Skip to main content Accessibility help

Expression of conditioned preference for low-quality food in sheep is modulated by foraging costs

  • F. Catanese (a1), R. A. Distel (a1) and J. J. Villalba (a2)


Past positive experiences can increase herbivores’ motivation to eat low-quality foods. However, this is not always translated into a higher preference for low-quality foods in choice tests among foods of higher nutritional quality. Foraging behavior is also affected by properties of the feeding context because the quality and abundance of foods in nature change in time and space. We hypothesized that in a choice situation, the expression of a past positive experience with a low-quality food is modulated by the costs associated with selecting a high-quality food option. A total of 24 sheep were randomly assigned into two groups (n=12). During conditioning phase, one group (CS+; i.e., conditioned group) was fed with oat hay (a low-quality food) for 20 min and immediately after a ration of soybean meal (a nutritious food), whereas the other group was also fed with oat hay but the offer of soybean meal was delayed 5 h (CS−; i.e., control group). After conditioning, we assessed sheep motivation to eat the oat hay in an experimental arena in which accessibility to alfalfa hay (a high-quality food) was increasingly restricted. When alfalfa hay was readily accessible, CS+ and CS− sheep almost exclusively selected this food, showing a small and similar preference for oat hay. However, when accessibility to alfalfa hay decreased, intake and selection of oat hay was greater in the CS+ sheep than in the CS− sheep. The latter was a consequence of differential changes in behavior between groups; for example, sheep in CS+ spent more time foraging oat hay and were more likely to switch to oat hay if they had previously been eating alfalfa hay than sheep in CS−. Our results show that behavioral expression of the conditioned preference for a low-quality food depends on parameters of the feeding context (e.g., availability). We suggest that this can be the link between learning models and optimal foraging models of diet selection.


Corresponding author



Hide All
ASAB/ABS 2006. Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Animal Behaviour 71, 245253.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2002. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Bailey, DW, Gross, JE, Laca, EA, Rittenhouse, LR, Coughenour, MB, Swift, DM and Sims, PL 1996. Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. Journal of Range Management 49, 386400.
Catanese, F, Distel, RA, Rodriguez Iglesias, RM and Villalba, JJ 2010. Role of early experience in the development of preference for low-quality food in sheep. Animal 4, 784791.
Dickinson, A 1980. Contemporary animal learning theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Distel, RA, Laca, EA, Griggs, TC and Demment, MW 1995. Patch selection by cattle: maximization of intake rate in horizontally heterogeneous pastures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 45, 1121.
Dumont, B and Boissy, A 2000. Grazing behaviour of sheep in a situation of conflict between feeding and social motivations. Behavioural Processes 49, 131138.
Dumont, B, Dutronc, A and Petit, M 1998. How readily will sheep walk for a preferred forage? Journal of Animal Science 76, 965971.
Eder, AB, Elliot, AJ and Harmon-Jones, E 2013. Approach and avoidance motivation: issues and advances. Emotion Review 5, 227229.
Farnsworth, KD and Illius, AW 1998. Optimal diet choice for large herbivores: an extended contingency model. Functional Ecology 12, 7481.
Favreau, A, Ginane, C and Baumont, A 2010. Feeding behaviour of sheep fed lucerne v. grass hays with controlled postingestive consequences. Animal 4, 13681377.
Focardi, S, Marcellini, P and Montanaro, P 1996. Do ungulates exhibit a food density threshold? A field study of optimal foraging and movement patterns. Journal of Animal Ecology 65, 606620.
Freidin, E, Catanese, F, Didoné, N and Distel, RA 2011. Mechanisms of intake induction of a low-nutritious food in sheep (Ovies aries). Behavioural Processes 87, 246252.
Freidin, E, Catanese, F, Cuello, MI and Distel, RA 2012. Induction of low-nutritious food intake by subsequent nutrient supplementation in sheep (Ovis aries). Animal 6, 13071315.
Illius, AW, Gordon, IJ, Elston, DA and Milne, JD 1999. Diet selection in goats: a test of intake-rate maximization. Ecology 80, 10081018.
Jackson, CH 2011. Multi-State Models for Panel Data: the msm package for R. Journal of Statistical Software 38, 129.
Lenth, RV 2012. Least-squares means. R package version 1.05-00. Retrieved April 5, 2013, from
Lynch, JJ, Hinch, GN and Adams, DB 1992. The behaviour of sheep: biological principles and implications for production. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1993. Measuring behaviour. An introductory guide, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Matthews, LR and Temple, W 1979. Concurrent schedule assessment of food preference in cows. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour 32, 245254.
Meier, JS, Kreuzer, M and Marquardt, S 2012. Design and methodology of choice feeding experiments with ruminant livestock. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 140, 105120.
National Research Council 1985. Nutrient requirements of sheep, 6th edition. The National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA.
O’Reagain, PJ and Grau, EA 1995. Sequence of species selection by cattle and sheep on South African sourveld. Journal of Range Management 48, 314321.
O’Reagain, PJ and Schwartz, J 1995. Dietary selection and foraging strategies of animals on rangelands. Coping with spatial and temporal variability. In Recent developments in the nutrition of hervivores (ed. M Journet, E Grenet, MH Farce, M Theriez and C Demarquilly), pp 407423. INRA Editions, Paris, France.
Parsons, AJ, Newman, JA, Penning, PD, Harvey, A and Orr, RJ 1994. Diet preference of sheep: effect of recent diet, physiological state and species abundance. Journal of Animal Ecology 63, 465478.
Pinheiro, J, Bates, D, DebRoy, S and Sarkar, D 2012. Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-105. Retrieved April 5, 2013, from
Prache, S, Gordon, IJ and Rook, AJ 1998. Foraging behaviour and diet selection in domestic herbivores. Annales De Zootechnie 47, 335345.
Provenza, FD, Villalba, JJ, Dziba, LE, Atwood, SB and Banner, RE 2003. Linking herbivore experience, varied diets, and plant biochemical diversity. Small Ruminant Research 49, 257274.
R Core Team 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Retrieved April 5, 2013 from,
Ralphs, MH 2005. Conditioning sheep to graze duncecap larkspur (Delphinium occidentale). Rangeland Ecology and Management 58, 628631.
Sclafani, A 1997. Learned controls of ingestive behaviour. Appetite 29, 153158.
Senft, RL, Coughenour, MB, Bailey, DW, Rittenhouse, LR, Sala, OE and Swift, DM 1987. Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience 37, 789799.
Shaw, RA, Villalba, JJ and Provenza, FD 2006. Influence of stock density and rate and temporal patterns of forage allocation on the diet mixing behavior of sheep grazing sagebrush steppe. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100, 207218.
Shettleworth, SJ 1998. Cognition, evolution and behavior. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA. pp. 127–128.
Sibbald, AM and Hooper, RJ 2004. Sociability and the willingness of sheep to move away from their companions in order to graze. Applied Animal Behavior Science 86, 5162.
Stephens, DW and Krebs, JR 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 35833597.
Villalba, JJ and Provenza, FD 1999. Nutrient-specific preferences by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch, casein, and water. Journal of Animal Science 77, 378387.
Whitney, TR and Olson, BE 2007. Will molasses or conditioning increase consumption of spotted knapweed by sheep? Rangeland Ecology and Management 60, 533537.
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Walker, N, Saveliev, AA and Smith, GM 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York, NY, USA, pp. 120–122.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Expression of conditioned preference for low-quality food in sheep is modulated by foraging costs

  • F. Catanese (a1), R. A. Distel (a1) and J. J. Villalba (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.