechischen Keramik’, Eurasia Antiqua: Zeitschrift für Archäologie Eurasiens 12, 227–50.Google Scholar
Kerschner, M. 2006b. ‘Zur Herkunftsbestimmung archaischer ostgriechischer Keramik: die Funde aus Berezan im Akademischen Kunstmuseum der Universität Bonn und im Robertinum der Universität Halle-Wittenberg’, IstMitt 56, 129–55.Google Scholar
Kerschner, M. 2014. ‘Euboean imports to the eastern Aegean and eastern Aegean production of pottery in the Euboean style: new evidence from neutron activation analyses’, in Kerschner, M. and Lemos, I.S. (eds), Archaeometric Analyses of Euboean and Euboean Related Pottery: New Results and their Interpretations. Proceedings of the Round Table Conference held at the Austrian Archaeological Institute in Athens 15 and 16 April 2011, ErghÖJh 15 (Vienna), 109–40.Google Scholar
Kerschner, M., Mommsen, H., Beier, T., Heimermann, D. and Hein, A. 1993. ‘Neutron activation analysis of bird bowls and related Archaic ceramics from Miletus’, Archaeometry 35, 197–210.Google Scholar
Kleine, J. 1979. ‘Milet: Bericht über die Arbeiten im Südschnitt an der Hellenistischen Stadtmauer 1968–1973’, IstMitt 29, 109–59.Google Scholar
Korenjak, M. 2003. Die Weit-Rundreise eines Anonymen Friechieschen Autors (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
Körpe, R. and Yavuz, M. 2009a. ‘The location of Aigospotamoi’, in Aygün, Ç (ed.), SOMA 2007 Proceedings of the XI Symposium on Mediterranean Archaeology, Istanbul Technical University, 24 and 29 April 2007 (BAR International Series 1900; Oxford), 226–9.Google Scholar
Körpe, R. and Yavuz, M. 2009b. ‘Sigeion and its foundation’, in Aygün, Ç. (ed.), SOMA 2007 Proceedings of the XI Symposium on Mediterranean Archaeology, Istanbul Technical University, 24 and 29 April 2007 (BAR International Series 1900; Oxford), 230–2.Google Scholar
Lamb, W. 1931/2. ‘Antissa’, BSA 32, 41–67.Google Scholar
Lamb, W. 1932. ‘Grey wares from Lesbos’, JHS 52, 1–12.Google Scholar
Leaf, W. 1923. Strabo on the Troad (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Lemos, I.S. 1998. ‘Euboea and its Aegean koine’, in Bats, M. and D'Agostino, B. (eds), Euboica, L'Eubea e la Presenza Euboica in Calcidica e in Occidente (Naples), 45–58.Google Scholar
Lenz, D., Ruppenstein, F., Baumann, M. and Catling, R. 1998. ‘Protogeometric pottery at Troia’, Studia Troica 8, 189–222.Google Scholar
Loukopoulou, L. 2004. ‘Thracian Chersonesos’, in Hansen, M.H. and Nielsen, T.H. (eds), An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis (Oxford), 900–11.Google Scholar
Mazarakis Ainian, A. 1997. From Rulers’ Dwellings to Temples. Architecture, Religion and Society in Early Iron Age Greece (1100–700 B.C.) (SIMA 121; Jonsered).Google Scholar
Messineo, G. 2001. Efestia: Scavi Adriani 1928–1930 (Monografie della Scuola Archeologica di Athene e delle Missioni Italiane in Oriente XIII; Padua).Google Scholar
Mommsen, H., Cowell, M.R., Fletcher, Ph., Hook, D., Schlotzhauer, U., Villing, A., Weber, S. and Williams, D. 2006. ‘Neutron activation analysis of pottery from Naukratis and other related vessels’, in Villing, A. and Schlotzhauer, U. (eds), Naukratis: Greek Diversity in Egypt: Studies on East Greek Pottery and Exchange in the Eastern Mediterranean (London), 69–76.Google Scholar
Mommsen, H., Hertel, D. and Mountjoy, P.A. 2001. ‘Neutron activation analysis of the pottery from Troy in the Berlin Schliemann collection’, AA, 169–211.Google Scholar
Mommsen, H., Kerschner, M. and Posamentir, R. 2006. ‘Provenance determination of 111 pottery samples from Berezan by neutron activation analysis’, IstMitt 56, 157–68.Google Scholar
Moore, M.B. 1982. ‘Ceramics. The fill of the temenos and the terrace’, in Lehmann, P.W. and Spittle, D. (eds), Samothrace: the Temenos (Princeton), 317–82.Google Scholar
Mountjoy, P.A. 1998. ‘The east Aegean–west Anatolian interface in the Late Bronze Age: Mycenaeans and the kingdom of Ahhiyawa’, AnatSt 48, 33–67.Google Scholar
Özbek, O. 2000. ‘Gelibolu yarimadasinin kuzerinde yeni bir prehistorik tas balta atölyesi’, Türk Arkeologi ve Etnografya Dergisi 1, 1–4.Google Scholar
Özbek, O. 2008. ‘Gelibolu yarımadası güneyindeki bazı höyüklerin son araştırmalar ışığında yeniden değerlendirilmesi (A reassessment of the prehistoric mounds on the south of Gallipoli peninsula)’, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Dergisi 127, 1–14.Google Scholar
Özbek, O. 2009. ‘2007 yılı Gelibolu yarımadası prehistorik dönem yüzey araştırması (Prehistoric period survey of the Gallipoli peninsula in 2007)’, Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 26, 367–82.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M. 1986. ‘Prehistoric sites in the Gelibolu peninsula’, Anadolu Arastirmalari 10, 51–67.Google Scholar
Page, D. 1955. Sappho and Alcaeus: an Introduction to the Study of Ancient Lesbian Poetry (Oxford).Google Scholar
Pavúk, P. 2002. ‘Troia VI and VIIa. The Blegen pottery shapes: towards a typology’, Studia Troica 12, 35–71.Google Scholar
Polat, Y. 2002. ‘Daskyleion'da M.Ö. 8.–5. Yüzyıllar Arasında Gri Seramik’ (unpublished PhD thesis, Ege University).Google Scholar
Polat, Y. 2008. ‘M.Ö. 1. Bin batı Anadolu gri tek renkli seramiği ve kökenine dair düşünceler’, Anatolia supplement series 2: III.–IV. Ulusal Arkeolojik Araştırmalar Sempozyumu (Ankara), 281–94.Google Scholar
Polat, G. and Polat, Y. 2006. ‘Antandros 2003–2004 yılı kazıları’, Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 27, 89–104.Google Scholar
Polat, G. and Polat, Y. 2007. ‘Antandros nekropolü 2001–2006 yılları ön raporu (Preliminary report of Antandros necropolis, 2001–2006 excavation seasons)’, Arkeoloji Dergisi 9, 1–20.Google Scholar
Posamentir, R., Arslan, N., Bîrzescu, J., Karagöz, Ş. and Mommsen, H. 2009, ‘Zur Herkunftsbestimmung archaisch-ionischer Keramik III: Funde aus den Hellespontstädten, Histria und Olbia’, IstMitt 59, 35–50.Google Scholar
Posamentir, R. and Solovyov, S. 2006. ‘Zur Herkunftsbestimmung archaisch-ostgriechischer Keramik: die Funde aus Berezan in Eremitage von St. Petersburg’, IstMitt 56, 103–28.Google Scholar
Posamentir, R. and Solovyov, S. 2007. ‘Zur Herkunftsbestimmung archaisch-ionischer Keramik: die Funde aus Berezan in der Eremitage von St. Petersburg II’, IstMitt 57, 179–207.Google Scholar
Rizzo, M. 2001. ‘Ceramica rodia’, in Messineo, G. Efestia: Scavi Adriani 1928–1930 (Monografie della Scuola Archeologica di Athene e delle Missioni Italiane in Oriente XIII; Padua), 302–3.Google Scholar
Rose, C.B. 2008. ‘Separating fact from fiction in the Aiolian Migration’, Hesperia 77, 399–430.Google Scholar
Rose, C.B. 2014. The Archaeology of Greek and Roman Troy (New York).Google Scholar
Sazcı, G. 2012. ‘Maydos Kilisetepe höyüğü 2010 yılı kazıları’, Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 33(1), 389–408.Google Scholar
Sazcı, G. 2013a. ‘Maydos Kilisetepe höyüğü – eine bronzezeitliche hafensiedlung an den Dardanellen’, ArchKorrBl 43, 29–40.Google Scholar
Sazcı, G. 2013b. ‘Maydos Kilisetepe höyüğü kazısı 2011 sezonu çalısmaları’, Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 34, 45–64.Google Scholar
Sazcı, G. 2014. ‘Maydos Kilisetepe höyüğü kazısı 2012 sezonu çalısmaları’, Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 35, 33–47.Google Scholar
Sazcı, G. 2015. ‘Maydos Kilisetepe höyüğü kazısı 2013 sezonu çalısmaları’, Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 36, 319–34.Google Scholar
Schäfer, T. 2009. ‘Sigeion yüzey araştırmaları 2005–2007’, 26 Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 26, 1–12.Google Scholar
Schäfer, T. 2011. ‘Sigeion, Troas bericht über die 1. Grabungskampagne 2009’, Kazı Sonunçuları Toplantısı 32, 407–20.Google Scholar
Schattner, T.G. 2007. Didyma vol. 4: Die Fundkeramik vom 8. bis zum 4. Jahrhundert v. Chr. (Mainz).Google Scholar
Schiering, W. 1989. ‘Pyrrha auf Lesbos: Nachlese einer Grabung’, AA, 339–77.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. 1902a. Heinrich Schliemann's Sammlung Trojanischer Altertümer (Berlin).Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. 1902b. ‘Die Keramik der verschiedenen Schichten’, in Dörpfeld, W., Troja und Ilion. Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen in den Vorhistorischen und Historischen Schichten von Ilion 1870–1894 (Athens), 243–319.Google Scholar
Spencer, N. 1995. ‘Early Lesbos between east and west: a ‘grey area’ of Aegean archaeology’, BSA 90, 269–306.Google Scholar
Tavukçu, Z.A. 2006. ‘Parion nekropolü 2005 yılı buluntuları’ (unpublished PhD thesis, Atatürk University).Google Scholar
Tenger, B. 1999. ‘Zur geographie und geschichte der Troas’, in Schwertheim, E. (ed.), Die Troas. Neue Forschungen III (Asia Minor Studien 33; Bonn), 103–80.Google Scholar
Thys-Şenocak, L. and Aslan, C.C. 2008. ‘Narratives of destruction and construction: the complex cultural heritage of the Gallipoli peninsula’, in Rakoczy, L (ed.), Archaeology of Destruction (Cambridge), 29–47.Google Scholar
Tsetskhladze, G.R. 1998. ‘Greek colonisation of the Black Sea area: stages, models, and native population’, in Tsetskhladze, G.R. (ed.), The Greek Colonisation of the Black Sea Area (Stuttgart), 9–68.Google Scholar
Türker, A.Ç. 2009. ‘Christian and Byzantine archaeology on the valleys around Madytos’, Anadolu ve Çevresinde Ortaçağ 3, 51–74.Google Scholar
Utili, F. 1999. Die Archaische Nekropole von Assos (Bonn).Google Scholar
Waiblinger, A. 1999. ‘Céramiques de la nécropole d’Éléonte’, in Puig, M-C.V., Lissarrague, F., Rouillard, P. and Rouveret, A. (eds), Céramique et Peinture Grecques: Modes d'emploi. Actes du colloque international, École du Louvre, 26–27–28 April 1995 (Paris), 97–103.Google Scholar