Ahnström, ML, Enfält, A-C, Hansson, I, Lundström, K
2006. Pelvic suspension improves quality characteristics in M. semimembranosus from Swedish dual purpose young bulls. Meat Science
Ahnström, ML, Hessle, A, Johansson, L, Hunt, MC, Lundstrom, K
2009. Influence of carcass suspension on meat quality of Charolais heifers from two sustainable feeding regimes. Animal
Ahnström, ML, Hunt, MC, Lundström, K
2011. Effects of pelvic suspension of beef carcasses on quality and physical traits of five muscles from four gender-age groups. Meat Science
Barnier, VMH, Smulders, FJM
1994. The effect of pelvic suspension on shear force values in various beef muscles. In 40th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, the Hague, the Netherlands, S-IVB,05.
Boakye, K, Mittal, GS
1993. Changes in pH and water holding properties of longissimus dorsi muscle during beef ageing. Meat Science
Bouton, PE, Harris, PV
1972. The effects of some post-slaughter treatments on the mechanical properties of bovine and ovine muscle. Journal of Food Science
Bouton, PE, Fisher, AL, Harris, PV, Baxter, RI
1973. A comparison of the effects of some post-slaughter treatments on the tenderness of beef. International Journal of Food Science and Technology
Bouton, PE, Ford, AL, Harris, PV, Ratcliff, D
1975. Objective-subjective assessment of meat tenderness. Journal of Texture Studies
Bowling, RA, Smith, GC, Carpenter, ZL, Dutson, TR, Oliver, WM
1977. Comparison of forage-finished and grain-finished beef carcasses. Journal of Animal Science
Brady, PL, Hunecke, ME
1985. Correlations of sensory and instrumental evaluations of roast beef texture. Journal of Food Science
Brewer, S, Novakofski, J
2008. Consumer sensory evaluations of aging effects on beef quality. Journal of Food Science
Claus, JR, Wang, H, Marriott, NG
1997. Prerigor carcass muscle stretching effects on tenderness of grain-fed beef under commercial conditions. Journal of Food Science
Commission of the European Communities
2005. Council regulation determining the Community scale for the classification of carcasses of adult bovine animals. In Council Regulation 2005/0171, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, p. 13.
Derbyshire, W, Lues, JFR, Joubert, G, Shale, K, Jacoby, A, Hugo, A
2007. Effect of electrical stimulation, suspension method and aging on beef tenderness of the Bonsmara breed. Journal of Muscle Foods
Gariepy, C, Jones, SDM, Robertson, WM
1990. Variation in meat quality at 3 sites along the length of the beef longissimus muscle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science
1997. What's in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perception of beef. Food Quality and Preference
Hessle, A, Nadeau, E, Johnsson, S
2007. Beef heifer production as affected by indoor feed intensity and slaughter age when grazing semi-natural grasslands in summer. Livestock Science
1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Science
Hostetler, RL, Landmann, WA, Link, BA, Fitzhugh, HA Jr
1970. Influence of carcass position during rigor mortis on tenderness of beef muscles: comparison of two treatments. Journal of Animal Science
Hostetler, RL, Carpenter, ZL, Smith, GC, Dutson, TR
1975. Comparison of post mortem treatments for improving tenderness of beef. Journal of Food Science
1985. Sensory analysis–methodology–flavour profile methods. Ref. no. ISO 6564:1985. ISO, Geneva.
1988. Sensory analysis – general guidance for the design of testrooms. Ref. no. ISO 8598:1988 (E). ISO, Geneva.
1993. Sensory analysis – general guidance for selection, training and monitoring of assessors. Ref. no. ISO 8586-1:1993 (E). ISO, Geneva.
Jeremiah, LE, Dugan, MER, Aalhus, JL, Gibson, LL
2003. Assessment of the chemical and cooking properties of the major beef muscles and muscle groups. Meat Science
Larmond, E, Petrasovits, A
1972. Relationship between Warner–Bratzler and sensory determinations of beef tenderness by the method of paired comparisons. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal
Mitchell, GE, Reed, AW, Rogers, SA
1991a. Influence of feeding regimen on the sensory qualities and fatty acid contents of beef steaks. Journal of Food Science
Mitchell, GE, Giles, JE, Rogers, SA, Tan, LT, Naidoo, RJ, Ferguson, DM
1991b. Tenderizing, ageing, and thawing effects on sensory, chemical, and physical properties of beef steaks. Journal of Food Science
Mooney, MT, Joo, ST, Kim, B, Troy, DJ
1999. Influence of post-mortem hanging methods on beef tenderness. Proceedings of the 45th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 466–467.
Ngapo, TM, Dransfield, E
2006. British consumers preferred fatness levels in beef: surveys from 1955, 1982 and 2002. Food Quality and Preference
NMKL (Nordic Committee on Food Analysis)
1989. NMKL no. 131-1989 fat. Determination according to SBR (Schmid-Bondsyndski-Ratslaff) in meat and meat products. NMKL, Oslo, Norway.
Peachey, BM, Purchas, RW, Duizer, LM
2002. Relationships between sensory and objective measures of meat tenderness of beef M. longissimus thoracis from bulls and steers. Meat Science
Schroeder, JW, Cramer, DA, Bowling, RA
Postmortem muscle alterations in beef carcass temperature, pH and palatability from electrical stimulation. Journal of Animal Science
Swedish Board of Agriculture
1998. Directions of classifications of carcasses from the Swedish Board of Agriculture. Proceedings of the SJVFS 127. Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping (in Swedish).
1968. Correlations between objective and sensory texture measurements. Food Technology
Toscas, PJ, Shaw, FD, Beilken, SL
1999. Partial least squares (PLS) regression for the analysis of instrument measurements and sensory meat quality data. Meat Science
Wahlgren, NM, Göransson, M, Linden, H, Willhammar, O
2002. Reducing the influence of animal variation and ageing on beef tenderness. Proceedings of the 48th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Rome, Italy, pp. 240–241.