Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T01:17:33.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk factors and milk yield losses associated with lameness in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

O. M. Onyiro ,
J. Offer  and
S. Brotherstone
O. M. Onyiro*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK
J. Offer
Affiliation:
Dairy Health Unit, Scottish Agricultural College Veterinary Science Division, Auchincruive, AYR KA6 5AE, UK
S. Brotherstone
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK Sustainable Livestock Systems Group, Scottish Agricultural College, Bush Estate, Penicuik, EH26 OQE, UK
*
E-mail: O.M.Onyiro@sms.ed.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Weekly locomotion scores on a scale of 1 to 5 were used to investigate the relationship between cattle lameness, management systems and the impact of lameness on milk production. The data were 14026 locomotion scores from 248 Holstein-Friesian cows. Cows were managed in two groups, XE (high-concentrate feed and housed indoors all year) and XM (low-concentrate feed and outdoors in summer). Analysis was performed using residual maximum likelihood. Results indicated that the most significant variables affecting locomotion were time of year when the animal was locomotion scored and management group. Cows scored during February and August had increased locomotion problems. Cows in the more intensively managed group had significantly poorer locomotion compared with those in the more extensive group. Older animals were more susceptible to lameness than heifers. Body weight, body condition score and days in milk (DIM) also accounted for significant variation in locomotion score. Poor locomotion was associated with a significant reduction in the milk yield of later lactation cows. There was a significant difference in the shape of the lactation curve depending on whether or not the cow was lame during lactation. Average persistency was greater for the group of cows never lame throughout lactation compared with those lame before 60 DIM.

Keywords

dairy cattleenvironmental effectlactation curvelocomotion scoremilk yield
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 8 , August 2008 , pp. 1230 - 1237
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkema, HW, Westrik, JD, van Keulen, KAS, Schukken, YH, Brand, A 1994. The effect of lameness on reproductive performance, milk production and culling in Dutch dairy farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 20, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsten, C, Frank, B 1996a. Sole hemorrhages in tied heifers in early gestation as an indicator of laminitis: effect of diet and flooring. Acta Veterinary Scandinavia 37, 375–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boettcher, PJ, Dekkers, JCM, Warnick, LD, Wells, SJ 1998. Genetic analysis of clinical lameness in Dutch dairy farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 20, 249–259.Google Scholar
Coffey, MP, Simm, G, Brotherstone, S 2002. Energy balance profiles for the first three lactations of dairy estimated using random regression. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2669–2678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collard, BL, Boettcher, JP, Dekkers, JCM, Petitclerc, D, Schaeffer, LR 2000. Relationships between energy balance and health traits of dairy cattle in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 2683–2690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deluyker, HA, Gay, JM, Weaver, LD, Azari, AS 1991. Change of milk yield with clinical diseases for a high producing dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 436–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enting, HA, Kooij, D, Dijkhuizen, AA, Huirne, RBM, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN 1997. Economic losses due to clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Production Science 49, 259–267.Google Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1997. Report on the Welfare of Dairy Cattle. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Surbiton, Surrey, UK.Google Scholar
Gitau, T, McDermott, JJ, Mbiuki, SM 1996. Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for lameness in small-scale farms in Kikuyu division, Kenya. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 28, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, LE, Hedges, VJ, Schukken, YH, Blowey, RW, Packington, AJ 2002. The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2250–2256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harder, B, Bennewitz, J, Hinrichs, D, Kalm, E 2006. Genetic parameters for health traits and their relationship to different persistency traits in German Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3202–3212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirst, WM, Murray, RD, Ward, WR, French, NP 2002. Generalized additive models and hierarchical logistic regression of lameness in dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 55, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, EF, Leaver, JD 1990. Lameness in dairy cattle and the type of concentrate given. Animal Production 51, 221–227.Google Scholar
Livesey, CT, Harrington, T, Johnstone, AM, May, SA, Metcalf, JA 1998. The effect of diet and housing on the development of sole haemorrhages, white line haemorrhages, and heel erosions in Holstein heifers. Animal Science 67, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobley M, Errington A and McGeorge A 2001. Implications of changes in the structure of agricultural business. University of Plymouth. A research report prepared for DEFRA.Google Scholar
Lowman BG, Scott N and Somerville S 1976. Condition Scoring of Cattle. Bulletin No. 6. East of Scotland, College of Agriculture, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
MacCallum, AJ, Knight, CH, Hendry, KAK, Wilde, CJ, Logue, DN, Offer, JE 2002. Effects of time of year and reproductive state on the proliferation and keratinisation of bovine hoof cells. Veterinary Record 151, 285–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manson, JF, Leaver, LD 1988. The influence of concentrate amount on locomotion and clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Animal Production 47, 185–190.Google Scholar
Martin, SW, Aziz, SA, Sandals, WCD, Curtis, RA 1982. The association between clinical disease, production and culling of Holstein-Friesian. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 62, 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsi, A 1992. Appraisal of interrelationships among measurement at different ages in meat-type chicken. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 19, 15–24.Google Scholar
Muir, BL, Fatehi, J, Schaeffer, LR 2004. Genetic relationships between persistency and reproductive performance in first-lactation Canadian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 3029–3037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Offer, JE, McNulty, D, Logue, DN 2000. Observations of lameness, hoof conformation and development of lesions in dairy cattle over four lactations. Veterinary Record 147, 105–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsson, G, Bergsten, C, Wiktorsson, H 1998. The influence of diet before and after calving on the feed intake, production and health of primiparious cows, with special reference to sole haemorrhages. Animal Science 66, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onyiro, OM, Brotherstone, S 2008. Genetic analysis of locomotion and associated conformation traits of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows managed in different housing systems. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 322–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pötzsch, CJ, Collis, VJ, Blowey, RW, Packington, AJ, Green, LE 2003. The impact on parity and duration of biotin supplementation on white line lameness in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2579–2582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pryce, JE, Esslemont, RJ, Thompson, R, Veerkamp, RF, Kossaibati, MA, Simm, G 1998. Estimation of genetic parameters using health, fertility and production data from a management recording system for dairy cattle. Animal Science 66, 577–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajala-Schultz, PJ, Grohn, YT, McCulloch, CE 1999. Effects of milk fever, ketosis, and lameness on milk yield in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 288–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, SS, Ward, WR, Lautenbach, K, Murry, RD 1993. Behaviour of lame and normal dairy cows in cubicles and in a straw yard. Veterinary Record 133, 204–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somers, JGCJ, Frankena, K, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN, Metz, JHM 2003. Prevalence of claw disorders in Dutch dairy cows exposed to several floor systems. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2082–2093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarlton, JF, Holah, DE, Evans, KM, Jones, S, Pearson, GR, Webster, AJF 2002. Biomechanical and histopathological changes in the support structures of bovine hooves around the time of first calving. Veterinary Journal 163, 196–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tranter, WP, Morris, RS 1991. A case study of lameness in three dairy herds. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 39, 88–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venables WN, Smith DM and the R Development Core Team 2005. An introduction to R. http://cran.r-project.orgGoogle Scholar
Waage, S, Sviland, S, Ødegard, SA 1998. Identification of risk factors for clinical mastitis in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1275–1284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warnick, LD, Pelzer, KD, Meadows, KA, diLorenzo, KW, Whittier, WD 1995. The relationship of clinical lameness with days in milk, lactation number and milk production in a sample of Virginia dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 78 (Suppl. 1), 169.Google Scholar
Wathes, C, Taylor, V 2002. Fertility in high yielding dairy cows. Holstein Journal 108–117.Google Scholar
Webster, AJF 2001. Effects of housing and two forage diets on the development of claw horn lesions in dairy cows at first calving and in first lactation. Veterinary Journal 162, 56–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed