Skip to main content Accessibility help

Review: Associations among goods, impacts and ecosystem services provided by livestock farming

  • B. Dumont (a1), J. Ryschawy (a2), M. Duru (a2), M. Benoit (a1), V. Chatellier (a3), L. Delaby (a4), C. Donnars (a5), P. Dupraz (a6), S. Lemauviel-Lavenant (a7), B. Méda (a8), D. Vollet (a9) and R. Sabatier (a10)...


Livestock is a major driver in most rural landscapes and economics, but it also polarises debate over its environmental impacts, animal welfare and human health. Conversely, the various services that livestock farming systems provide to society are often overlooked and have rarely been quantified. The aim of analysing bundles of services is to chart the coexistence and interactions between the various services and impacts provided by livestock farming, and to identify sets of ecosystem services (ES) that appear together repeatedly across sites and through time. We review three types of approaches that analyse associations among impacts and services from local to global scales: (i) detecting ES associations at system or landscape scale, (ii) identifying and mapping bundles of ES and impacts and (iii) exploring potential drivers using prospective scenarios. At a local scale, farming practices interact with landscape heterogeneity in a multi-scale process to shape grassland biodiversity and ES. Production and various ES provided by grasslands to farmers, such as soil fertility, biological regulations and erosion control, benefit to some extent from the functional diversity of grassland species, and length of pasture phase in the crop rotation. Mapping ES from the landscape up to the EU-wide scale reveals a frequent trade-off between livestock production on one side and regulating and cultural services on the other. Maps allow the identification of target areas with higher ecological value or greater sensitivity to risks. Using two key factors (livestock density and the proportion of permanent grassland within utilised agricultural area), we identified six types of European livestock production areas characterised by contrasted bundles of services and impacts. Livestock management also appeared to be a key driver of bundles of services in prospective scenarios. These scenarios simulate a breakaway from current production, legislation (e.g. the use of food waste to fatten pigs) and consumption trends (e.g. halving animal protein consumption across Europe). Overall, strategies that combine a reduction of inputs, of the use of crops from arable land to feed livestock, of food waste and of meat consumption deliver a more sustainable food future. Livestock as part of this sustainable future requires further enhancement, quantification and communication of the services provided by livestock farming to society, which calls for the following: (i) a better targeting of public support, (ii) more precise quantification of bundles of services and (iii) better information to consumers and assessment of their willingness to pay for these services.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Review: Associations among goods, impacts and ecosystem services provided by livestock farming
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Review: Associations among goods, impacts and ecosystem services provided by livestock farming
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Review: Associations among goods, impacts and ecosystem services provided by livestock farming
      Available formats


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (, which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author


Hide All
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail (Anses) 2016. Actualisation des repères du PNNS: révision des repères de consommations alimentaires. Avis de l’Anses, Saisine no. 2012-SA-0103, Décembre 2016, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Aleksandrowicz, L, Green, R, Joy, EJM, Smith, P and Haines, A 2016. The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: a systematic review. PLoS One 11, e0165797.
Bertoni, G, Trevisi, E, Houdijk, J, Calamari, L and Athanasiadou, S 2016. Welfare is accepted by nutrition through health, especially immune function and inflammation. In Nutrition and the welfare of farm animals (ed. CJC Phillips), pp. 85113. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzerland.
Beudou, J, Martin, G and Ryschawy, J 2017. Cultural and territorial vitality services play a key role in livestock agroecological transition in France. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37, 36.
Bourguet, D and Guillemaud, T 2016. The hidden and external costs of pesticide use. In Sustainable agriculture reviews (ed. E Lichtfouse), pp. 35120. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.
Chaudhary, A and Kastner, T 2016. Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade. Global Environmental Change 38, 195204.
Coignard, M, Guatteo, R, Veissier, I, de Boyer des Roches, A, Mounier, L, Lehébel, A and Bareille, N 2013. Description and factors of variation of the overall health score in French dairy cattle herds using the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 112, 296308.
Delaby, L, Chatellier, V, Dumont, B and Horan, B 2017. L’Irlande, un territoire porté par l’élevage laitier dans des conditions de milieu favorable et de marches incertains. INRA Productions Animales 30, 321–332.
Dourmad, JL, Delaby, L, Boixadera, JL, Ortis, C, Méda, B, Gaigné, C and Dumont, B 2017. Diversité des services rendus par les territoires à forte densité d’élevage, trois cas d’étude en Europe. INRA Productions Animales 30, 303-320.
Dumont, B, Andueza, D, Niderkorn, V, Lüscher, A, Porqueddu, C and Picon-Cochard, C 2015. A meta-analysis of climate change effects on forage quality in grasslands: specificities of mountain and Mediterranean areas. Grass and Forage Science 70, 239254.
Dumont, B, Hercule, J, Donnars, C and Dupraz, P 2018. Typology of European livestock production areas, Portail Data Inra, V2.
Duru, M, Donnars, C, Ryschawy, J, Therond, O and Dumont, B 2017. La « grange »: un cadre conceptuel pour appréhender les bouquets de services rendus par l’élevage dans les territoires. INRA Productions Animales 30, 273-284.
Duru, M, Pontes, L, da, S, Schellberg, J, Theau, JP and Therond, O 2018. Grassland functional diversity and management for enhancing ecosystem services and reducing environmental impacts: a cross-scale analysis. In Agroecosystem diversity. Reconciling contemporary agriculture and environment quality (ed. G Lemaire, P Carvalho, S Kronberg and S Recous), Academic Press, London, UK. (in press).
Fahrig, L, Baudry, J, Brotons, L, Burel, FG, Crist, TO, Fuller, RJ, Sirami, C, Siriwardena, GM and Martin, JL 2011. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecology Letters 14, 101112.
Finn, JA, Kirwan, L, Connolly, J, Sebastià, MT, Helgadottir, A, Baadshaug, OH, Bélanger, G, Black, A, Brophy, C, Collins, RP, Čop, J, Dalmannsdóttir, S, Delgado, I, Elgersma, A, Fothergill, M, Frankow-Lindberg, BE, Ghesquiere, A, Golinska, B, Golinski, P, Grieu, P, Gustavsson, AM, Höglind, M, Huguenin-Elie, O, Jørgensen, M, Kadziuliene, Z, Kurki, P, Llurba, R, Lunnan, T, Porqueddu, C, Suter, M, Thumm, U and Lüscher, A 2013. Ecosystem function enhanced by combining four functional types of plant species in intensively managed grassland mixtures: a 3-year continental-scale field experiment. Journal of Applied Ecology 50, 365375.
Fleurance, G, Farruggia, A, Lanore, L and Dumont, B 2016. How does stocking rate influence horse behaviour, performances and pasture biodiversity in mesophile grasslands? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 231, 255263.
Groot, JCJ, Jellema, A and Rossing, WAH 2010. Designing a hedgerow network in a multifunctional agricultural landscape: balancing trade-offs among ecological quality, landscape character and implementation costs. European Journal of Agronomy 32, 112119.
Hallmann, CA, Sorg, M, Jongejans, E, Siepel, H, Hofland, N, Schwan, H, Stenmans, W, Müller, A, Sumser, H, Hörren, T, Goulson, D and de Kroon, H 2017. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PloS One 12 (10), e0185809.
Havlik, PD, Leclère, D, Valin, H, Herrero, M, Schmid, E, Soussana, JF, Müller, C and Obersteiner, M 2015. Global climate change, food supply and livestock production systems: a bioeconomic analysis. In Climate change and food systems: global assessments and implications for food security and trade (ed. A Elbehri), pp. 176208. FAO Publishing, Rome, Italy.
Hedenus, F, Wirsenius, S and Johansson, D 2014. The importance of reduced meat and dairy consumption for meeting stringent climate change targets. Climatic Change 124, 7991.
Hercule, J, Chatellier, V, Piet, L, Dumont, B, Benoit, M, Delaby, L, Donnars, C, Savini, I and Dupraz, P 2017. Une typologie pour représenter la diversité des territoires d’élevage en Europe. INRA Productions Animales 30, 285–302.
Herrero-Jáuregui, C and Oesterheld, M 2018. Effects of grazing intensity on plant richness and diversity: a meta-analysis. Oikos 127, 757766.
Howe, C, Suich, H, Vira, B and Mace, GM 2014. Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: a meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Global Environmental Change 28, 263275.
Jopke, C, Kreyling, J, Maes, J and Koellner, T 2015. Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: Bagplots and cumulative correlations coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns. Ecological Indicators 49, 4652.
Kirchner, M, Schmidt, J, Kindermann, G, Kulmer, V, Mitter, H, Prettenthaler, F, Rüdisser, J, Schauppenlehner, T, Schönhart, M, Strauss, F, Tappeiner, U, Tasser, E and Schmid, E 2015. Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes - the impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies. Ecological Economics 109, 161174.
Kleijn, D, Baquero, RA, Clough, Y, Díaz, M, De Esteban, J, Fernández, F, Gabriel, D, Herzog, F, Holzschuh, A, Jöhl, R, Knop, E, Kruess, A, Marshall, EJP, Steffan-Dewenter, I, Tscharntke, T, Verhulst, J, West, TM and Yela, JL 2006. Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecology Letters 9, 243254.
Kragt, ME and Robertson, MJ 2014. Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices. Ecological Economics 102, 147157.
Lele, S, Springate-Baginski, O, Lakerveld, R, Deb, D and Dash, P 2013. Ecosystem services: origins, contributions, pitfalls, and alternatives. Conservation and Society 11, 343358.
Lemauviel-Lavenant, S and Sabatier, R 2017. Quand l’élevage est garant de la conservation des milieux patrimoniaux. INRA Productions Animales 30, 351–362.
Lescourret, F, Magda, D, Richard, G, Adam-Blondon, AF, Bardy, M, Baudry, J, Doussan, I, Dumont, B, Lefèvre, F, Litrico, I, Martin-Clouaire, R, Montuelle, B, Pellerin, S, Plantegenest, M, Tancoigne, E, Thomas, A, Guyomard, H and Soussana, JF 2015. A social-ecological approach to maintaining multiple agro-ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14, 6875.
Lüscher, G, Jeanneret, P, Schneider, MK, Hector, A, Arndorfer, M, Balazs, K, Baldi, A, Bailey, D, Choisis, JP, Dennis, P, Eiter, S, Elek, Z, Fjellstad, W, Gillingham, PK, Kainz, M, Kovacs-Hostyanszki, A, Hulsbergenk, KJ, Paoletti, MG, Papaja-Hulsbergenk, S, Sarthou, JP, Siebrecht, N, Wolfrum, S and Herzog, F 2015. Strikingly high effect of geographical location on fauna and flora of European agricultural grasslands. Basic and Applied Ecology 16, 281290.
Maes, J, Paracchini, ML, Zulian, G, Dunbar, MB and Alkemade, R 2012. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biological Conservation 155, 112.
Mahmoud, M, Liu, Y, Hartmann, H, Stewart, S, Wagener, T, Semmens, D, Stewart, R, Gupta, H, Dominguez, D, Dominguez, F, Hulse, D, Letcher, R, Rashleigh, B, Smith, C, Street, R, Ticehurst, J, Twery, M, van Delden, H, Waldick, R, White, D and Winter, L 2009. A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making. Environmental Modelling & Software 24, 798808.
Millenium Ecosystem Assessment 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Moraine, M, Grimaldi, J, Murgue, C, Duru, M and Therond, O 2016. Co-design and assessment of cropping systems for developing crop-livestock integration at the territory level. Agricultural Systems 147, 8797.
Mouchet, MA, Lamarque, P, Martín-López, B, Crouzat, E, Gos, P, Byczek, C and Lavorel, S 2014. An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 28, 298308.
Muller, A, Schader, C, El-Hage Scialabba, N, Brüggemann, J, Isensee, A, Erb, KH, Smith, P, Klocke, P, Leiber, F, Stolze, M and Niggli, U 2017. Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nature Communications 8, 1290.
Niderkorn, V, Martin, C, Rochette, Y, Julien, S and Baumont, R 2015. Associative effects between orchardgrass and red clover silages on voluntary intake and digestion in sheep: evidence of a synergy on digestible dry matter intake. Journal of Animal Science 93, 49674976.
Palomo, I, Martín-López, B, Alcorlo, P and Montes, C 2014. Limitations of protected areas zoning in Mediterranean cultural landscapes under the ecosystem services approach. Ecosystems 17, 12021215.
Pfimlin, A, Buczinski, B and Perrot, C 2005. Proposition de zonage pour préserver la diversité des systems d’élevage et des territoires européens. Fourrages 182, 311329.
Plieninger, T, Dijks, S, Oteros-Rozas, E and Bieling, C 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33, 118129.
Popp, A, Lotze-Campen, H and Bodirsky, B 2010. Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gases from agricultural production. Global Environmental Change 20, 451462.
Raudsepp-Hearne, C, Peterson, GD and Bennett, EM 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 52425247.
Ravetto Enri, S, Probo, M, Farruggia, A, Lanore, L, Blanchetête, A and Dumont, B 2017. A biodiversity-friendly rotational grazing system enhancing flower-visiting insect assemblages while maintaining animal and grassland productivity levels unvaried. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 241, 110.
Rockström, J, Steffen, W, Noone, K, Persson, Å, Stuart Chapin, F, Lambin, EF, Lenton, TM, Scheffer, M, Folke, C, Schellnhuber, HJ, Nykvist, B, de Wit, CA, Hughes, T, van der Leeuw, S, Rodhe, H, Sörlin, S, Snyder, PK, Costanza, R, Svedin, U, Falkenmark, M, Karlberg, L, Corell, RW, Fabry, VJ, Hansen, J, Walker, B, Liverman, D, Richardson, K, Crutzen, P and Foley, JA 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472475.
Rodríguez-Ortega, T, Oteros-Rozas, E, Ripoll-Bosch, R, Tichit, M, Martín-López, B and Bernués, A 2014. Applying the ecosystem services framework to pasture-based livestock farming systems in Europe. Animal 8, 13611372.
Röös, E, Patel, M, Spångberg, J, Carlsson, G and Rydhmer, L 2016. Limiting livestock production to pasture and by-products in a search for sustainable diets. Food Policy 58, 113.
Ryschawy, J, Disenhaus, C, Bertrand, S, Allaire, G, Aznar, O, Plantureux, S, Josien, E, Guinot, C, Lasseur, J, Perrot, C, Tchakerian, E, Aubert, C and Tichit, M 2017. Assessing multiple goods and services derived from livestock farming on a nation-wide gradient. Animal 11, 18611872.
Scohier, A and Dumont, B 2012. How do sheep affect plant communities and arthropod populations in temperate grasslands? Animal 6, 11291138.
Smith, J, Smith, P, Wattenbach, M, Zaehle, S, Hiederer, R, Jones, RJA, Montanarella, L, Rounsevell, MDA, Reginster, I. and Ewert, F. 2005. Projected changes in mineral soil carbon of European croplands and grasslands, 1990–2080. Global Change Biology 11, 21412152.
Solagro 2014. Afterres 2050. Un scénario soutenable pour l’agriculture et l’utilisation des terres en France à l’horizon 2050 (ed. Solagro), Toulouse, France.
Soussana, JF and Lemaire, G 2014. Coupling carbon and nitrogen cycles for environmentally sustainable intensification of grasslands and crop-livestock systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 190, 917.
Steinfeld, H, Gerber, P, Wassenaar, T, Castel, V, Rosales, M and de Haan, C 2006. Livestock’s long shadow. Environmental issues and options. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Swanepoel, F, Stroebel, A and Moyo, S 2010. The role of livestock in developing communities: Enhancing multifunctionality. University of the Free State and CTA, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tancoigne, E, Barbier, M, Cointet, JP and Richard, G 2014. The place of agricultural sciences in the literature on ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 10, 3548.
Treves, A and Jones, SM 2010. Strategic tradeoff for wildlife-friendly eco-labels. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8, 491498.
Turner, KG, Odgaard, MV, Bocher, PK, Dalgaard, T and Svenning, JC 2014. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 125, 89104.
Van der Biest, K, D’Hondt, R, Jacobs, S, Landuyt, D, Staes, J, Goethals, P and Meire, P 2014. EBI: an index for delivery of ecosystem service bundles. Ecological Indicators 37, 252265.
Van Kernebeek, HRJ, Oosting, SJ, Van Ittersum, MK, Bikker, P and de Boer, IJM 2016. Saving land to feed a growing population: consequences for consumption of crop and livestock products. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 21, 677687.
van Oudenhoven, A, Petz, K, Alkemade, R, Hein, L and de Groot, R 2012. Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 21, 110122.
van Zanten, HHE, Meerburg, BG, Bikker, P, Herrero, M. and de Boer, IJM 2016. Opinion paper: the role of livestock in a sustainable diet: a land-use perspective. Animal 10, 547549.
Vollet, D, Huguenin-Elie, O, Martin, B and Dumont, B 2017. La diversité des services rendus par les territoires d’élevage herbagers fournissant des produits de qualité dans des environnements préservés. INRA Productions Animales 30, 333–350.
WallisDeVries, MF, Parkinson, AE, Dulphy, JP, Sayer, M and Diana, E 2007. Effects of livestock breed and grazing intensity on biodiversity and production in grazing systems. 4. Effects on animal diversity. Grass and Forage Science 62, 185197.
Weindl, I, Lotze-Campen, H, Popp, A, Müller, C, Havlik, P, Herrero, M, Schmitz, C and Rolinski, S 2015. Livestock in a changing climate: production system transitions as an adaptation strategy for agriculture. Environmental Research Letters 10, 094021.
Westhoek, H, Lesschen, JP, Rood, T, Wagner, S, De Marco, A, Murphy-Bokern, D, Leip, A, van Grinsven, H, Sutton, MA and Oenema, O 2014. Food choices, health and environment: effects of cutting Europe’s meat and dairy intake. Global Environmental Change 26, 196205.
Zhang, W, Ricketts, TH, Kremen, C, Carney, K and Swinton, SM 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics 64, 253260.
zu Ermgassen, EKHJ, Phalan, B, Green, RE and Balmford, A 2016. Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way. Food Policy 58, 3548.


Review: Associations among goods, impacts and ecosystem services provided by livestock farming

  • B. Dumont (a1), J. Ryschawy (a2), M. Duru (a2), M. Benoit (a1), V. Chatellier (a3), L. Delaby (a4), C. Donnars (a5), P. Dupraz (a6), S. Lemauviel-Lavenant (a7), B. Méda (a8), D. Vollet (a9) and R. Sabatier (a10)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed